Gender differences in active travel in major cities across the world.

Active travel Age Cycling Gender Physical activity Public transportation Walking

Journal

Transportation
ISSN: 0049-4488
Titre abrégé: Transportation (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101536081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
medline: 11 4 2023
entrez: 10 4 2023
pubmed: 11 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is lack of literature on international comparison of gender differences in the use of active travel modes. We used population-representative travel surveys for 19 major cities across 13 countries and 6 continents, representing a mix of cites from low-and-middle income (n = 8) and high-income countries (n = 11). In all the cities, females are more likely than males to walk and, in most cities, more likely to use public transport. This relationship reverses in cycling, with females often less likely users than males. In high cycling cities, both genders are equally likely to cycle. Active travel to access public transport contributes 30-50% of total active travel time. The gender differences in active travel metrics are age dependent. Among children (< 16 years), these metrics are often equal for girls and boys, while gender disparity increases with age. On average, active travel enables one in every four people in the population to achieve at least 30 min of physical activity in a day, though there is large variation across the cities. In general, females are more likely to achieve this level than males. The results highlight the importance of a gendered approach towards active transport policies. Such an approach necessitates reducing road traffic danger and male violence, as well as overcoming social norms that restrict women from cycling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37035250
doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10259-4
pmc: PMC7614415
mid: EMS141041
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

733-749

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023187/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12015/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 16/137/34
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00006/7
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 817754
Pays : International

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

Prev Med. 2012 Sep;55(3):206-11
pubmed: 22796629
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):273-80
pubmed: 16242589
Prev Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):134-9
pubmed: 22182478
Transp Rev. 2017 Jan 2;37(1):29-55
pubmed: 28190905
J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jul 13;18(10):1163-1180
pubmed: 34257157
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):222-230
pubmed: 29893886
Prev Med. 2008 Jan;46(1):55-9
pubmed: 17698185
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):541-556
pubmed: 28708630
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7834):402-407
pubmed: 33208961
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2454-78
pubmed: 22851954
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462
pubmed: 33239350
Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):338-41
pubmed: 18436296
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 3:1-72
pubmed: 26606383

Auteurs

Rahul Goel (R)

Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Oyinlola Oyebode (O)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.

Louise Foley (L)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Lambed Tatah (L)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Christopher Millett (C)

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

James Woodcock (J)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Classifications MeSH