Extended law of laplace for measurement of the cloverleaf anatomy of the aortic root.
Aorta
Aortic diameter
Aortic root
Computerized tomography
Sinuses of Valsalva
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
accepted:
27
03
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
13
4
2023
entrez:
12
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The cross-sectional shape of the aortic root is cloverleaf, not circular, raising controversy regarding how best to measure its radiographic "diameter" for aortic event prediction. We mathematically extended the law of Laplace to estimate aortic wall stress within this cloverleaf region, simultaneously identifying a new metric of aortic root dimension that can be applied to clinical measurement of the aortic root and sinuses of Valsalva on clinical computerized tomographic scans. Enforcing equilibrium between blood pressure and wall stress, finite element computations were performed to evaluate the mathematical derivation. The resulting Laplace diameter was compared with existing methods of aortic root measurement across four patient groups: non-syndromic aneurysm, bicuspid aortic valve, Marfan syndrome, and non-dilated root patients (total 106 patients, 62 M, 44 F). (1) Wall stress: Mean wall stress at the depth of the sinuses followed this equation: Wall stress = BP × Circumscribing circle diameter/(2 × Aortic wall thickness). Therefore, the diameter of the circle enclosing the root cloverleaf, that is, twice the distance between the center, where the sinus-to-commissure lines coincide, and the depth of the sinuses, may replace diameter in the Laplace relation for a cloverleaf cross-section (or any shaped cross-section with two or more planes of symmetry). This mathematically derived result was verified by computational finite element analyses. (2) Diameters: CT scan measurements showed a significant difference between this new metric, the Laplace diameter, and the sinus-to-commissure, mid-sinus-to-mid-sinus, and coronal measurements in all four groups (p-value < 0.05). The average Laplace diameter measurements differed significantly from the other measurements in all patient groups. Among the various possible measurements within the aortic root, the diameter of the circumscribing circle, enclosing the cloverleaf, represents the diameter most closely related to wall stress. This diameter is larger than the other measurements, indicating an underestimation of wall stress by prior measurements, and otherwise provides an unbiased, convenient, consistent, physics-based measurement for clinical use. "Diameter" applies to circles. Our mathematical derivation of an extension of the law of Laplace, from circular to cloverleaf cross-sectional geometries of the aortic root, has implications for measurement of aortic root "diameter." The suggested method is as follows: (1) the "center" of the aortic root is identified by drawing three sinus-to-commissure lines. The intersection of these three lines identifies the "center" of the cloverleaf. (2) The largest radius from this center point to any of the sinuses is identified as the "radius" of the aortic root. (3) This radius is doubled to give the "diameter" of the aortic root. We find that this diameter best corresponds to maximal wall stress in the aortic root. Please note that this diameter defines the smallest circle that completely encloses the cloverleaf shape, touching the depths of all three sinuses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37046157
doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02847-5
pii: 10.1007/s10554-023-02847-5
pmc: PMC10250276
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1345-1356Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Circulation. 2007 Sep 4;116(10):1120-7
pubmed: 17709637
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2008 May;33(5):203-77
pubmed: 18439439
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;34(6):1115-1123
pubmed: 34718581
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jan;134:109424
pubmed: 33259990
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Jun;21(6):945-52
pubmed: 7776474
Science. 2014 May 2;344(6183):477-9
pubmed: 24786066
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 20;12:732561
pubmed: 34744774
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):19-26
pubmed: 24183250
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jun;32(6):792-794
pubmed: 30926407
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Apr;75(4):1210-4
pubmed: 12683565
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2013 Apr;6(2):87-94
pubmed: 23723616
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):201-217
pubmed: 32646571
Aorta (Stamford). 2021 Feb;9(1):1-8
pubmed: 34607379
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e022102
pubmed: 34743563
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:283-302
pubmed: 18544034
J Biomech. 2013 Jun 21;46(10):1729-38
pubmed: 23664314
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jul-Aug;56(1):74-80
pubmed: 23993240
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):169-77
pubmed: 16368358
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6396-6404
pubmed: 31278573
Echocardiography. 2017 Mar;34(3):453-461
pubmed: 28160343
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011 Jan-Feb;20(1):15-25
pubmed: 19926309
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):939-948
pubmed: 30809640
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1384-9
pubmed: 21867987
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1452-1459
pubmed: 32178922