CT-based Machine Learning for Donor Lung Screening Prior to Transplantation.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2023
29 Mar 2023
Historique:
medline:
11
4
2023
entrez:
10
4
2023
pubmed:
11
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Assessment and selection of donor lungs remains largely subjective and experience based. Criteria to accept or decline lungs are poorly standardized and are not compliant with the current donor pool. Using ex vivo CT images, we investigated the use of a CT-based machine learning algorithm for screening donor lungs prior to transplantation. Clinical measures and ex-situ CT scans were collected from 100 cases as part of a prospective clinical trial. Following procurement, donor lungs were inflated, placed on ice according to routine clinical practice, and imaged using a clinical CT scanner prior to transplantation while stored in the icebox. We trained and tested a supervised machine learning method called Of the 100 lung pairs donated, 70 were considered acceptable for transplantation (based on standard clinical assessment) prior to CT screening and were consequently implanted. The remaining 30 pairs were screened but not transplanted. Our machine learning algorithm was able to detect pulmonary abnormalities on the CT scans. Among the patients who received donor lungs, our algorithm identified recipients who had extended stays in the ICU and were at 19 times higher risk of developing CLAD within 2 years post-transplant. We have created a strategy to ex vivo screen donor lungs using a CT-based machine learning algorithm. As the use of suboptimal donor lungs rises, it is important to have in place objective techniques that will assist physicians in accurately screening donor lungs to identify recipients most at risk of post-transplant complications.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Assessment and selection of donor lungs remains largely subjective and experience based. Criteria to accept or decline lungs are poorly standardized and are not compliant with the current donor pool. Using ex vivo CT images, we investigated the use of a CT-based machine learning algorithm for screening donor lungs prior to transplantation.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Clinical measures and ex-situ CT scans were collected from 100 cases as part of a prospective clinical trial. Following procurement, donor lungs were inflated, placed on ice according to routine clinical practice, and imaged using a clinical CT scanner prior to transplantation while stored in the icebox. We trained and tested a supervised machine learning method called
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of the 100 lung pairs donated, 70 were considered acceptable for transplantation (based on standard clinical assessment) prior to CT screening and were consequently implanted. The remaining 30 pairs were screened but not transplanted. Our machine learning algorithm was able to detect pulmonary abnormalities on the CT scans. Among the patients who received donor lungs, our algorithm identified recipients who had extended stays in the ICU and were at 19 times higher risk of developing CLAD within 2 years post-transplant.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
We have created a strategy to ex vivo screen donor lungs using a CT-based machine learning algorithm. As the use of suboptimal donor lungs rises, it is important to have in place objective techniques that will assist physicians in accurately screening donor lungs to identify recipients most at risk of post-transplant complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37034670
doi: 10.1101/2023.03.28.23287705
pmc: PMC10081423
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL139690
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL150023
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1156-65
pubmed: 27492670
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003 Nov;22(11):1183-200
pubmed: 14585380
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;157(4):1711-1718.e1
pubmed: 30772037
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):434-444
pubmed: 31793851
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jan;83(1):257-63
pubmed: 17184674
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1097-1103
pubmed: 28942784
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;50(5):826-831
pubmed: 27242362
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Aug;53(8):831-7
pubmed: 16873351
Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1435-1443
pubmed: 25940255
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248902
pubmed: 33760861
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009 Jan 15;6(1):28-38
pubmed: 19131528
J Thorac Imaging. 2017 Mar;32(2):107-114
pubmed: 28060192
Hepatology. 2020 Mar;71(3):1093-1105
pubmed: 31907954
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;50(5):832-833
pubmed: 27440907
Transplantation. 2021 Apr 1;105(4):723-735
pubmed: 32826798
Transpl Int. 2011 Apr;24(4):393-400
pubmed: 21155901
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jul;17(7):1912-1921
pubmed: 28251829
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun;103(6):e535-e537
pubmed: 28528061
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Aug;27(8):961-966
pubmed: 29525135
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jun;20(6):1712-1719
pubmed: 31985888
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):13-7
pubmed: 20106357
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5485-5494
pubmed: 33209382