Impact of donor ventricular function on heart transplantation outcomes.

LVEF UNOS donor age donor left ventricular ejection fraction donor pool heart transplant ischemic time left ventricular ejection fraction survival outcome

Journal

Clinical transplantation
ISSN: 1399-0012
Titre abrégé: Clin Transplant
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 8710240

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
revised: 25 03 2023
received: 06 02 2023
accepted: 28 03 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
pubmed: 12 4 2023
entrez: 11 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Some heart transplant (HTx) centers have expanded their donor eligibility criteria in response to the organ shortage; one area of active interest involves utilizing hearts with ventricular dysfunction. Our study seeks to identify if a relationship exists between donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic time or donor age on HTx outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis on adult patients who had a HTx between 1996 and 2021 (n = 46,936). Donor LVEF (dLVEF) values were categorized into three groups: <50%, 50%-70%, and >70%. Ischemic time and donor age were stratified into four groups: ≤2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, >4.0 h, and ≤30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years, respectively. The outcome of interest was long-term survival. Multivariable survival analysis found a slight increase in overall mortality risk for patients with donor ejection fractions <50% (HR = 1.16, p = .013). However, subsequent subgroup investigation discovered that this elevated hazard was only applicable when ischemic time was prolonged to >3.0 h (3.1-4.0 h: HR = 1.23, p = .024; > 4.0 h: HR = 1.52, p < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between dLVEF groups when ischemic time was limited to ≤3.0 h or when stratified by donor age. HTx patients with a low donor ejection fraction have comparable survival to recipients with a normal dLVEF when ischemic time is limited to ≤3.0 h. Reduced dLVEF does not appear to be sensitive to advanced donor age. The clinical implications of our study may encourage the recruitment of more donor hearts for transplantation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Some heart transplant (HTx) centers have expanded their donor eligibility criteria in response to the organ shortage; one area of active interest involves utilizing hearts with ventricular dysfunction. Our study seeks to identify if a relationship exists between donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic time or donor age on HTx outcomes.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis on adult patients who had a HTx between 1996 and 2021 (n = 46,936). Donor LVEF (dLVEF) values were categorized into three groups: <50%, 50%-70%, and >70%. Ischemic time and donor age were stratified into four groups: ≤2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, >4.0 h, and ≤30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years, respectively. The outcome of interest was long-term survival.
RESULTS
Multivariable survival analysis found a slight increase in overall mortality risk for patients with donor ejection fractions <50% (HR = 1.16, p = .013). However, subsequent subgroup investigation discovered that this elevated hazard was only applicable when ischemic time was prolonged to >3.0 h (3.1-4.0 h: HR = 1.23, p = .024; > 4.0 h: HR = 1.52, p < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between dLVEF groups when ischemic time was limited to ≤3.0 h or when stratified by donor age.
CONCLUSION
HTx patients with a low donor ejection fraction have comparable survival to recipients with a normal dLVEF when ischemic time is limited to ≤3.0 h. Reduced dLVEF does not appear to be sensitive to advanced donor age. The clinical implications of our study may encourage the recruitment of more donor hearts for transplantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37039483
doi: 10.1111/ctr.14988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14988

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Kilic A, Emani S, Sai-Sudhakar CB, Higgins RS, Whitson BA. Donor selection in heart transplantation. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:1097-1104.
Chandola R, Mutsuga M, Norris C, Wang S. Stretching the cardiac donor ischemic time to beyond six hours: what's the impact? Clin Surg. 2017;2:1578.
Radovancevic B, Radovancevic R, Vrtovec B, Thomas CD, Frazier OH. Outcomes in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction after heart transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:743-747.
Sibona A, Khush KK, Oyoyo UE, et al. Long-term transplant outcomes of donor hearts with left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:1865-1875.
Madan S, Saeed O, Vlismas P, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of donor hearts with improving left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1248-1258.
Chen CW, Sprys MH, Gaffey AC, et al. Low ejection fraction in donor hearts is not directly associated with increased recipient mortality. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:611-615.
Oras J, Doueh R, Norberg E, Redfors B, Omerovic E, Dellgren G. Left ventricular dysfunction in potential heart donors and its influence on recipient outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159:1333-1341.
Kobashigawa J, Khush K, Colvin M, et al. Report from the American society of transplantation conference on donor heart selection in adult cardiac transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:2559-2566.
Tryon D, Hasaniya NW, Jabo B, Razzouk AJ, Bailey LL, Rabkin DG. Effect of left ventricular dysfunction on utilization of donor hearts. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:349-357.
Dharmavaram N, Hess T, Jaeger H, et al. National trends in heart donor usage rates: are we efficiently transplanting more hearts? J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e019655.
Russo MJ, Chen JM, Sorabella RA, et al. The effect of ischemic time on survival after heart transplantation varies by donor age: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:554-559.
Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1-23.
Davila AB, Shih W, Stoletniy LN, et al. Increased sensitivity to ischemic interval of donor hearts with diminished left ventricular function. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:241-247.
Heart Failure: An ACC Clinical Toolkit. Left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF assessment (outpatient setting). American College of Cardiology, 2014.
Mele D, Nardozza M, Ferrari R. Left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure: an indissoluble marriage? Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(3):427-430.
Pellikka PA, She L, Holly TA, et al. Variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, gated single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(4):e181456. Published 2018 Aug 3.
Cikes M, Solomon SD. Beyond ejection fraction: an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(21):1642-1650.
Babcock WD, Menza RL, Zaroff JG. Serial echocardiography increases donor heart utilization. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22(1):S74. Supplement.
Venkateswaran RV, Townend JN, Wilson IC, Mascaro JG, Bonser RS, Steeds RP. Echocardiography in the potential heart donor. Transplantation. 2010;89:894-901.
Zaroff JG, Babcock WD, Shiboski SC, Solinger LL, Rosengard BR. Temporal changes in left ventricular systolic function in heart donors: results of serial echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22:383-388.
Mohamedali B, Bhat G, Zelinger A. Frequency and pattern of left ventricular dysfunction in potential heart donors: implications regarding use of dysfunctional hearts for successful transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:235-236.
Rylski B, Berchtold-Herz M, Olschewski M, et al. Reducing the ischemic time of donor hearts will decrease morbidity and costs of cardiac transplantations. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:945-947.
Morgan JA, John R, Weinberg AD, et al. Prolonged donor ischemic time does not adversely affect long-term survival in adult patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1624-1633.
Mitropoulos FA, Odim J, Marelli D, et al. Outcome of hearts with cold ischemic time greater than 300 minutes. A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:143-148.
Reich HJ, Kobashigawa JA, Aintablian T, Ramzy D, Kittleson MM, Esmailian F. Effects of older donor age and cold ischemic time on long-term outcomes of heart transplantation. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018;45:17-22.
Strait JB, Lakatta EG. Aging-associated cardiovascular changes and their relationship to heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2012;8:143-164.
Wever Pinzon O, Stoddard G, Drakos SG, et al. Impact of donor left ventricular hypertrophy on survival after heart transplant. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2755-2761.

Auteurs

Ahad Firoz (A)

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Roh Yanagida (R)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Eman Hamad (E)

Heart and Vascular Institute, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Mohammed Kashem (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Yoshiya Toyoda (Y)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH