Validation of direct CT measurement of malrotation in femoral neck fractures: A bone model study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
06
2022
accepted:
27
11
2022
medline:
6
4
2023
entrez:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
5
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While postoperative malrotation in the subtrochanteric region is a well-known problem, malrotation after osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures has not been extensively studied. In this context, many methods for perioperatively assessment of femoral torsion have been described, but none of them is applicable in the basicervical region of the proximal femur. As an important difference in femoral neck fractures, the discontinuous neck fails to serve as a significant "pointer" for measurements and malfunctions to be placed in relation to the condylar plane. Considering postoperative maltorsion at any location as a substantial negative effect on patients' outcome and functional expectations, precise and patient-friendly rotation measurement standards in femoral neck fractures are desired in clinical practice. Recently, a novel computed tomography (CT) based geometric technique was described named "direct measurement" with promising results covering this diagnostic disparity, but still requires validation. Thus, we aimed to validate the previously described technique using a controlled range of displacement in a femoral neck fracture Sawbone® model. A goniometer was designed to set retro- and anteversion of the proximal femur in a reproducible manner. Prospectively, all femurs underwent a CT scan and were measured 3D for displacement. The interclass correlation between the CT measurements and the goniometer measurements was calculated and was found to be very high (1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00; p < 0.001). For the mean of all measurements, the Pearson's correlation was 1.00 (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the measurements of both investigators were observed, with 20° of retroversion not significant (-1.20 ± 1.71; 95% confidence interval: -2.43-0.03; p = 0.054). This CT-based 3D measurement technique may allow for perioperative malrotation assessment in basicervical femoral neck fractures and appears to be feasible in femoral neck fractures when it comes to rare cases of osteosynthesis. Further investigations are still needed to define the thresholds of malrotation provoking functional impairment after osteosynthesis in basicervical femoral neck fractures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While postoperative malrotation in the subtrochanteric region is a well-known problem, malrotation after osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures has not been extensively studied. In this context, many methods for perioperatively assessment of femoral torsion have been described, but none of them is applicable in the basicervical region of the proximal femur. As an important difference in femoral neck fractures, the discontinuous neck fails to serve as a significant "pointer" for measurements and malfunctions to be placed in relation to the condylar plane. Considering postoperative maltorsion at any location as a substantial negative effect on patients' outcome and functional expectations, precise and patient-friendly rotation measurement standards in femoral neck fractures are desired in clinical practice. Recently, a novel computed tomography (CT) based geometric technique was described named "direct measurement" with promising results covering this diagnostic disparity, but still requires validation. Thus, we aimed to validate the previously described technique using a controlled range of displacement in a femoral neck fracture Sawbone® model.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
A goniometer was designed to set retro- and anteversion of the proximal femur in a reproducible manner. Prospectively, all femurs underwent a CT scan and were measured 3D for displacement. The interclass correlation between the CT measurements and the goniometer measurements was calculated and was found to be very high (1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00; p < 0.001). For the mean of all measurements, the Pearson's correlation was 1.00 (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the measurements of both investigators were observed, with 20° of retroversion not significant (-1.20 ± 1.71; 95% confidence interval: -2.43-0.03; p = 0.054).
CONCLUSION
This CT-based 3D measurement technique may allow for perioperative malrotation assessment in basicervical femoral neck fractures and appears to be feasible in femoral neck fractures when it comes to rare cases of osteosynthesis. Further investigations are still needed to define the thresholds of malrotation provoking functional impairment after osteosynthesis in basicervical femoral neck fractures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37014837
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278850
pii: PONE-D-22-18506
pmc: PMC10072492
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0278850Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Liodakis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Aug 4;26(1):86
pubmed: 34348796
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Aug;14(4):272-281
pubmed: 34216364
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1173-1179
pubmed: 31823497
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7
pubmed: 16814787
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250409
pubmed: 33901221
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 May;132(5):613-6
pubmed: 22200903
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1S):S79-S87
pubmed: 31680016
Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):691-696
pubmed: 29433801
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1865-1871
pubmed: 33881592
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 16;2022:1286419
pubmed: 35222875
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1343-1350
pubmed: 33903934
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Mar 11;55(3):621-628
pubmed: 33995865
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;34(3):e96-e101
pubmed: 31567544
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 May;194(5):1230-3
pubmed: 20410408
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jan;19(1):17-26
pubmed: 21205764
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 6;98(13):1097-102
pubmed: 27385683
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Dec;96(8):844-8
pubmed: 20822963
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Mar;121(3):191-198
pubmed: 29330745
J Orthop Sci. 2022 Jan;27(1):146-152
pubmed: 33309404
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Mar;121(3):206-215
pubmed: 29392339
Hip Pelvis. 2020 Dec;32(4):170-181
pubmed: 33335865
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1243-7
pubmed: 23934503
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Oct 16;101(20):1852-1859
pubmed: 31626010
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Oct 28;6(4):
pubmed: 34746632
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):29-45
pubmed: 29959502
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1259-1264
pubmed: 27501703