Outcomes of Isolated Biceps Tenodesis/Tenotomy or Partial Rotator Cuff Repair Associated with Biceps Tenodesis/Tenotomy for Massive Irreparable Tears: A Systematic Review.
irreparable massive rotator cuff tear
isolated biceps tenotomy/tenodesis
partial cuff repair
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2023
29 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
20
02
2023
revised:
14
03
2023
accepted:
26
03
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Irreparable large to massive rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) are a prevalent cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction, and nonoperative treatment may not always be effective. Various surgical options exist, with isolated biceps tenotomy/tenodesis (BT) or arthroscopic partial repair with associated biceps tenotomy/tenodesis (PCR-BT) being the most common. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available data on the clinical and functional outcomes of BT and PCR-BT in patients with MIRCTs. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies on the treatment of MIRCT. We included studies with BT or PCR-BT with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score was used to assess study quality. Outcomes included were the visual analog scale for pain, functional scores such as Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, range of motion, radiological measurements, and complications. A total of 1101 patients (506 had a BT and 595 had a PCR-BT) from 22 studies were included (cases series = 13, case-control = 7, randomized control trial = 1, prospective cohort study = 1). The mean MINORS score was 13.2 ± 3.2. The mean age and follow-up were 67 ± 6.8 years and 4.58 ± 1.1 years (range, 2, 12), respectively. The VAS improvement showed at the last follow-up for PCR-BT (range, 1.97, 5.8) and BT (range, 4, 6.1). CMS was improved at the final follow-up for PCR-BT (range, 13, 47.6) and BT (range, 10.8, 28). Regarding the ASES, it has demonstrated significant improvements for PCR-BT (range, 31.81, 44.8) and BT (range, 30,45.8). For forward flexion, PCR-BT showed improvement (range, -14°, 59.4°), as well as the BT group (range, 2°, 27.9°). This systematic review demonstrated that both BT and PCR-BT improve functional outcomes and reduce pain at midterm follow-up for MIRCT. Since we know that a failed cuff repair would worsen the shoulder, it might be beneficial in terms of the risk-benefit ratio to not repair in certain patients with MIRCT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37048656
pii: jcm12072565
doi: 10.3390/jcm12072565
pmc: PMC10095538
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):30-9
pubmed: 19111216
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1431-1444
pubmed: 33276163
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Dec;22(12):1650-5
pubmed: 23850308
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1545-1552
pubmed: 29980338
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1965-75
pubmed: 26015444
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov 07;6(11):2325967118805385
pubmed: 30480007
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1195-202
pubmed: 24433628
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 May-Jun;14(3):238-46
pubmed: 15889020
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):183-90
pubmed: 26564791
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 18;88(4S):69-74
pubmed: 29083356
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):491-500
pubmed: 24753240
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906
pubmed: 33789826
Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar;27(3):330-8
pubmed: 21144695
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1755-1761
pubmed: 28319431
Arthroscopy. 1994 Aug;10(4):363-70
pubmed: 7945631
Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):1949-1955
pubmed: 28866339
Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1639-1644
pubmed: 28602388
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov;25(11):1803-1809
pubmed: 27282734
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):494-501
pubmed: 23212188
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3828-3837
pubmed: 26254089
Arthroscopy. 2017 Feb;33(2):261-268
pubmed: 27614389
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):181-191
pubmed: 32108260
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):45
pubmed: 33676417
Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2091-2093
pubmed: 32747057
Arthroscopy. 2021 Oct;37(10):3039-3048
pubmed: 33940124
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2555-2562
pubmed: 28787191
Instr Course Lect. 2014;63:71-83
pubmed: 24720295
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jun;28(6):761-8
pubmed: 22317798
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1969-1977
pubmed: 29980340
Am J Sports Med. 2007 May;35(5):719-28
pubmed: 17337727
Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2080-2088
pubmed: 32339635
J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Mar;11(1):13-20
pubmed: 20198404
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 May;154(5):667-72
pubmed: 7071702
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):747-57
pubmed: 17403796
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):965-71
pubmed: 23780533
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):90-6
pubmed: 15805942
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Oct;20(7):1170-7
pubmed: 21277807
Orthop Res Rev. 2018 Dec 05;10:93-103
pubmed: 30774464
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1393-1401
pubmed: 32920107
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1001-9
pubmed: 17785735
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0241277
pubmed: 33180802
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):743-8
pubmed: 18589261
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1911-21
pubmed: 24169146
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Apr;108(2):102894
pubmed: 33746073
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep;12(3):353-363
pubmed: 32904088
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):505-15
pubmed: 10761941
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Nov;30(11):e659-e675
pubmed: 33930558
Arthroscopy. 2007 Apr;23(4):347-54
pubmed: 17418325
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2164-2173
pubmed: 27056691
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):282-289
pubmed: 32603897
Acta Chir Belg. 2005 May-Jun;105(3):297-301
pubmed: 16018524
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Sep 4;101(17):1603-1612
pubmed: 31483405