Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.
GBLUP
Genomic selection (GS)
conifers
growth traits
mate allocation
non-additive genetic effects
tree breeding programs
wood quality traits
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
04
01
2023
accepted:
14
02
2023
medline:
11
4
2023
entrez:
10
4
2023
pubmed:
11
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genomic selection is becoming a standard technique in plant breeding and is now being introduced into forest tree breeding. Despite promising results to predict the genetic merit of superior material based on their additive breeding values, many studies and operational programs still neglect non-additive effects and their potential for enhancing genetic gains. Using two large comprehensive datasets totaling 4,066 trees from 146 full-sib families of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss), we evaluated the effect of the inclusion of dominance on the precision of genetic parameter estimates and on the accuracy of conventional pedigree-based (ABLUP-AD) and genomic-based (GBLUP-AD) models. While wood quality traits were mostly additively inherited, considerable non-additive effects and lower heritabilities were detected for growth traits. For growth, GBLUP-AD better partitioned the additive and dominance effects into roughly equal variances, while ABLUP-AD strongly overestimated dominance. The predictive abilities of breeding and total genetic value estimates were similar between ABLUP-AD and GBLUP-AD when predicting individuals from the same families as those included in the training dataset. However, GBLUP-AD outperformed ABLUP-AD when predicting for new unphenotyped families that were not represented in the training dataset, with, on average, 22% and 53% higher predictive ability of breeding and genetic values, respectively. Resampling simulations showed that GBLUP-AD required smaller sample sizes than ABLUP-AD to produce precise estimates of genetic variances and accurate predictions of genetic values. Still, regardless of the method used, large training datasets were needed to estimate additive and non-additive genetic variances precisely. This study highlights the different quantitative genetic architectures between growth and wood traits. Furthermore, the usefulness of genomic additive-dominance models for predicting new families should allow practicing mating allocation to maximize the total genetic values for the propagation of elite material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37035077
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137834
pmc: PMC10073444
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1137834Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Nadeau, Beaulieu, Gezan, Perron, Bousquet and Lenz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Author SG was employed by VSN International Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 02;15:1048
pubmed: 25442968
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Jan;15(1):22-33
pubmed: 24296533
Front Genet. 2016 Dec 27;7:221
pubmed: 28083016
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 28;11:581954
pubmed: 33193528
Genetics. 2013 Dec;195(4):1223-30
pubmed: 24121775
Plant Genome. 2016 Nov;9(3):
pubmed: 27902800
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Feb 4;12(2):
pubmed: 34849838
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Aug 11;42:33
pubmed: 20699012
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):
pubmed: 34791210
Evol Appl. 2019 Dec 29;13(1):31-47
pubmed: 31892942
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 08;9(1):e85792
pubmed: 24416447
Mol Ecol. 2001 Nov;10(11):2729-40
pubmed: 11883886
Theor Appl Genet. 1988 Nov;76(5):788-94
pubmed: 24232359
Evol Appl. 2022 Aug 23;15(8):1291-1312
pubmed: 36051463
J Hered. 2016 Mar;107(2):153-62
pubmed: 26712858
Evol Appl. 2022 Feb 28;15(3):383-402
pubmed: 35386396
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45293
pubmed: 23028912
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2739-2748
pubmed: 31263059
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Oct 5;10(10):3751-3763
pubmed: 32788286
BMC Genomics. 2017 Apr 28;18(1):335
pubmed: 28454519
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Jul;117(1):33-41
pubmed: 27118156
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 01;9(8):e103934
pubmed: 25084281
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Jul;121(1):24-37
pubmed: 29472694
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43
pubmed: 19164653
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):3933
pubmed: 35273188
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Oct;119(4):245-255
pubmed: 28900291
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 07;12:666820
pubmed: 34305966
PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 3;12(11):e1006421
pubmed: 27812106
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Jun 24;46:40
pubmed: 24962065
Mol Breed. 2018;38(3):26
pubmed: 29491726
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Mar;133(3):1009-1018
pubmed: 31907563
Genetics. 2011 May;188(1):197-214
pubmed: 21385726
Plant Sci. 2018 Feb;267:84-93
pubmed: 29362102
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Sep 6;11(9):
pubmed: 34544145
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4656-63
pubmed: 19700729
Genetics. 2008 Sep;180(1):611-8
pubmed: 18757934
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Jan 22;6(3):743-53
pubmed: 26801647
New Phytol. 2020 Jul;227(2):427-439
pubmed: 32173867
BMC Genomics. 2015 May 09;16:370
pubmed: 25956247
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1297-1307
pubmed: 28522540
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Feb 01;48:8
pubmed: 26830030
Evol Appl. 2019 Jun 20;13(1):76-94
pubmed: 31892945
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 26;12:638969
pubmed: 33719317
PLoS Genet. 2008 Feb 29;4(2):e1000008
pubmed: 18454194
Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):355-67
pubmed: 24990992
Evol Appl. 2020 Aug 11;13(10):2704-2722
pubmed: 33294018
Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1759-68
pubmed: 25324160
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Apr;108(6):1113-9
pubmed: 15067398
BMC Genomics. 2022 Jul 23;23(1):536
pubmed: 35870886
BMC Genomics. 2018 Dec 18;19(1):946
pubmed: 30563448
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 16;11:592977
pubmed: 33391305
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Feb;100(2):1203-1222
pubmed: 27939540
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Feb;116(2):146-57
pubmed: 26328760
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Apr;124(4):562-578
pubmed: 31969718
Plant Sci. 2016 Jan;242:108-119
pubmed: 26566829
Front Genet. 2018 Mar 06;9:78
pubmed: 29559995
Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Jul;93(1-2):102-9
pubmed: 24162206
J Hered. 2019 Dec 17;110(7):830-843
pubmed: 31629368
New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(1):116-128
pubmed: 22309312
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):331-41
pubmed: 18076470
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Oct;113(4):343-52
pubmed: 24781808
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208232
pubmed: 30532178