Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Future Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 04 2023
03 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
4
2023
entrez:
5
4
2023
pubmed:
6
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of progressive diabetic kidney disease, but reliable prediction tools that can be used in clinical practice and aid in patients' understanding of disease progression are currently lacking. To develop and externally validate a model to predict future trajectories in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease using data from 3 European multinational cohorts. This prognostic study used baseline and follow-up information collected between February 2010 and December 2019 from 3 prospective multinational cohort studies: PROVALID (Prospective Cohort Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for Validation of Biomarkers), GCKD (German Chronic Kidney Disease), and DIACORE (Diabetes Cohorte). A total of 4637 adult participants (aged 18-75 years) with type 2 diabetes and mildly to moderately impaired kidney function (baseline eGFR of ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2) were included. Data were analyzed between June 30, 2021, and January 31, 2023. Thirteen variables readily available from routine clinical care visits (age, sex, body mass index; smoking status; hemoglobin A1c [mmol/mol and percentage]; hemoglobin, and serum cholesterol levels; mean arterial pressure, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, and intake of glucose-lowering, blood-pressure lowering, or lipid-lowering medication) were selected as predictors. Repeated eGFR measurements at baseline and follow-up visits were used as the outcome. A linear mixed-effects model for repeated eGFR measurements at study entry up to the last recorded follow-up visit (up to 5 years after baseline) was fit and externally validated. Among 4637 adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (mean [SD] age at baseline, 63.5 [9.1] years; 2680 men [57.8%]; all of White race), 3323 participants from the PROVALID and GCKD studies (mean [SD] age at baseline, 63.2 [9.3] years; 1864 men [56.1%]) were included in the model development cohort, and 1314 participants from the DIACORE study (mean [SD] age at baseline, 64.5 [8.3] years; 816 men [62.1%]) were included in the external validation cohort, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 5.0 (0.6) years. Updating the random coefficient estimates with baseline eGFR values yielded improved predictive performance, which was particularly evident in the visual inspection of the calibration curve (calibration slope at 5 years: 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15). The prediction model had good discrimination in the validation cohort, with the lowest C statistic at 5 years after baseline (0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80). The model also had predictive accuracy, with an R2 ranging from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76) at year 1 to 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.63) at year 5. In this prognostic study, a reliable prediction model was developed and externally validated; the robust model was well calibrated and capable of predicting kidney function decline up to 5 years after baseline. The results and prediction model are publicly available in an accompanying web-based application, which may open the way for improved prediction of individual eGFR trajectories and disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37017968
pii: 2803123
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1870
pmc: PMC10077108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e231870Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
BMC Med Genet. 2013 Feb 14;14:25
pubmed: 23409726
Kidney Int. 2022 Mar;101(3):459-462
pubmed: 35190033
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Oct;52(4):653-60
pubmed: 18585833
Diabetologia. 2020 Apr;63(4):788-798
pubmed: 31915892
JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1553-9
pubmed: 21482743
Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1947-1954
pubmed: 29980527
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58
pubmed: 33564405
Kidney Int. 2019 Dec;96(6):1381-1388
pubmed: 31679767
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
J Nephropharmacol. 2015 Oct 09;5(1):49-56
pubmed: 28197499
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Jun 12;2:11
pubmed: 31093561
Transpl Int. 2017 Jan;30(1):6-10
pubmed: 27896874
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13654
pubmed: 34211028
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1737-1749
pubmed: 34554658
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Feb;79(2):217-230.e1
pubmed: 34298143
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Jul;1(4):761-7
pubmed: 17699284
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7
pubmed: 25981519
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Jul;46(5):464-472
pubmed: 35739044
Diabetes Care. 2017 Mar;40(3):391-397
pubmed: 28077457
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):1527-1538
pubmed: 30830157
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119(3):c195-9; discussion c199
pubmed: 21832844
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Apr;27(4):1454-60
pubmed: 21862458
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Nov 18;5(1):19
pubmed: 34789343
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jan;7(1):78-84
pubmed: 22076874
Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):211-9
pubmed: 25561516
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Nov;119:125-133
pubmed: 30342680
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 29;8(1):15940
pubmed: 30374033
BMC Med. 2021 Apr 28;19(1):99
pubmed: 33906644
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0120995
pubmed: 25973922
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 01;12:672350
pubmed: 34276558
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0213157
pubmed: 30897159
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(1):181-190
pubmed: 29466797
Kidney Int. 2019 Jan;95(1):178-187
pubmed: 30415941