Evaluation of the range of motion of scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints: State of the art.
Shoulder complex
acromioclavicular
scapulothoracic
sternoclavicular
Journal
Shoulder & elbow
ISSN: 1758-5732
Titre abrégé: Shoulder Elbow
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506589
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
10
12
2021
revised:
03
03
2022
accepted:
10
03
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
11
4
2023
entrez:
10
4
2023
pubmed:
11
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints play a fundamental role in the shoulder function. Shoulder complex kinematics have been studied with different methods using: goniometers, 2 static radiographs, 3D motion analyzers (invasive or noninvasive) and digital inclinometers. Goniometers have been used traditionally to assess scapular rotation in relation to the thorax. The intrinsic limit of multiple static two-dimensional shoulder radiographs is the attempt of describing in two what is occurring in three dimensions. Technology innovations have led to the development of the 3D shoulder complex kinematics analysis ETS (Electromagnetic tracking systems) using sensors (invasive bone-pin markers or noninvasive skin surface marker) stitched to the scapula/clavicula, thorax, and humerus. Despite being uncomfortable, invasive 3D motion cortical pins analyzers still represent the current gold standard for tracking shoulder complex kinematics. Therefore, access to three-dimensional biomechanical instrumentations for collecting kinematic data represents an active problem for many physicians. A precise, easy to use and low-cost non-invasive method able to draw and analyze the kinematics of the shoulder complex has not been developed yet. Further researches are necessary to design a new non-invasive method able to draw and analyze the kinematics of the scapula and the whole shoulder complex, precisely.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37035616
doi: 10.1177/17585732221090226
pii: 10.1177_17585732221090226
pmc: PMC10078813
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
132-139Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Apr;44(4):321-330
pubmed: 30292717
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1679-1692
pubmed: 33540119
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1643-7
pubmed: 16735587
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):150-62
pubmed: 17113324
Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jul;26:64-89
pubmed: 28237770
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):181-90
pubmed: 18434666
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Jun 21;8:49
pubmed: 17584933
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):546-556
pubmed: 33155568
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0227313
pubmed: 31887210
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(11):883-90
pubmed: 22821720
Anat Res Int. 2013;2013:635628
pubmed: 24369502
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1993 Sep;8(5):269-73
pubmed: 23915988
World J Orthop. 2015 Nov 18;6(10):783-94
pubmed: 26601060
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002 Nov-Dec;17(9-10):650-9
pubmed: 12446161
Shoulder Elbow. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):93-99
pubmed: 24834133
J Biomech Eng. 2001 Apr;123(2):184-90
pubmed: 11340880
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;47(14):877-85
pubmed: 23580420
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91(2):378-89
pubmed: 19181982
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;20(6):364-72
pubmed: 22661566
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):269-77
pubmed: 11408911
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Mar;34(3):140-9
pubmed: 15089027
Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 May-Jun;18(3):282-9
pubmed: 25003282
J Orthop Res. 2006 Sep;24(9):1823-31
pubmed: 16838361
Hand (N Y). 2012 Dec;7(4):400-6
pubmed: 24294160
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 06;11(1):e0141028
pubmed: 26734761
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Mar;19(2):209-15
pubmed: 19995681