Extravascular Ultrasound (EVUS) to Assess the Results of Peripheral Endovascular Procedures.
EVUS
PAD
angiography
duplex ultrasound
lithotripsy
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Apr 2023
06 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
15
02
2023
revised:
28
03
2023
accepted:
03
04
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Contrast arteriography (CA) is considered the gold standard to evaluate any phase in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) interventions, from diagnostics to final results. Nevertheless, duplex ultrasonography (DUS) mostly used for the pre/postoperative phase and follow-up control, could be a potential intraoperative adjunctive imaging tool to assess the effects of endovascular revascularization in patients with iliac and femoropopliteal lesions. The PAD "duplex-assisted" protocol includes a preoperative DUS control followed by an intraoperative and a postoperative control. The most important parameters are pulsed doppler spectral analysis and waveform changes, which are impossible to detect with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). By using a similar acronym, the intraoperative DUS has been previously described as extravascular ultrasound (EVUS). B-mode imaging, color flow, and peak systolic velocity (PSV) are considered. EVUS could be very useful to evaluate the effects of endovascular treatment, mainly in cases of unclear CAs, severe calcifications and/or dissections. In the context of the "leaving nothing behind" strategy, EVUS can drive the physician to evaluate the absence of flow-limiting dissections and decide which target lesion should be treated with antirestenotic therapy, further vessel preparation, or stenting. The EVUS protocol could be a safe and feasible option to improve the completion assessment of endovascular PAD treatment. A better ultrasound waveform is a sign of improved luminal gain and compliance, which is extremely important to finalize the results of new peripheral device technology, such as intravascular lithotripsy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37046574
pii: diagnostics13071356
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071356
pmc: PMC10093749
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1294
pubmed: 24355119
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct;12(3):300-3
pubmed: 8896472
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):706-713
pubmed: 32716677
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67
pubmed: 17223489
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;24(3):367-375
pubmed: 28351208
J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;17(5):849-56; discussion 857
pubmed: 8487353
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1151-1158
pubmed: 29242063
J Vasc Surg. 1989 Nov;10(5):522-8; discussion 528-9
pubmed: 2681841
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Sep;26(3):517-38
pubmed: 9308598
Vasc Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):484-506
pubmed: 32667274
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2013 Dec;6(2):42-6
pubmed: 24358416
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Nov;155(5):1085-9
pubmed: 2120939
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;21(1):44-51
pubmed: 24502483
Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Jun;4(3):384-8
pubmed: 8782943