Mitigating the economic burden of GnRH agonist therapy for progestogen-resistant endometriosis: why not?
GnRH agonists
endometriosis
leuprorelin
pelvic pain
systematic review
triptorelin
Journal
Human reproduction open
ISSN: 2399-3529
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101722764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
12
11
2022
revised:
24
02
2023
medline:
6
4
2023
entrez:
5
4
2023
pubmed:
6
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Is it possible to reduce the cost of GnRH agonist treatment for endometriosis by using non-standard dosing regimens? An extended-interval dosing regimen of a 3.75 mg depot formulation of triptorelin injected every 6 weeks instead of every 4 weeks reduces the cost by one-third without compromising the effect on pain relief. Cost constitutes a limit to prolonged GnRH agonists use. Alternative modalities to reduce the economic burden of GnRH agonist treatment have been anecdotally attempted. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of three alternative modalities for GnRH use in women with endometriosis, i.e. intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, reduced drug dosage, and extended-interval dosing regimens of depot formulations. A PubMed and Embase search was initially conducted in October 2022 and updated in January 2023 using the following search strings: (endometriosis OR adenomyosis) AND (GnRH-agonists OR gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists OR triptorelin OR leuprorelin OR goserelin OR buserelin OR nafarelin). Full-length articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals since 1 January 1980, and reporting original data on GnRH agonist treatment of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis were selected. Information was extracted on study design, GnRH-agonist used, dosage, total duration of therapy, side effects, treatment adherence, and pelvic pain relief. Reviews, commentaries, conference proceedings, case reports, and letters to the editor were excluded. Of the 1664 records screened, 14 studies regarding clinical outcomes associated with the 3 considered alternative modalities for GnRH agonist use were eventually included (intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, n = 2; low-dose or 'draw-back' therapy, n = 8; extended-interval dosing regimen, n = 4). Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (double blind, n = 2) and eight adopted a prospective cohort design (non-comparative, n = 6; comparative, n = 2). A total of 776 women with endometriosis were recruited in the above studies (intermittent oestrogen deprivation therapy, n = 77; low-dose or 'draw-back' therapy, n = 528; extended-interval dosing regimen, n = 171). Robust data demonstrating cost saving without detrimental clinical consequences were available for the extended-interval dosing regimen only. In particular, the 3.75 mg triptorelin depot preparation inhibits ovarian function for a longer period compared with the 3.75 mg leuprorelin depot preparation, allowing injections every 6 instead of 4 weeks. Based on the cost indicated by the Italian Medicine Agency for the 3.75 mg triptorelin depot preparation, this would translate in a yearly saving of €744.60 (€2230.15-€1485.55; -33.4%). The quality of the evidence reported in the selected articles was not formally evaluated and a quantitative synthesis could not be performed. Some studies were old and the tested therapeutic approaches were apparently obsolete. Only cost containment associated with GnRH analogue use, and not cost-effectiveness, has been addressed. Consuming less resources without negatively impacting on health outcomes carries ethical and practical implications for individuals and the community, as this approach may result in overall increased healthcare access. This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2023, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano). E.S. discloses payments from Ferring for research grants and honoraria from Merck-Serono for lectures. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest. N/A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37016694
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad008
pii: hoad008
pmc: PMC10067151
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
hoad008Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
E.S. discloses payments from Ferring for research grants and honoraria from Merck-Serono for lectures. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2022 Jun 22;377:e069573
pubmed: 35732297
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Feb;73(2):144-50
pubmed: 8116353
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 15;93(3):208-11
pubmed: 23570596
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Oct;43(10):1550-1554
pubmed: 28707810
Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):177-88
pubmed: 19136455
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;166(2):740-5
pubmed: 1536260
Gynecol Endocrinol. 1992 Sep;6(3):153-61
pubmed: 1442160
Fertil Steril. 1995 May;63(5):955-62
pubmed: 7720940
Bone. 1995 Feb;16(2):261-7
pubmed: 7756056
BJOG. 2009 Feb;116(3):366-71
pubmed: 19187368
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1086-1096
pubmed: 29871796
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Feb;18(1):1-4
pubmed: 29186995
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):193-199
pubmed: 30551159
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1522-7
pubmed: 15193471
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):504.e1-5
pubmed: 18241819
Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):583-592
pubmed: 34895700
Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):441-61
pubmed: 19279046
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1999 Oct;25(5):295-301
pubmed: 10533322
Fertil Steril. 1998 Mar;69(3):443-9
pubmed: 9531874
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Jan;15(1):CR1-4
pubmed: 19114964
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;166(2):757-61
pubmed: 1531579
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69(2):73-7
pubmed: 19923847
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Fertil Steril. 1996 Feb;65(2):342-8
pubmed: 8566259
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Aug;17(8):469-481
pubmed: 32606361
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):726-749.e10
pubmed: 28988744
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:164-8
pubmed: 25461372
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Jun;15(8):1153-79
pubmed: 24832495
Gynecol Endocrinol. 1997 Jun;11(3):187-94
pubmed: 9209899
BMC Urol. 2014 Jan 25;14:9
pubmed: 24460605
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):720-727
pubmed: 26520703
Nihon Rinsho. 2001 Jan;59 Suppl 1:124-8
pubmed: 11235149
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 26;2022(2):hoac009
pubmed: 35350465
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;10(3):
pubmed: 33802101
Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):297-304
pubmed: 14967363
Climacteric. 2001 Jun;4(2):120-36
pubmed: 11428176
Fertil Steril. 1997 Jun;67(6):1013-8
pubmed: 9176437
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Oct;41(10):656-9
pubmed: 17199917
Fertil Steril. 2000 Apr;73(4):799-804
pubmed: 10731543
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):28-40
pubmed: 28525302
Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2144-2152
pubmed: 31687764
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2359-2371
pubmed: 34904270
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37(4):263-4
pubmed: 8050732
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Mar;71:78-99
pubmed: 32680785
Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2267-2279
pubmed: 35717987
Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):839-852
pubmed: 33640070
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):623.e1-623.e11
pubmed: 31226295
Hong Kong Med J. 2000 Sep;6(3):260-4
pubmed: 11025843
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):77-80
pubmed: 16359772
Fertil Steril. 2000 Aug;74(2):299-305
pubmed: 10927048
Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45
pubmed: 1644507
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;177(6):1413-8
pubmed: 9423744