Validation of [Formula: see text]Tc and [Formula: see text]Lu quantification parameters for a Monte Carlo modelled gamma camera.

Molecular radiotherapy Quantitative activity estimation Quantitative imaging SIMIND Monte Carlo code

Journal

EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 19 06 2022
accepted: 29 03 2023
medline: 9 4 2023
entrez: 8 4 2023
pubmed: 9 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation in Nuclear Medicine is a powerful tool for modeling many physical phenomena which are difficult to track or measure directly. MC simulation in SPECT/CT imaging is particularly suitable for optimizing the quantification of activity in a patient, and, consequently, the absorbed dose to each organ. To do so, validating MC results with real data acquired with gamma camera is mandatory. The aim of this study was the validation of the calibration factor (CF) and the recovery coefficient (RC) obtained with SIMIND Monte Carlo code for modeling a Siemens Symbia Intevo Excel SPECT-CT gamma camera to ensure optimal [Formula: see text]Tc and [Formula: see text]Lu SPECT quantification. Phantom experiments using [Formula: see text]Tc and [Formula: see text]Lu have been performed to measure spatial resolution and sensitivity, as well as to evaluate the CF and RC from acquired data. The geometries used for 2D planar imaging were (1) Petri dish and (2) capillary source while for 3D volumetric imaging were (3) a uniform filled cylinder phantom and (4) a Jaszczack phantom with spheres of different volumes. The experimental results have been compared with the results obtained from Monte Carlo simulations performed in the same geometries. Comparison shows good accordance between simulated and experimental data. The measured planar spatial resolution was 8.3[Formula: see text] mm for [Formula: see text]Tc and 11.8±0.6 mm for [Formula: see text]Lu. The corresponding data obtained by SIMIND for [Formula: see text]Tc was 7.8±0.1 mm, while for [Formula: see text]Lu was 12.4±0.4 mm. The CF was 110.1±5.5 cps/MBq for Technetium and 18.3±1.0 cps/MBq for Lutetium. The corresponding CF obtained by SIMIND for [Formula: see text]Tc was 107.3±0.3 cps/MBq, while for [Formula: see text]Lu 20.4±0.7 cps/MBq. Moreover, a complete curve RCs vs Volume (ml) both for Technetium and Lutetium was determined to correct the PVE for all volumes of clinical interest. In none of the cases, a RC coefficient equal to 100 was found. The validation of quantification parameters shows that SIMIND can be used for simulating both gamma camera planar and SPECT images of Siemens Symbia Intevo using [Formula: see text]Tc and [Formula: see text]Lu radionuclides for different medical purposes and treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37029829
doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00547-6
pii: 10.1186/s40658-023-00547-6
pmc: PMC10082889
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

27

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Nucl Med. 2010 Jun;51(6):921-8
pubmed: 20484423
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 10;7(2):e06097
pubmed: 33659726
Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):585-93
pubmed: 25475521
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Sep 10;63(18):185005
pubmed: 30113313
Phys Med. 2017 Sep;41:117-123
pubmed: 28457786
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Sep 13;13(9):
pubmed: 34575538
EJNMMI Phys. 2019 Dec 26;6(1):29
pubmed: 31879813
Heliyon. 2021 May 31;7(6):e07196
pubmed: 34141944
Appl Radiat Isot. 2007 Aug;65(8):918-26
pubmed: 17485218
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 May 2;5(1):8
pubmed: 29717385
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Feb;32(2):295-305
pubmed: 23086521
J Med Phys. 2010 Jan;35(1):42-7
pubmed: 20177569
Med Phys. 1999 Apr;26(4):574-608
pubmed: 10227362
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Mar;35(3):611-23
pubmed: 17929014
Appl Radiat Isot. 2020 Sep;163:109200
pubmed: 32561041
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601-9
pubmed: 18218538
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Feb 14;7(1):10
pubmed: 32060777
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jun 21;53(12):3099-112
pubmed: 18495976

Auteurs

Giovanni Di Domenico (G)

Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, via Saragat 1, 44122, Ferrara, IT, Italy. ddmgnn@unife.it.

Simona Di Biaso (S)

Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, via Saragat 1, 44122, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

Lorenzo Longo (L)

Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, via Saragat 1, 44122, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

Alessandro Turra (A)

Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital, 44124, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

Eugenia Tonini (E)

Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital, 44124, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

MariaConcetta Longo (M)

San Bortolo Hospital, 44124, Vicenza, IT, Italy.

Licia Uccelli (L)

Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital, 44124, Ferrara, IT, Italy.
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara, 70 c/o viale Eliporto, 44124, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

Mirco Bartolomei (M)

Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital, 44124, Ferrara, IT, Italy.

Classifications MeSH