MRI hip morphology is abnormal in unilateral DDH and increased lateral limbus thickness is associated with residual DDH at minimum 10-year follow-up.

Post-reduction MRI developmental dysplasia of the hip hip hip MRI surgical hip reduction

Journal

Journal of children's orthopaedics
ISSN: 1863-2521
Titre abrégé: J Child Orthop
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101313582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 14 06 2022
accepted: 20 11 2022
medline: 11 4 2023
entrez: 10 4 2023
pubmed: 11 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of the study was to compare the post-reduction magnetic resonance imaging morphology for hips that developed residual acetabular dysplasia, hips without residual dysplasia, and uninvolved contralateral hips in patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing closed or open reduction and had a minimum 10-year follow-up. Retrospective study of patients with unilateral dysplasia of the hip who underwent open/closed hip reduction followed by post-reduction magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-eight patients with a mean follow-up of 13 ± 3 years were included. In the treated hips, residual dysplasia was defined as subsequent surgery for residual acetabular dysplasia or for Severin grade > 2 at latest follow-up. On post-reduction, magnetic resonance imaging measurements were performed by two readers and compared between the hips with/without residual dysplasia and the contralateral uninvolved side. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements included acetabular version, coronal/ axial femoroacetabular distance, acetabular depth-width ratio, osseous/cartilaginous acetabular indices, and medial/lateral (limbus) cartilage thickness. Fifteen (54%) and 13 (46%) hips were allocated to the "no residual dysplasia" group and to the "residual dysplasia" group, respectively. All eight magnetic resonance imaging parameters differed between hips with residual dysplasia and contralateral uninvolved hips (all p < 0.05). Six of eight parameters differed (all p < 0.05) between hips with and without residual dysplasia. Among these, increased limbus thickness had the largest effect (odds ratio = 12.5; p < 0.001) for increased likelihood of residual dysplasia. We identified acetabular morphology and reduction quality parameters that can be reliably measured on the post-reduction magnetic resonance imaging to facilitate the differentiation between hips that develop with/without residual acetabular dysplasia at 10 years postoperatively. level III, prognostic case-control study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37034197
doi: 10.1177/18632521221144060
pii: 10.1177_18632521221144060
pmc: PMC10080238
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

86-96

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Sep;31(6):633-7
pubmed: 21841437
Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Feb;39(2):161-3
pubmed: 19052737
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):92-100
pubmed: 11744862
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):778-85
pubmed: 16857978
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Jul;123(6):289-92
pubmed: 12783242
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Mar;38(3):163-169
pubmed: 27261963
Radiographics. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):840-54
pubmed: 27035836
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950 Jul;32-A(3):507-18
pubmed: 15428473
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Sep;62(6):876-88
pubmed: 7430175
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(5):525-9
pubmed: 21654460
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Oct;39(9):449-452
pubmed: 31503229
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):14-20
pubmed: 19098638
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 Nov;25(6):489-92
pubmed: 27135219
Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:531-42
pubmed: 15116642
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Oct-Nov;34(7):674-8
pubmed: 24686300
Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Sep;86(2):127-37
pubmed: 7315877
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e7013
pubmed: 28538419
J Child Orthop. 2012 Mar;6(1):13-20
pubmed: 23449088
Hip Int. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):405-16
pubmed: 24970320
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jul;60(5):586-99
pubmed: 681377
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(5):504-9
pubmed: 22706467
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):948-52
pubmed: 17673592

Auteurs

Florian Schmaranzer (F)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Pedro Justo (P)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Jennifer R Kallini (JR)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Marianna G Ferrer (MG)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Patricia E Miller (PE)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Travis Matheney (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Sarah D Bixby (SD)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Eduardo N Novais (EN)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Classifications MeSH