Urinary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated in the "Modern Era": A Multicenter Retrospective Review.

Modern era treatment Poorly differentiated bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma Poorly differentiated urinary neuroendocrine carcinoma Well-differentiated renal neuroendocrine tumors Well-differentiated urinary neuroendocrine tumor

Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 23 01 2023
accepted: 15 02 2023
medline: 29 5 2023
pubmed: 9 4 2023
entrez: 8 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy. A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology. A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary). This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology.
RESULTS
A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary).
CONCLUSION
This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37031047
pii: S1558-7673(23)00042-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

403-414.e5

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Bryan Khuong Le (BK)

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Patrick McGarrah (P)

Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Alan Paciorek (A)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Amr Mohamed (A)

UH Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

Andrea B Apolo (AB)

Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

David L Chan (DL)

Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Diane Reidy-Lagunes (D)

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Haley Hauser (H)

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Jaydira D Rivero (JD)

Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Julia Whitman (J)

Vanderbilt University.

Kathleen Batty (K)

Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Li Zhang (L)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Nitya Raj (N)

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Tiffany Le (T)

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Emily Bergsland (E)

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: emily.bergsland@ucsf.edu.

Thorvardur R Halfdanarson (TR)

Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH