Gluconic acid improves performance of newly weaned piglets associated with alterations in gut microbiome and fermentation.

Butyrate Gluconic acid Lactobacillus amylovorus Megasphaera elsdenii Piglet Weaning

Journal

Porcine health management
ISSN: 2055-5660
Titre abrégé: Porcine Health Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684126

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 14 06 2022
accepted: 23 01 2023
medline: 5 4 2023
entrez: 4 4 2023
pubmed: 5 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Weaning is a critical phase in the pigs' life and gut health might be compromised. Gluconic acid was shown to be poorly absorbed but readily fermented to butyrate in the gut which in turn can improve gut function. Hence, a total of 144 weaning pigs were fed the experimental diets for 42 days. Three treatments were replicated in 8 pens with 6 piglets each: control; low dietary dose of gluconic acid, 9 g/kg; and high dietary dose of gluconic acid, 18 g/kg. After 21 days, one piglet from each pen was sampled for blood haematology and biochemistry, fore- and hindgut digesta characteristics and microbiota, and distal small intestinal histo-morphological indices and gene expression. Feeding gluconic acid enhanced performance in period d 0-14 post-weaning, in particular feed intake was increased (P = 0.028), though the high dose did not show benefits over the low dose. Regarding d 0-42, feed intake was elevated (P = 0.026). At d 21, piglets fed 18 g/kg gluconic acid showed a trend for lower number of total white blood cells (P = 0.060), caused by particularly lower numbers of lymphocytes as compared to control (P = 0.028). Highly reduced plasma urea was found for groups fed gluconic acid, it amounted to 2.6 and 2.6 mmol/L for the 9 and 18 g/kg level, respectively, as compared to 3.8 mmol/L in control (P = 0.003). Feeding gluconic acid promoted the relative abundance of lactic-acid-producing and acid-utilizing bacteria. In distal small intestine, Lactobacillus amylovorus increased substantially from 11.3 to 82.6% for control and gluconic acid 18 g/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). In mid-colon, the butyrate producers Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (P > 0.05) and Megasphaera elsdenii (P < 0.05) showed highest abundance in gluconic acid 18 g/kg. Consequently, in caecum and mid-colon, increased relative molar percentage of butyrate were found, e.g., 10.0, 12.9 et 14.7% in caecum for gluconic acid at 0, 9, and 18 g/kg, respectively (P = 0.046). Elevated mRNA anti-inflammatory cytokine and survival signalling levels in distal small intestinal mucosa were found by feeding gluconic acid which might be mediated by butyrate. Gluconic acid may have potential to alleviate the postweaning growth-check in pigs by altering microbiota composition and fermentation in the gut.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Weaning is a critical phase in the pigs' life and gut health might be compromised. Gluconic acid was shown to be poorly absorbed but readily fermented to butyrate in the gut which in turn can improve gut function. Hence, a total of 144 weaning pigs were fed the experimental diets for 42 days. Three treatments were replicated in 8 pens with 6 piglets each: control; low dietary dose of gluconic acid, 9 g/kg; and high dietary dose of gluconic acid, 18 g/kg. After 21 days, one piglet from each pen was sampled for blood haematology and biochemistry, fore- and hindgut digesta characteristics and microbiota, and distal small intestinal histo-morphological indices and gene expression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Feeding gluconic acid enhanced performance in period d 0-14 post-weaning, in particular feed intake was increased (P = 0.028), though the high dose did not show benefits over the low dose. Regarding d 0-42, feed intake was elevated (P = 0.026). At d 21, piglets fed 18 g/kg gluconic acid showed a trend for lower number of total white blood cells (P = 0.060), caused by particularly lower numbers of lymphocytes as compared to control (P = 0.028). Highly reduced plasma urea was found for groups fed gluconic acid, it amounted to 2.6 and 2.6 mmol/L for the 9 and 18 g/kg level, respectively, as compared to 3.8 mmol/L in control (P = 0.003). Feeding gluconic acid promoted the relative abundance of lactic-acid-producing and acid-utilizing bacteria. In distal small intestine, Lactobacillus amylovorus increased substantially from 11.3 to 82.6% for control and gluconic acid 18 g/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). In mid-colon, the butyrate producers Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (P > 0.05) and Megasphaera elsdenii (P < 0.05) showed highest abundance in gluconic acid 18 g/kg. Consequently, in caecum and mid-colon, increased relative molar percentage of butyrate were found, e.g., 10.0, 12.9 et 14.7% in caecum for gluconic acid at 0, 9, and 18 g/kg, respectively (P = 0.046). Elevated mRNA anti-inflammatory cytokine and survival signalling levels in distal small intestinal mucosa were found by feeding gluconic acid which might be mediated by butyrate.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Gluconic acid may have potential to alleviate the postweaning growth-check in pigs by altering microbiota composition and fermentation in the gut.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37016456
doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00305-1
pii: 10.1186/s40813-023-00305-1
pmc: PMC10074721
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

