A combination of the frequent fungicides boscalid and dimoxystrobin with the neonicotinoid acetamiprid in field-realistic concentrations does not affect sucrose responsiveness and learning behavior of honeybees.

Apis mellifera Insecticide Non-SBI fungicide Pesticide mixture Sublethal effect Synergistic effect

Journal

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
ISSN: 1090-2414
Titre abrégé: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7805381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2023
Historique:
received: 14 12 2022
revised: 06 03 2023
accepted: 29 03 2023
medline: 26 4 2023
pubmed: 6 4 2023
entrez: 5 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The increasing loss of pollinators over the last decades has become more and more evident. Intensive use of plant protection products is one key factor contributing to this decline. Especially the mixture of different plant protection products can pose an increased risk for pollinators as synergistic effects may occur. In this study we investigated the effect of the fungicide Cantus® Gold (boscalid/dimoxystrobin), the neonicotinoid insecticide Mospilan® (acetamiprid) and their mixture on honeybees. Since both plant protection products are frequently applied sequentially to the same plants (e.g. oilseed rape), their combination is a realistic scenario for honeybees. We investigated the mortality, the sucrose responsiveness and the differential olfactory learning performance of honeybees under controlled conditions in the laboratory to reduce environmental noise. Intact sucrose responsiveness and learning performance are of pivotal importance for the survival of individual honeybees as well as for the functioning of the entire colony. Treatment with two sublethal and field relevant concentrations of each plant protection product did not lead to any significant effects on these behaviors but affected the mortality rate. However, our study cannot exclude possible negative sublethal effects of these substances in higher concentrations. In addition, the honeybee seems to be quite robust when it comes to effects of plant protection products, while wild bees might be more sensitive.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37018858
pii: S0147-6513(23)00354-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114850
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

acetamiprid 5HL5N372P0
Fungicides, Industrial 0
2-chloro-N-(4-chlorobiphenyl-2-yl)nicotinamide 32MS8ZRD1V
Sucrose 57-50-1
Neonicotinoids 0
Insecticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114850

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Antonia Schuhmann (A)

University of Würzburg, Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. Electronic address: antonia.schuhmann@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Ricarda Scheiner (R)

University of Würzburg, Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. Electronic address: ricarda.scheiner@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH