Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 04 2023
05 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
4
2023
entrez:
5
4
2023
pubmed:
6
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature. To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies. In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration.
SEARCH METHODS
Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies.
MAIN RESULTS
In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37018131
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015016.pub3
pmc: PMC10075508
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Morphine
76I7G6D29C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD015016Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Références
J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;28(1):55-60
pubmed: 18165830
Childs Nerv Syst. 2000 Feb;16(2):93-9; discussion 100
pubmed: 10663814
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986 Feb;33(1):179-201
pubmed: 3081865
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018 Mar;14(3):287-301
pubmed: 29363349
Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1673-82
pubmed: 15158628
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:142-150
pubmed: 32798713
Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jun;49(6):488-90
pubmed: 4604887
Pain Med. 2012 Dec;13(12):1658-9
pubmed: 23013512
Pain. 2002 Aug;98(3):305-313
pubmed: 12127032
Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):607-16
pubmed: 19692803
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 17;3:CD013732
pubmed: 33729556
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Sep;87(3):390-9
pubmed: 11517122
J Med Assoc Thai. 1986 Apr;69(4):210-5
pubmed: 3723050
Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Jul 30;:
pubmed: 32734593
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD003311
pubmed: 23440789
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Dec;49(12):1291-7
pubmed: 26369570
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Aug;17(8):756-74
pubmed: 17596221
Behav Brain Res. 1992 Jul 31;49(1):1-6
pubmed: 1388792
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Dec;9(4):602-614
pubmed: 29314757
Pain. 2021 Feb 1;162(2):353-360
pubmed: 32826760
J Pediatr. 1978 Apr;92(4):529-34
pubmed: 305471
J Pediatr. 2016 May;172:81-87.e2
pubmed: 26763312
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:130-139
pubmed: 33476769
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Aug;24(4):101003
pubmed: 30987943
Neonatal Netw. 2018 Jul;37(4):238-247
pubmed: 30567922
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Mar;57(3):393-417
pubmed: 29178007
JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2419-27
pubmed: 14612478
Cir Pediatr. 2003 Jan;16(1):30-3
pubmed: 12793291
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F433-F439
pubmed: 30322973
Pain. 1989 Oct;39(1):31-36
pubmed: 2812853
Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Feb;21(1):72-80
pubmed: 31494028
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1723-9
pubmed: 11401896
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1305-11
pubmed: 15520112
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;123(7):991-9
pubmed: 16009843
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:140-151
pubmed: 33171275
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):2009-15
pubmed: 12897995
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 3;3:CD014876
pubmed: 36870076
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Dec 1;173(12):1186-1197
pubmed: 31609437
J Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;45(2):100-1
pubmed: 9267361
Ther Drug Monit. 2020 Oct;42(5):778-786
pubmed: 32427759
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):192
pubmed: 34271853
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 31;20(11):
pubmed: 31159216
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010 May 1;52(1):37-42
pubmed: 20053516
Pediatr Med Chir. 1997 Nov-Dec;19(6):419-24
pubmed: 9595578
Pain. 2000 Oct;88(1):89-95
pubmed: 11098103
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 2;326(1):1-9
pubmed: 1530752
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1351-9
pubmed: 15867047
Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(2):189-93
pubmed: 10736083
Neonatal Netw. 1993 Sep;12(6):59-66
pubmed: 8413140
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20154271
pubmed: 26810788
Anesthesiol Clin. 2020 Mar;38(1):1-18
pubmed: 32008645
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110 Suppl 1:i53-72
pubmed: 23542078
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S133-53
pubmed: 18443637
Acta Paediatr. 2013 Jun;102(6):579-83
pubmed: 23414120
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):642-52
pubmed: 12697593
Clin J Pain. 1996 Mar;12(1):13-22
pubmed: 8722730
Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):882-90
pubmed: 11273919
Klin Padiatr. 1995 Nov-Dec;207(6):341-6
pubmed: 8569137
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Oct;44(5):591-609
pubmed: 31006834
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Jul;22(1):600-9
pubmed: 11516602
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;17(3):281-99
pubmed: 12803568
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Dec;31(12):1616-23
pubmed: 8986972
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 18;(3):CD009574
pubmed: 25785365