Potential impacts of climate change on the productivity and soil carbon stocks of managed grasslands.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
accepted:
07
03
2023
medline:
12
4
2023
entrez:
10
4
2023
pubmed:
11
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rain-fed pastoral systems are tightly connected to meteorological conditions. It is, therefore, likely that climate change, including changing atmospheric CO2 concentration, temperature, precipitation and patterns of climate extremes, will greatly affect pastoral systems. However, exact impacts on the productivity and carbon dynamics of these systems are still poorly understood, particularly over longtime scales. The present study assesses the potential effects of future climatic conditions on productivity and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of mowed and rotationally grazed grasslands in France. We used the CenW ecosystem model to simulate carbon, water, and nitrogen cycles in response to changes in environmental drivers and management practices. We first evaluated model responses to individual changes in each key meteorological variable to get better insights into the role and importance of each individual variable. Then, we used 3 sets of meteorological variables corresponding to 3 Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) for long-term model runs from 1975 to 2100. Finally, we used the same three RCPs to analyze the responses of modelled grasslands to extreme climate events. We found that increasing temperature slightly increased grasslands productivities but strongly reduced SOC stocks. A reduction in precipitation led to reductions of biomass and milk production but increased SOC. Conversely, doubling CO2 concentration strongly increased biomass and milk production and marginally reduced SOC. These SOC trends were unexpected. They arose because both increasing precipitation and CO2 increased photosynthetic carbon gain, but they had an even greater effect on the proportion of biomass that could be grazed. The amount of carbon remaining on site and able to contribute to SOC formation was actually reduced under both higher precipitation and CO2. The simulations under the three RCPs indicated that grassland productivity was increased, but that required higher N fertilizer application rates and also led to substantial SOC losses. We thus conclude that, while milk productivity may continue at current rates under climate change, or even increase slightly, there could be some soil C losses over the 21st century. In addition, under the highest-emission scenario, the increasing importance of extreme climate conditions (heat waves and droughts) might render conditions at our site in some years as unsuitable for milk production. It highlights the importance of tailoring farming practices to achieve the dual goals of maintaining agricultural production while safeguarding soil C stocks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37036870
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283370
pii: PONE-D-22-17085
pmc: PMC10085015
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Carbon
7440-44-0
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0283370Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Puche et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Aug;21(8):2861-80
pubmed: 25752680
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 25;745:140917
pubmed: 32726704
Oecologia. 2009 Mar;159(3):571-81
pubmed: 19034525
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:267-278
pubmed: 27829504
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jul 27;7:1130
pubmed: 27512406
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 31;113(22):6224-9
pubmed: 27185934
Nature. 2016 Apr 7;532(7597):49-57
pubmed: 27078564
Carbon Balance Manag. 2017 Dec;12(1):11
pubmed: 28474332
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2835-51
pubmed: 20713388
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:851-864
pubmed: 27259038
Science. 2002 Dec 6;298(5600):1987-90
pubmed: 12471257
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Oct;23(10):4376-4385
pubmed: 28370946
Science. 2018 Aug 31;361(6405):920-923
pubmed: 30166491
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7734):32-34
pubmed: 30510229
AoB Plants. 2015 Mar 30;7:
pubmed: 25829380
Oecologia. 2004 Jun;140(1):11-25
pubmed: 15156395
Ecol Appl. 2017 Mar;27(2):662-668
pubmed: 27875004
New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):351-71
pubmed: 15720649
Animal. 2010 Mar;4(3):334-50
pubmed: 22443939
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 15;512-513:273-286
pubmed: 25634732
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26842
pubmed: 22046376
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1008-28
pubmed: 26301476
J Environ Qual. 2008 Jun 23;37(4):1383-9
pubmed: 18574169
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:398-407
pubmed: 29753228
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 17;369(1639):20120273
pubmed: 24535385
Oecologia. 2001 May;127(3):383-394
pubmed: 28547109
Nature. 2014 Jul 31;511(7511):583-6
pubmed: 24870242
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):319-331
pubmed: 11841673
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:61-72
pubmed: 27751689