A Qualitative Assessment of Community Acceptability and Its Determinants in the Implementation of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling in Children in Quelimane City, Mozambique.
Journal
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
ISSN: 1476-1645
Titre abrégé: Am J Trop Med Hyg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370507
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2023
02 05 2023
Historique:
received:
20
05
2022
accepted:
19
11
2022
medline:
5
5
2023
pubmed:
11
4
2023
entrez:
10
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action project aims to implement a child mortality surveillance program through strengthening vital registration event reporting (pregnancy, birth, and death) and investigating causes of death (CODs) based on verbal autopsies. In Quelimane (central Mozambique), Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) procedures were added to fine-tune the COD approaches. Before the implementation of MITS, an evaluation of the acceptability and ethical considerations of child mortality surveillance was considered fundamental. A socio-anthropological study was conducted in Quelimane, using observations, informal conversations, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions with healthcare providers, nharrubes (traditional authorities who handle bodies before the funeral), community and religious leaders, and traditional birth attendants to understand the locally relevant potential facilitators and barriers to the acceptability of MITS. Audio materials were transcribed, systematically coded, and analyzed using NVIVO12®. The desire to know the COD, intention to discharge the elders from accusations of witchcraft, involvement of leaders in disseminating project information, and provision of transport for bodies back to the community constitute potential facilitators for the acceptability of MITS implementation. In contrast, poor community mobilization, disagreement with Islamic religious practices, and local traditional beliefs were identified as potential barriers. MITS was considered a positive innovation to determine the COD, although community members remain skeptical about the procedure due to tensions with religion and tradition. Therefore, the implementation of MITS in Quelimane should prioritize the involvement of a variety of influential community and religious leaders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37037431
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0343
pii: tpmd220343
pmc: PMC10160860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
56-65Références
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Mar;57(3):378-9
pubmed: 21402974
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S262-S273
pubmed: 31598664
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Nov;40:1923-31
pubmed: 7841824
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002317
pubmed: 28632739
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246369
pubmed: 33539411
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259621
pubmed: 34748582
Reprod Health. 2019 May 10;16(1):53
pubmed: 31077244
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 9;16(1):3
pubmed: 30626421
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan;59 Suppl 1:S110-7
pubmed: 24588912
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002318
pubmed: 28632735
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e44
pubmed: 18288887
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 13;15:263
pubmed: 26463456
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S291-S301
pubmed: 31598657
J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Mar;23:80-3
pubmed: 24661712
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002173
pubmed: 27875535
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 30;18(9):e1003814
pubmed: 34591862
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002172
pubmed: 27875532
Malar J. 2019 Jan 25;18(1):27
pubmed: 30683091
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 15;14:3421-3427
pubmed: 34938081
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 13;12:10
pubmed: 21668979
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 May;132(1):3-7
pubmed: 17129657
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 03;3(2):e000639
pubmed: 29736271
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 15;73(Suppl_5):S422-S429
pubmed: 34910175
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e35-e36
pubmed: 31839138
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0244552
pubmed: 33507902