New bone formation at the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis: characterization of backfill in MRI and CT.
CT
MRI
axial spondyloarthritis
new bone formation
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2023
01 12 2023
Historique:
accepted:
20
03
2023
received:
31
12
2022
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
6
4
2023
entrez:
5
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
MRI findings of the SI joint space in axial SpA (axSpA) include inflammation and fat metaplasia inside an erosion; the latter is also termed 'backfill'. We compared such lesions with CT to better characterize whether they represent new bone formation. We identified patients with axSpA who underwent both CT and MRI of the SI joints in two prospective studies. MRI datasets were jointly screened by three readers for joint space-related findings and grouped into three categories: type A-high short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and low T1 signal; type B-high signal in both sequences; type C-low STIR and high T1 signal. Image fusion was used to identify MRI lesions in CT before we measured Hounsfield units (HU) in each lesion and surrounding cartilage and bone. Ninety-seven patients with axSpA were identified and we included 48 type A, 88 type B, and 84 type C lesions (maximum 1 lesion per type and joint). The HU values were 73.6 (s.d. 15.0) for cartilage, 188.0 (s.d. 69.9) for spongious bone, 1086.0 (s.d. 100.3) for cortical bone, 341.2 (s.d. 96.7) for type A, 359.3 (s.d. 153.5) for type B and 446.8 (s.d. 123.0) for type C lesions. Lesion HU values were significantly higher than those for cartilage and spongious bone, but lower than those for cortical bone (P < 0.001). Type A and B lesions showed similar HU values (P = 0.93), whereas type C lesions were denser (P < 0.001). All joint space lesions show increased density and might contain calcified matrix, suggesting new bone formation, with a gradual increase in the proportion of calcified matrix towards type C lesions (backfill).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37018132
pii: 7108763
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead142
pmc: PMC10691921
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3893-3898Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;78(11):1550-1558
pubmed: 31422357
RMD Open. 2021 May;7(2):
pubmed: 34049998
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):43
pubmed: 33514428
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2000 Oct;75(5):457-65
pubmed: 11155693
Endocr Dev. 2015;28:33-55
pubmed: 26138834
Joint Bone Spine. 2021 Mar;88(2):105106
pubmed: 33186734
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Feb;81(2):237-242
pubmed: 34049855
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):2958-67
pubmed: 25047851
Insights Imaging. 2019 Jul 24;10(1):67
pubmed: 31338670
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):55
pubmed: 28752489
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1502-1508
pubmed: 28283515
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Nov;75(11):1958-1963
pubmed: 26768408
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):73-84
pubmed: 28110981
J Rheumatol. 2018 Jul;45(7):915-921
pubmed: 29657142