Smartphone accessibility: understanding the lived experience of users with cervical spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injury accessibility assistive technology mixed methods smartphone thematic analysis usability

Journal

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology
ISSN: 1748-3115
Titre abrégé: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101255937

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Apr 2023
Historique:
entrez: 3 4 2023
pubmed: 4 4 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To explore accessibility challenges encountered by smartphone users with cervical spinal cord injuries (C1-C8).To investigate the suitability of current technology and make recommendations to help future technology meet user needs. The study uses a mixed-method approach combining an inductive thematic analysis of nine semi-structured interviews with a quantitative analysis of thirty-nine questionnaires. The analysis generated four themes: The smartphone's potential to improve quality of life, participation, and well-being is limited by accessibility challenges hindering independent and private smartphone use. Future design work should focus on improving accessibility, investigating reasons for AT's poor quality and high cost, and removing barriers to end-user inclusion. To enhance user awareness of available technology, stakeholders should build and maintain an open platform to act as an information source for peer and professional support on assistive technology.Implications for RehabilitationA smartphone's potential to empower, connect, and improve the quality of life of people with a cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is limited by unresolved accessibility barriers, causing isolation.Standard interaction methods used by people with a cervical SCI to mitigate smartphone access barriers can require unwanted privacy compromises and limit independence.Participants struggled to find information and support on available accessibility solutions and assistive technologies that might enable easier smartphone use.Participants rarely used assistive technology (AT) to facilitate smartphone use, and available AT was regarded as expensive and poorly designed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37010939
doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2192246
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

Richard Armstrong-Wood (R)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Chrysovalanto Messiou (C)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Amber Kite (A)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Elisabeth Joyce (E)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Stephanie Panousis (S)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Hannah Campbell (H)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Arnaud Lauriau (A)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Julia Manning (J)

Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.

Tom Carlson (T)

Aspire Create, University College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH