The impact of land use on non-native species incidence and number in local assemblages worldwide.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 04 2023
12 04 2023
Historique:
received:
17
05
2022
accepted:
20
03
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
entrez:
12
4
2023
pubmed:
13
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While the regional distribution of non-native species is increasingly well documented for some taxa, global analyses of non-native species in local assemblages are still missing. Here, we use a worldwide collection of assemblages from five taxa - ants, birds, mammals, spiders and vascular plants - to assess whether the incidence, frequency and proportions of naturalised non-native species depend on type and intensity of land use. In plants, assemblages of primary vegetation are least invaded. In the other taxa, primary vegetation is among the least invaded land-use types, but one or several other types have equally low levels of occurrence, frequency and proportions of non-native species. High land use intensity is associated with higher non-native incidence and frequency in primary vegetation, while intensity effects are inconsistent for other land-use types. These findings highlight the potential dual role of unused primary vegetation in preserving native biodiversity and in conferring resistance against biological invasions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37045818
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37571-0
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-37571-0
pmc: PMC10097616
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2090Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):203-7
pubmed: 21173227
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Dec;95(6):1511-1534
pubmed: 32588508
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7799):393-396
pubmed: 32188954
Ecology. 2015 Dec;96(12):3363-73
pubmed: 26909441
Nature. 2017 May 31;546(7656):73-81
pubmed: 28569796
Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;4(24):4701-35
pubmed: 25558364
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 7;26(21):2929-2934
pubmed: 27618267
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017 Apr 28;68:563-586
pubmed: 28125286
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul;2(7):1071-1074
pubmed: 29784980
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 8;11(1):2892
pubmed: 32513984
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0227169
pubmed: 33270641
Ecology. 2021 Nov;102(11):e03474
pubmed: 34273183
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8
pubmed: 21592274
Nature. 2022 May;605(7908):97-102
pubmed: 35444282
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):571-576
pubmed: 33790468
Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):54-71
pubmed: 16594767
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):45-50
pubmed: 25832402
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 16;7(1):145-188
pubmed: 28070282
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):13756-13761
pubmed: 29203679
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jan 12;15(1):e2000942
pubmed: 28081142
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):615
pubmed: 35105884
Nature. 2016 Aug 10;536(7615):143-5
pubmed: 27510207
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 May;23(5):237-44
pubmed: 18367291
Ecology. 2019 Jan;100(1):e02542
pubmed: 30341991
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15307-12
pubmed: 24003123
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7804):496-501
pubmed: 32322063
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 15;8:14435
pubmed: 28198420
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Aug;93(3):1421-1437
pubmed: 29504240
Nature. 2014 May 8;509(7499):213-7
pubmed: 24739971
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct 1;:
pubmed: 33000893
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7763):103-106
pubmed: 31217580
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Sep;22(9):489-96
pubmed: 17673330
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):100-3
pubmed: 26287466
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1380-1389
pubmed: 29974602
Biodivers Data J. 2015 May 12;(3):e5063
pubmed: 26023286