External Validation of the KOOS-ACL in the MOON Group Cohort of Young Athletes Followed for 10 Postoperative Years.
ACL
KOOS
knee ligaments
patient reported outcome
validation
young athletes
Journal
The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
medline:
2
5
2023
pubmed:
8
4
2023
entrez:
7
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Anterior Cruciate Ligament (KOOS-ACL) is a short form version of the KOOS, developed to target populations of young active patients with ACL tears. The KOOS-ACL consists of 2 subscales: Function (8 items) and Sport (4 items). The KOOS-ACL was developed and validated using data from the Stability 1 study from baseline to postoperative 2 years. To validate the KOOS-ACL in an external sample of patients matching the outcome's target population. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network group cohort of 839 patients aged 14 to 22 years who tore their ACLs while playing sports was used to assess internal consistency reliability, structural validity, convergent validity, responsiveness to change, and floor/ceiling effects of the KOOS-ACL at 4 time points: baseline and postoperative 2, 6, and 10 years. Detection of treatment effects between graft type (hamstring tendon vs bone-patellar tendon-bone) were also compared between the full-length KOOS and KOOS-ACL. The KOOS-ACL demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability (α = .82-.89), structural validity (Tucker-Lewis index and comparative fit index = 0.98-0.99; standardized root mean square residual and root mean square error of approximation = 0.04-0.07), convergent validity (Spearman correlation with International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form = 0.66-0.85; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function = 0.84-0.95), and responsiveness to change across time (large effect sizes from baseline to postoperative 2 years; The KOOS-ACL shows improved structural validity when compared with the full-length KOOS and adequate psychometric properties in a large external sample of high school and college athletes. This strengthens the argument to use the KOOS-ACL to assess young active patients with ACL tears in clinical research and practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Anterior Cruciate Ligament (KOOS-ACL) is a short form version of the KOOS, developed to target populations of young active patients with ACL tears. The KOOS-ACL consists of 2 subscales: Function (8 items) and Sport (4 items). The KOOS-ACL was developed and validated using data from the Stability 1 study from baseline to postoperative 2 years.
PURPOSE
To validate the KOOS-ACL in an external sample of patients matching the outcome's target population.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS
The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network group cohort of 839 patients aged 14 to 22 years who tore their ACLs while playing sports was used to assess internal consistency reliability, structural validity, convergent validity, responsiveness to change, and floor/ceiling effects of the KOOS-ACL at 4 time points: baseline and postoperative 2, 6, and 10 years. Detection of treatment effects between graft type (hamstring tendon vs bone-patellar tendon-bone) were also compared between the full-length KOOS and KOOS-ACL.
RESULTS
The KOOS-ACL demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability (α = .82-.89), structural validity (Tucker-Lewis index and comparative fit index = 0.98-0.99; standardized root mean square residual and root mean square error of approximation = 0.04-0.07), convergent validity (Spearman correlation with International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form = 0.66-0.85; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function = 0.84-0.95), and responsiveness to change across time (large effect sizes from baseline to postoperative 2 years;
CONCLUSION
The KOOS-ACL shows improved structural validity when compared with the full-length KOOS and adequate psychometric properties in a large external sample of high school and college athletes. This strengthens the argument to use the KOOS-ACL to assess young active patients with ACL tears in clinical research and practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37026768
doi: 10.1177/03635465231160726
pmc: PMC10155281
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1457-1465Références
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71
pubmed: 23638278
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2915-2921
pubmed: 30074823
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13
pubmed: 26786084
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 23;8(7):2325967120934751
pubmed: 32754624
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2481-2487
pubmed: 26724828
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Oct;45(5):453-61
pubmed: 11642645
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29
pubmed: 27012756
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3173-3180
pubmed: 31589465
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):298-309
pubmed: 31917613
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1342-1350
pubmed: 35238805
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96
pubmed: 9699158
Am J Sports Med. 2023 May;51(6):1447-1456
pubmed: 37026778
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):285-297
pubmed: 31940222
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):152
pubmed: 11799013