Secondary Reconstruction of Head and Neck Cancer Defects-Principles in its Practice.
Head and neck cancer defects
Salvage procedures
Secondary reconstruction
Virtual surgical planning
Journal
Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery
ISSN: 0972-8279
Titre abrégé: J Maxillofac Oral Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101538309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
26
01
2023
accepted:
15
02
2023
pmc-release:
01
03
2024
medline:
13
4
2023
entrez:
12
4
2023
pubmed:
13
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Secondary reconstruction is requested by patients who have completed their head and neck cancer treatment. The reason for the request for reconstruction may be to improve the functional deficits, achieve aesthetic refinements or most commonly both. The article looks at various issues related to reconstruction in the secondary setting and suggesting the ways to approaching patients requesting secondary reconstruction. While considering secondary reconstruction, various factors need to be considered. These include issues related to the disease, the treatment received as well as the patient's comorbid conditions. Aggressive disease and multiple recurrences should deter from undertaking complex reconstructions. Lack of tissue pliability resulting in a woody neck due to radiation makes dissection difficult and wound healing poor. The reconstructive requirements include release of contractures inside the mouth, reconstruction of the missing jaws, replacement of the missing volume of the tongue and correction of the incompetent angle of mouth. Goals of reconstruction should be prioritized by the surgical team. Free soft tissue or bone containing flaps would be provided ideal tissue to meet the reconstructive requirements in secondary reconstruction. However, several impediments could exist for their safe use. Release of contractures and provision of adequate soft tissue should be given priority and must be addressed before bony reconstruction is contemplated. Bony reconstruction of both mandible and maxilla is possible, with the former being more difficult to deliver good results due to the associated soft tissue fibrosis. Virtual surgical planning with the aid of Stereo lithographic models and planning software will improve the quality of bony reconstruction. Detailed counseling sessions involving patient and the family are essential before embarking on secondary reconstruction as the patient expectations and the surgical outcome may not be easy to match. However excellent improvement in function and appearance will be possible in many patients with appropriate reconstructive procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37041953
doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01875-x
pii: 1875
pmc: PMC10082886
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-9Informations de copyright
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interestNone.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e3329
pubmed: 33564573
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):121-7
pubmed: 25345755
BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):189
pubmed: 33836735
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1652-1658
pubmed: 30196862
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;28(2):129-135
pubmed: 32102005
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 19;11:718946
pubmed: 34737946
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S191-S197
pubmed: 27841135
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2019 Dec;12(4):274-283
pubmed: 31719952
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015 Oct 15;2(3-4):67-72
pubmed: 27252975
Semin Plast Surg. 2010 May;24(2):148-54
pubmed: 22550435
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jul;118(1):102-7
pubmed: 16816679
Head Neck. 2019 Sep;41(9):2929-2936
pubmed: 31017350
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Dec;15(4):425-441
pubmed: 27833334
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jul;62(7):889-95
pubmed: 18440289
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994 Mar;10(2):133-4
pubmed: 8182565
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e511-5
pubmed: 22551671
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Sep 24;7:162
pubmed: 23006548
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;51(4):319-25
pubmed: 22818045
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Oct;32(5):329-35
pubmed: 23326014
Lancet Oncol. 2003 Sep;4(9):529-36
pubmed: 12965273
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):453e-462e
pubmed: 31461040