Comparison of Lactate Clearance with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Predicting Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
emergency medicine
endoscopy
gastrointestinal bleeding
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Apr 2023
05 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
12
03
2023
revised:
03
04
2023
accepted:
04
04
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early risk stratification is mandatory in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) to guide optimal treatment. Numerous risk scores were introduced, but lack of practicability led to limited use in daily clinical practice. Lactate clearance is an established risk assessment tool in a variety of diseases, such as trauma and sepsis. Therefore, this study compares the predictive ability of pre-endoscopic lactate clearance and established risk scores in patients with AUGIB at the University Hospital of Cologne. Active bleeding was detected in 27 (25.2%) patients, and hemostatic intervention was performed in 35 (32.7%). In total, 16 patients (15%) experienced rebleeding and 12 (11.2%) died. Initially, lactate levels were elevated in 64 cases (59.8%), and the median lactate clearance was 18.7% (2.7-48.2%). Regarding the need for endoscopic intervention, the predictive ability of Glasgow Blatchford Score, pre-endoscopic Rockall score, initial lactate and lactate clearance did not differ significantly, and their area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.658 (0.560-0.747), 0.572 (0.473-0.667), 0.572 (0.473-0.667) and 0.583 (0.483-0.677), respectively. Similar results were observed in relation to rebleeding and mortality. In conclusion, lactate clearance had comparable predictive ability compared to established risk scores. Further prospective research is necessary to clarify the potential role of lactate clearance as a reliable risk assessment tool in AUGIB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37048800
pii: jcm12072716
doi: 10.3390/jcm12072716
pmc: PMC10095270
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Crit Care. 1999 Mar;14(1):7-11
pubmed: 10102718
Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21
pubmed: 8675081
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 28;2(4):197-202
pubmed: 27752598
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):1042-1050
pubmed: 36376577
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 02;8(1):
pubmed: 30609708
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;10(10):1130-1135.e1
pubmed: 22801061
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):82-89
pubmed: 31359521
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Oct 13;:
pubmed: 36229587
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917
pubmed: 33929377
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247
pubmed: 34599691
Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):42-7
pubmed: 19091393
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):e93-8
pubmed: 24518802
Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1327-35
pubmed: 21490373
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;11(5):737-43
pubmed: 26837207
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1021-6
pubmed: 9563714
J Trauma. 2002 Mar;52(3):415-9
pubmed: 11901313
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):
pubmed: 36769733
Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1318-21
pubmed: 11073021
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):300-332
pubmed: 33567467
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jul;141(1):62-70
pubmed: 21447331
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1299-1308
pubmed: 32242355
Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1544-1550
pubmed: 34548338
J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):318-25
pubmed: 26113379
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432
pubmed: 28053181
Gut. 2021 Apr;70(4):707-716
pubmed: 32723845
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):e489-e495
pubmed: 29432347
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):115-21.e2
pubmed: 25058843
J Surg Res. 2001 Aug;99(2):235-44
pubmed: 11469892
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;53(5):586-591
pubmed: 29103333
Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2118-25
pubmed: 24797375
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):555-66
pubmed: 27280943