10

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Nat Metab. 2020 Sep;2(9):840-848
pubmed: 32694821
Gut. 1997 Mar;40(3):400-5
pubmed: 9135532
Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22
pubmed: 19246619
J Nutr. 2002 Aug;132(8):2229-34
pubmed: 12163667
FASEB J. 2000 Dec;14(15):2380-2
pubmed: 11024006
Nutr Res Rev. 1999 Jun;12(1):117-45
pubmed: 19087448
J Anim Sci. 2006 Feb;84(2):370-8
pubmed: 16424265
Anim Sci J. 2019 Aug;90(8):948-960
pubmed: 31148361
ISME J. 2017 Dec;11(12):2639-2643
pubmed: 28731476
Gut. 2000 Sep;47(3):397-403
pubmed: 10940278
Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R19
pubmed: 17291332
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Aug;40(15):e115
pubmed: 22730293
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3406-15
pubmed: 12824337
Poult Sci. 2018 Jul 1;97(7):2303-2311
pubmed: 29562369
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 3;13(11):e1005752
pubmed: 29099853
Arch Anim Nutr. 2010 Apr;64(2):136-54
pubmed: 20481352
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 19;10(2):
pubmed: 32092931
J Lipid Res. 2013 Sep;54(9):2325-40
pubmed: 23821742
J Mol Biol. 1981 May 15;148(2):107-27
pubmed: 7028991
Anim Nutr. 2018 Jun;4(2):151-159
pubmed: 30140754
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 1;29(1):308-11
pubmed: 11125122
J Biosci Bioeng. 2018 May;125(5):519-524
pubmed: 29331526
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004 Dec;287(6):G1168-74
pubmed: 15308471
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jan;53(1):28-52
pubmed: 14657094
J Exp Med. 1976 Dec 1;144(6):1674-8
pubmed: 1003108
Curr Microbiol. 2020 Dec;77(12):3831-3841
pubmed: 33079206
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 Jul-Aug;28(4):210-22; discussion 222-3
pubmed: 15291402
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 1996 Aug;42(4):313-23
pubmed: 8906632
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010 Oct;94(5):670-6
pubmed: 20050950
FASEB J. 2016 Feb;30(2):863-73
pubmed: 26514167
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Oct;71(5):353-360
pubmed: 30157585
Poult Sci. 2005 Sep;84(9):1356-62
pubmed: 16206555
Arch Anim Nutr. 2009;63(4):267-80
pubmed: 26967697
Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Dec;23(2):366-84
pubmed: 20937167

Auteurs

Joris Michiels (J)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. joris.michiels@ugent.be.

Damien Truffin (D)

Roquette Frères, 1 rue de La Haute Loge, 62136, Lestrem, France.

Maryam Majdeddin (M)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Mario Van Poucke (M)

Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Elout Van Liefferinge (E)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Noémie Van Noten (N)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Mario Vandaele (M)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Céline Van Kerschaver (C)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Jeroen Degroote (J)

Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Luc Peelman (L)

Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Pierre Linder (P)

Roquette Frères, 1 rue de La Haute Loge, 62136, Lestrem, France.

Classifications MeSH