The effect of initiation prediction and non-prediction on muscle relaxation control.
Motor-evoked potential
Muscle relaxation
Journal
Journal of physical therapy science
ISSN: 0915-5287
Titre abrégé: J Phys Ther Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9105359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
accepted:
30
12
2022
medline:
7
4
2023
entrez:
6
4
2023
pubmed:
7
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the difference in the excitability of the primary motor cortex between initiation-predictive and non-predictive tasks, where the onset of muscle relaxation is predicted and not predicted, respectively. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen participants were asked to perform rapid muscle relaxation either through an initiation-predictive or non-predictive task. The baseline was set at 20 percent of the maximum voluntary contraction. Motor-evoked potentials and H-reflexes elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and median nerve electrical stimulation, respectively, were measured. The mean stimulation time from the onset of relaxation was calculated, and the motor-evoked potentials and Hoffmann's reflexes elicited during the first (immediately before relaxation) and second half (long before relaxation) were compared. [Results] The amplitude of the motor-evoked potential significantly increased in both initiation-predictive and non-predictive tasks when compared to the baseline, indicating increased excitability of the primary motor cortex. The motor-evoked potential from the initiation-non-predictive task, but not the initiation-predictive task, was associated with increased excitability of the primary motor cortex immediately before relaxation. [Conclusion] Variations in the predictability of motor movements are associated with changes in muscle relaxation control in the central nervous system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37020829
doi: 10.1589/jpts.35.293
pii: 2022-155
pmc: PMC10067346
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
293-299Informations de copyright
2023©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Références
Phys Ther Res. 2020 Dec 4;23(2):106-112
pubmed: 33489647
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
pubmed: 7519144
Neurosci Res. 2005 Dec;53(4):428-35
pubmed: 16213048
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Feb;136(4):431-8
pubmed: 11291723
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975 Dec;38(12):1154-62
pubmed: 1219079
J Physiol. 1993 May;464:361-78
pubmed: 8229807
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan 1;113(1):110-5
pubmed: 25298384
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Apr;93(2):138-46
pubmed: 7512920
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 1;296:78-84
pubmed: 26341320
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Sep;221(3):299-308
pubmed: 22791231
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Dec;183(4):531-9
pubmed: 17665175
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):985-95
pubmed: 26686531
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;172(2):230-45
pubmed: 16424977
J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3527-34
pubmed: 10212312
Exp Brain Res. 1989;77(1):12-22
pubmed: 2792255
Muscle Nerve. 1999 Oct;22(10):1419-25
pubmed: 10487909
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Dec;111(12):2196-9
pubmed: 11090772
Front Physiol. 2019 Dec 03;10:1457
pubmed: 31849707
J Neurophysiol. 1970 May;33(3):365-81
pubmed: 5439343
Neurosci Res. 2015 Mar;92:39-45
pubmed: 25448688
Hum Neurobiol. 1986;5(1):59-66
pubmed: 3700149
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;110(3):397-403
pubmed: 10363761
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 May;3(5):348-59
pubmed: 11988774
Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(3):448-57
pubmed: 6499972
Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(2):249-56
pubmed: 4029300
J Physiol. 1979 Sep;294:33-50
pubmed: 512949
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113563
pubmed: 25406079
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;31(6):781-790
pubmed: 30883285