Combined Oral Contraceptive Adherence and Pregnancy Rates.
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2023
01 05 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
09
02
2023
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
7
4
2023
entrez:
6
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the relationship of adherence and pregnancy in participants using an estetrol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive. We performed a secondary analysis for which we pooled data from two parallel, multicenter, phase 3 trials (United States and Canada, Europe and Russia) that enrolled participants 16-50 years of age to receive estetrol 15 mg and drospirenone 3 mg in a 24 hormone and four placebo pills regimen for up to 13 cycles. Participants reported pill intake, sexual intercourse, and other contraceptive use on paper diaries. We limited this efficacy analysis to at-risk cycles (one or more reported acts of intercourse and no other contraceptive use) in participants 16-35 years of age at screening. We excluded cycles with other contraceptive use unless pregnancy occurred in that cycle. We assessed primarily the relationship between number of pills not taken per cycle and pregnancies and, secondarily, when pregnancies occurred during product use with a test for trend and χ 2 analyses as appropriate. Among 2,837 participants in this analysis, 31 on-treatment pregnancies occurred during 26,455 at-risk cycles. Pregnancies occurred in 0.09%, 0.25%, 0.83%, and 1.6% of cycles in which participants reported they took all hormone pills (n=25,613 cycles) or did not take one (n=405 cycles), two (n=121 cycles), and more than two (n=314 cycles) hormone-containing pills, respectively ( P <.001). No pregnancies occurred in 2,216 cycles when one or more pills were missed and missed-pill instructions were followed. All pregnancies related to not taking pills occurred in the first three cycles. Pregnancy rates ranged from 0% to 0.21% per cycle with no significant trend by cycle ( P =.45). Pregnancy occurs more frequently when combined oral contraceptive users report not taking all hormone-containing pills per 28-day cycle and exceeds 1% only when more than two pills are not taken. Pregnancies in participants who reported missed pills occurred only when missed-pill instructions were not followed. A 0.09% pregnancy risk per cycle among users of a 24 hormone and four placebo pills formulation who report taking all pills likely approximates a true method-failure rate. Estetra SRL, an affiliate company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02817828 and NCT02817841.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37023457
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005155
pii: 00006250-990000000-00733
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
0
Estetrol
ENB39R14VF
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02817841', 'NCT02817828']
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
989-994Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial Disclosure Mitchell D. Creinin has received speaking honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Mayne and Organon. He has served on the Advisory Boards for Evofem, Fuji Pharma, Gedeon Richter, GlaxoSmithKline, Mayne, Merck & Co., OLIC, Organon, and Searchlight. He has been a Consultant for Estetra SRL (an affiliate company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals [includes support for medical and safety oversight of these studies]), Libbs, Mayne, and Medicines360, and his university department receives contraceptive research funding for Dr. Creinin from Chemo Research SL, Evofem, HRA Pharma, Medicines360, Merck & Co., and Sebela. Jeffrey T. Jensen has received payments for consulting from Bayer Healthcare, Evofem, Hope Medicine, Foundation Consumer Healthcare, Mayne Pharma, ViiV Healthcare, and TherapeuticsMD. OHSU has received research support from AbbVie, Bayer Healthcare, Daré, Estetra SPRL, Hope Medicine, Medicines360, Merck, Myovant, and Sebela. These companies and organizations may have a commercial or financial interest in the results of this research and technology. These potential conflicts of interest have been reviewed and managed by OHSU. Melissa J. Chen serves as an ad hoc speaker for Mayne Pharma and her university department received contraceptive research funding for Dr. Chen from Estetra SRL (an affiliate company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals). Amanda Black has received honoraria from Bayer, Organon, Pfizer, Searchlight and Mithra. She has received research funding from Linepharma and Bayer for the conduct of clinical trials. Dustin Costescu has received honoraria from Bayer, Organon, Merck, Duchesnay, and Searchlight Pharma. They serve on advisory boards for Bayer and Organon, and has previously served on an advisory board for Merck. Their department has received research funding from Bayer, Linepharma, and Mithra for the conduct of contraception and family planning studies. Jean-Michel Foidart is a member of the board at Mithra Pharmaceuticals, received honoraria from Gedeon Richter, and received financial support for the supervision of these studies.
Références
Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2017–2019. NCHS Data Brief, no. 388. National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Contraceptive use by method 2019: data booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/435). Accessed February 10, 2023. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf
Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Berry-Bibee E, Horton LG, Zapata LB, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1–103. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1
World Health Organization Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs, Knowledge SUCCESS. Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2022 update). Accessed February 10, 2023. https://fphandbook.org/sites/default/files/WHO-JHU-FPHandbook-2022Ed-v221114b.pdf
Jensen JT, Creinin MD. Contraception, population and the environment. In: Jensen J, Creinin MD, editors. Speroff and Darney's clinical guide to contraception. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
Trussell J, Portman D. The creeping Pearl: why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills? Contraception 2013;88:604–10. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.001
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.001
Creinin MD, Westhoff CL, Bouchard C, Chen MJ, Jensen JT, Kaunitz AM, et al. Estetrol-drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: North American phase 3 efficacy and safety results. Contraception 2021;104:222–8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.002
Gemzell-Danielsson K, Apter D, Zatik J, Weyers S, Piltonen T, Suturina L, et al. Estetrol-drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: a clinical study of contraceptive efficacy, bleeding pattern and safety in Europe and Russia. BJOG 2022;129:63–71. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16840
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16840
Jensen JT, Kaunitz AM, Achilles SL, Zatik J, Weyers S, Piltonen T, et al. Pooled efficacy results of estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraception phase 3 trials. Contraception 2022:116:215–43. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.009
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.009
Trussell J. Understanding contraceptive failure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.11.008
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.11.008
Caetano C, Peers T, Papadopoulos L, Wiggers K, Engler Y, Grant H. Millennials and contraception: why do they forget? An international survey exploring the impact of lifestyles and stress levels on adherence to a daily contraceptive regimen. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care 2019;24:30–8. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1563065
doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1563065
Chabbert-Buffet N, Jamin C, Lete I, Lobo P, Nappi RE, Pintiaux A, et al. Missed pills: frequency, reasons, consequences and solutions. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care 2017;22:165–9. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1295437
doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1295437
Visser M, Holinka CF, Coelingh Bennink HJT. First human exposure to exogenous single-dose oral estetrol in early postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2008;11:31–40. doi: 10.1080/13697130802056511
doi: 10.1080/13697130802056511
Gérard C, Arnal JF, Jost M, Douxfils J, Lenfant F, Fontaine C, et al. Profile of estetrol, a promising native estrogen for oral contraception and the relief of climacteric symptoms of menopause. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022;15:121–37. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2054413
doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2054413
Willis SA, Kuehl TJ, Spiekerman AM, Sulak PJ. Greater inhibition of the pituitary–ovarian axis in oral contraceptive regimens with a shortened hormone-free interval. Contraception 2006;74:100–3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.006
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.006
Dinger J, Do Minh T, Buttmann N, Bardenheuer K. Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large U.S. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:33–40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820095a2
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820095a2
Zapata LB, Steenland MW, Brahmi D, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review. Contraception 2013;87:685–700. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.035
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.035
Huber LRB, Broel EC, Mitchelides AN, Dmochowski J, Dulin M, Scholes D. Comparison of prospective daily diaries and retrospective recall to measure oral contraceptive adherence. Contraception 2013;88:492–7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.007
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.007