The presence, nature and network characteristics of behavioural phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy.
behaviour
phenotypes
psychopathology
temporal lobe epilepsy
Journal
Brain communications
ISSN: 2632-1297
Titre abrégé: Brain Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101755125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2022
revised:
25
01
2023
accepted:
29
03
2023
medline:
12
4
2023
entrez:
11
4
2023
pubmed:
12
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The relationship between temporal lobe epilepsy and psychopathology has had a long and contentious history with diverse views regarding the presence, nature and severity of emotional-behavioural problems in this patient population. To address these controversies, we take a new person-centred approach through the application of unsupervised machine learning techniques to identify underlying latent groups or behavioural phenotypes. Addressed are the distinct psychopathological profiles, their linked frequency, patterns and severity and the disruptions in morphological and network properties that underlie the identified latent groups. A total of 114 patients and 83 controls from the Epilepsy Connectome Project were administered the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment inventory from which six Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-oriented scales were analysed by unsupervised machine learning analytics to identify latent patient groups. Identified clusters were contrasted to controls as well as to each other in order to characterize their association with sociodemographic, clinical epilepsy and morphological and functional imaging network features. The concurrent validity of the behavioural phenotypes was examined through other measures of behaviour and quality of life. Patients overall exhibited significantly higher (abnormal) scores compared with controls. However, cluster analysis identified three latent groups: (i) unaffected, with no scale elevations compared with controls (Cluster 1, 37%); (ii) mild symptomatology characterized by significant elevations across several Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-oriented scales compared with controls (Cluster 2, 42%); and (iii) severe symptomatology with significant elevations across all scales compared with controls and the other temporal lobe epilepsy behaviour phenotype groups (Cluster 3, 21%). Concurrent validity of the behavioural phenotype grouping was demonstrated through identical stepwise links to abnormalities on independent measures including the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotion Battery and quality of life metrics. There were significant associations between cluster membership and sociodemographic (handedness and education), cognition (processing speed), clinical epilepsy (presence and lifetime number of tonic-clonic seizures) and neuroimaging characteristics (cortical volume and thickness and global graph theory metrics of morphology and resting-state functional MRI). Increasingly dispersed volumetric abnormalities and widespread disruptions in underlying network properties were associated with the most abnormal behavioural phenotype. Psychopathology in these patients is characterized by a series of discrete latent groups that harbour accompanying sociodemographic, clinical and neuroimaging correlates. The underlying neurobiological patterns suggest that the degree of psychopathology is linked to increasingly dispersed abnormal brain networks. Similar to cognition, machine learning approaches support a novel developing taxonomy of the comorbidities of epilepsy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37038499
doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad095
pii: fcad095
pmc: PMC10082555
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
fcad095Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no competing interests.
Références
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102341
pubmed: 32707534
Epilepsia. 2020 Jul;61(7):1427-1437
pubmed: 32557544
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S76-86
pubmed: 23479549
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24
pubmed: 23668970
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 27;10(10):e0141186
pubmed: 26505900
Epilepsy Behav. 2003 Apr;4(2):118-23
pubmed: 12697135
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Apr;117:107841
pubmed: 33611101
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
Epilepsia. 1970 Dec;11(4):345-59
pubmed: 4395977
Neurology. 1984 May;34(5):591-6
pubmed: 6538652
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Mar;77(3 Pt 2):036114
pubmed: 18517468
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Dec;17(12):731-746
pubmed: 34552218
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S54-64
pubmed: 23479546
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):344-356
pubmed: 31294865
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Oct;25(2):266-76
pubmed: 23041175
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11050-5
pubmed: 10984517
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Mar;6(2):282-91
pubmed: 15710320
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:41-52
pubmed: 30927560
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
pubmed: 8812068
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;140:236-43
pubmed: 6807385
Arch Neurol. 1977 Aug;34(8):454-67
pubmed: 889477
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
J Consult Psychol. 1959 Apr;23(2):155-9
pubmed: 13641512
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11-22
pubmed: 14654453
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2022 Apr 1;28(2):457-482
pubmed: 35393966
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:144-68
pubmed: 23702415
Br J Psychiatry. 1974 Sep;125(0):221-9
pubmed: 4153963
Epilepsia. 1969 Sep;10(3):363-95
pubmed: 5256909
Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1948 Oct;60(4):331-9
pubmed: 18111213
Epilepsia. 2022 May;63(5):1177-1188
pubmed: 35174484
Epilepsia Open. 2021 Jun;6(2):369-380
pubmed: 34033251
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):70-80
pubmed: 11293693
Neuroscientist. 2022 Feb 22;:10738584221076133
pubmed: 35193421
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 Mar 15;9:115-127
pubmed: 29588623
Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Jun 07;4:16
pubmed: 20589099
Nature. 2016 Aug 11;536(7615):171-178
pubmed: 27437579