Mental Health Practitioners' and Young People's Experiences of Talking About Social Media During Mental Health Consultations: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study.

clinician and young people’s experiences digital technology and social media mental health consultations young people

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 06 10 2022
accepted: 08 03 2023
revised: 06 03 2023
medline: 8 4 2023
entrez: 7 4 2023
pubmed: 8 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Increasing concerns among mental health care professionals have focused on the impact of young people's use of digital technology and social media on their mental well-being. It has been recommended that the use of digital technology and social media be routinely explored during mental health clinical consultations with young people. Whether these conversations occur and how they are experienced by both clinicians and young people are currently unknown. This study aimed to explore mental health practitioners' and young people's experiences of talking about young people's web-based activities related to their mental health during clinical consultations. Web-based activities include use of social media, websites, and messaging. Our aim was to identify barriers to effective communication and examples of good practice. In particular, we wanted to obtain the views of young people, who are underrepresented in studies, on their social media and digital technology use related to mental health. A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups (11 participants across 3 groups) with young people aged 16 to 24 years and interviews (n=8) and focus groups (7 participants across 2 groups) with mental health practitioners in the United Kingdom. Young people had experience of mental health problems and support provided by statutory mental health services or third-sector organizations. Practitioners worked in children and young people's mental health services, statutory services, or third-sector organizations such as a university counseling service. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Practitioners and young people agreed that talking about young people's web-based activities and their impact on mental health is important. Mental health practitioners varied in their confidence in doing this and were keen to have more guidance. Young people said that practitioners seldom asked about their web-based activities, but when asked, they often felt judged or misunderstood. This stopped them from disclosing difficult web-based experiences and precluded useful conversations about web-based safety and how to access appropriate web-based support. Young people supported the idea of guidance or training for practitioners and were enthusiastic about sharing their experiences and being involved in the training or guidance provided to practitioners. Practitioners would benefit from structured guidance and professional development to enable them to support young people in feeling more willing to disclose and talk about their web-based experiences and their impact on their mental health. This is reflected in practitioners' desire for guidance to improve their confidence and skills to safely support young people in navigating the challenges of the web-based world. Young people want to feel comfortable discussing their web-based activities during their consultations with mental health practitioners, both in tackling the challenges and using the opportunity to discuss their experiences, gain support, and develop coping strategies related to web-based safety.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Increasing concerns among mental health care professionals have focused on the impact of young people's use of digital technology and social media on their mental well-being. It has been recommended that the use of digital technology and social media be routinely explored during mental health clinical consultations with young people. Whether these conversations occur and how they are experienced by both clinicians and young people are currently unknown.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explore mental health practitioners' and young people's experiences of talking about young people's web-based activities related to their mental health during clinical consultations. Web-based activities include use of social media, websites, and messaging. Our aim was to identify barriers to effective communication and examples of good practice. In particular, we wanted to obtain the views of young people, who are underrepresented in studies, on their social media and digital technology use related to mental health.
METHODS METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups (11 participants across 3 groups) with young people aged 16 to 24 years and interviews (n=8) and focus groups (7 participants across 2 groups) with mental health practitioners in the United Kingdom. Young people had experience of mental health problems and support provided by statutory mental health services or third-sector organizations. Practitioners worked in children and young people's mental health services, statutory services, or third-sector organizations such as a university counseling service. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS RESULTS
Practitioners and young people agreed that talking about young people's web-based activities and their impact on mental health is important. Mental health practitioners varied in their confidence in doing this and were keen to have more guidance. Young people said that practitioners seldom asked about their web-based activities, but when asked, they often felt judged or misunderstood. This stopped them from disclosing difficult web-based experiences and precluded useful conversations about web-based safety and how to access appropriate web-based support. Young people supported the idea of guidance or training for practitioners and were enthusiastic about sharing their experiences and being involved in the training or guidance provided to practitioners.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Practitioners would benefit from structured guidance and professional development to enable them to support young people in feeling more willing to disclose and talk about their web-based experiences and their impact on their mental health. This is reflected in practitioners' desire for guidance to improve their confidence and skills to safely support young people in navigating the challenges of the web-based world. Young people want to feel comfortable discussing their web-based activities during their consultations with mental health practitioners, both in tackling the challenges and using the opportunity to discuss their experiences, gain support, and develop coping strategies related to web-based safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37027182
pii: v7i1e43115
doi: 10.2196/43115
pmc: PMC10131638
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e43115

Subventions

Organisme : EPA
ID : EP-D-17-018
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Jane Derges, Helen Bould, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Paul Moran, Myles-Jay Linton, Raphael Rifkin-Zybutz, Lucy Biddle. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.04.2023.

Références

JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jan 31;10:e43840
pubmed: 36719729
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 14;9(4):e33450
pubmed: 35436240
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):485
pubmed: 35854237
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m870
pubmed: 32188595
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197712
pubmed: 29795637
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77555
pubmed: 24204868
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Apr 17;10:e44064
pubmed: 37067869
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18286
pubmed: 33427684
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):842-854
pubmed: 32459004
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181722
pubmed: 28813437
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 4;5(1):e32758
pubmed: 35254285
School Ment Health. 2018;10(4):450-461
pubmed: 30464778
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 18;12:271-283
pubmed: 30406005
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):837-841
pubmed: 32706126
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e143
pubmed: 33640074

Auteurs

Jane Derges (J)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Helen Bould (H)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Rachael Gooberman-Hill (R)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Paul Moran (P)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Myles-Jay Linton (MJ)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Raphael Rifkin-Zybutz (R)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, United Kingdom.

Lucy Biddle (L)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH