Usability Testing of a Web-Based Empathy Training Portal: Mixed Methods Study.
empathy
internet
mixed design research
mobile devices
mobile phone
usability
web application
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Apr 2023
04 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
10
08
2022
accepted:
13
02
2023
revised:
26
01
2023
medline:
5
4
2023
entrez:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
5
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prepandemic period saw a rise in web-based teaching. However, web-based tools for teaching the essential clinical skill of cognitive empathy (also known as perspective taking) remain limited. More of these tools are needed and require testing for ease of use and understanding by students. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the In Your Shoes web-based empathy training portal application for students using quantitative and qualitative methods. This 3-phase formative usability study used a mixed methods design. In mid-2021, we conducted a remote observation of student participants interacting with our portal application. Their qualitative reflections were captured, followed by data analysis and iterative design refinements of the application. Overall, 8 third- and fourth-year nursing students from an undergraduate baccalaureate program at a Canadian university, in the western province of Manitoba, were included in this study. Participants in phases 1 and 2 were remotely observed by 3 research personnel while engaged in predefined tasks. In phase 3, two student participants were asked to use the application as they liked in their own environments, after which a video-recorded exit interview with a think-aloud process was conducted as participants responded to the System Usability Scale. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed content analysis to analyze the results. This small study included 8 students with a range of technology skills. Usability themes were based on participants' comments on the application's appearance, content, navigation, and functionality. The biggest issues that participants experienced were with navigating the application's "tagging" features during video analysis and the length of educational material. We also observed variations in 2 participants' system usability scores in phase 3. This may be because of their different comfort levels with technology; however, additional research is required. We made iterative refinements to our prototype application (eg, added pop-up messages and provided a narrated video on the application's "tagging" function) based on participant feedback. With increasing engagement in web-based teaching, technology has become an essential medium for receiving health care education. We developed a novel prototype application as a supplemental classroom tool to foster students' self-directed learning of empathy. This study provided direction for refinements to optimize the usability of and satisfaction with this innovative application. Qualitative feedback revealed favorable input toward learning perspective taking place on the web and helpful recommendations for improving user experiences with the application. We could not fully assess the application's key functions owing to the COVID-19 protocols. Thus, our next step is to obtain feedback from a larger sample of student users, whose experiences performing "live" video capture, annotation, and analysis will be more authentic and wholesome with the refined application. We discuss our findings in relation to research on nursing education, perspective taking, and adaptive e-learning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The prepandemic period saw a rise in web-based teaching. However, web-based tools for teaching the essential clinical skill of cognitive empathy (also known as perspective taking) remain limited. More of these tools are needed and require testing for ease of use and understanding by students.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the In Your Shoes web-based empathy training portal application for students using quantitative and qualitative methods.
METHODS
METHODS
This 3-phase formative usability study used a mixed methods design. In mid-2021, we conducted a remote observation of student participants interacting with our portal application. Their qualitative reflections were captured, followed by data analysis and iterative design refinements of the application. Overall, 8 third- and fourth-year nursing students from an undergraduate baccalaureate program at a Canadian university, in the western province of Manitoba, were included in this study. Participants in phases 1 and 2 were remotely observed by 3 research personnel while engaged in predefined tasks. In phase 3, two student participants were asked to use the application as they liked in their own environments, after which a video-recorded exit interview with a think-aloud process was conducted as participants responded to the System Usability Scale. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed content analysis to analyze the results.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This small study included 8 students with a range of technology skills. Usability themes were based on participants' comments on the application's appearance, content, navigation, and functionality. The biggest issues that participants experienced were with navigating the application's "tagging" features during video analysis and the length of educational material. We also observed variations in 2 participants' system usability scores in phase 3. This may be because of their different comfort levels with technology; however, additional research is required. We made iterative refinements to our prototype application (eg, added pop-up messages and provided a narrated video on the application's "tagging" function) based on participant feedback.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
With increasing engagement in web-based teaching, technology has become an essential medium for receiving health care education. We developed a novel prototype application as a supplemental classroom tool to foster students' self-directed learning of empathy. This study provided direction for refinements to optimize the usability of and satisfaction with this innovative application. Qualitative feedback revealed favorable input toward learning perspective taking place on the web and helpful recommendations for improving user experiences with the application. We could not fully assess the application's key functions owing to the COVID-19 protocols. Thus, our next step is to obtain feedback from a larger sample of student users, whose experiences performing "live" video capture, annotation, and analysis will be more authentic and wholesome with the refined application. We discuss our findings in relation to research on nursing education, perspective taking, and adaptive e-learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37014693
pii: v7i1e41222
doi: 10.2196/41222
pmc: PMC10131903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e41222Informations de copyright
©Michelle Lobchuk, Lisa Hoplock, Nicole Harder, Marcia Friesen, Julie Rempel, Prachotan Reddy Bathi. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 04.04.2023.
Références
Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1255-64
pubmed: 22238060
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0173403
pubmed: 28362821
J Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;17(2):141-4
pubmed: 24359216
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):524-30
pubmed: 16704404
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:86-93
pubmed: 27614549
Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1182-91
pubmed: 19707055
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Jan;63(1):32-41
pubmed: 26191979
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1951-1954
pubmed: 28526190
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 10;10:894
pubmed: 31920748
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2124
pubmed: 30483174
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):227-44
pubmed: 22878028
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98
pubmed: 30045735
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1171-7
pubmed: 23807099
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 3;6(8):e35319
pubmed: 35921138
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3474-8
pubmed: 25267758
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):138-143
pubmed: 30467775
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):148-52
pubmed: 18358667
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 05;7(9):15386
pubmed: 31489839
J Allied Health. 2018 Fall;47(3):196-203
pubmed: 30194826
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Feb;105(2):146-165
pubmed: 31219259
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105154
pubmed: 34583238
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Mar;44:102739
pubmed: 32220796
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 May;35(5):663-72
pubmed: 25665926
BMC Nurs. 2018 May 24;17:21
pubmed: 29849504
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 30;8(1):
pubmed: 32019104
Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1062-1072
pubmed: 31120296
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3541-3551
pubmed: 35020074
Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):947-957
pubmed: 31688037
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Nov;94:104524
pubmed: 32771262
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Apr;75:80-94
pubmed: 30739841
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:172-178
pubmed: 30096510
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e036471
pubmed: 32978187