Tertiary Syphilitic Gumma Mimicking Testicular Neoplasms.

bilateral testicular masses germ-cell tumor gumma orchidectomy tertiary syphilis testis-sparing management treponema pallidum

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
accepted: 09 04 2023
medline: 14 4 2023
entrez: 13 4 2023
pubmed: 14 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Palpable testicular masses in men aged 20 to 50 years usually represent testicular germ cell tumors. Diagnostic work-up involves ultrasound examination as well as serum tumor markers alpha fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase, and particularly the novel marker M371. Orchidectomy is mandatory for germ cell tumors. We report the rare case of testicular involvement by tertiary syphilis mimicking testicular neoplasms with testis-sparing management. A 46-year-old Caucasian male presented with a painless firm mass in the right testicle and multiple cutaneous plaques at the skin of the scrotum, penis and right forearm. Testicular serum tumor markers were negative. Syphilis Rapid Plasma Reagin test and Treponema pallidum immunoglobulin antibodies tests were positive. Radiological examination revealed bilateral testicular lesions as well as bipulmonal pleural-based opacities. Conservative management was attempted and treatment with ceftriaxone (2 g/day) intravenously for 14 days was administered. The testicular findings improved rapidly and significantly during antibiotic treatment. Radiological follow-up examinations after two weeks and two months showed further regression of the testicular and pulmonary lesions. This case represents an extremely rare testicular manifestation of tertiary syphilis. Due to rising syphilis incidence in Europe, tertiary syphilis with formation of gumma should be a differential diagnosis of testicular tumor. Thus, syphilis-specific treatment is safe and orchidectomy can be avoided.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37051441
doi: 10.7759/cureus.37392
pmc: PMC10085538
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e37392

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Angerer et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Sep;22(9):531-3
pubmed: 21890556
J Urol. 1947 Mar;57(3):564-6
pubmed: 20286173
Urol Int. 1987;42(4):241-7
pubmed: 3314057
Br J Urol. 1977 Apr;49(2):142
pubmed: 858033
Int J STD AIDS. 2010 Jul;21(7):526-7
pubmed: 20852208
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Mar;35(3):574-588
pubmed: 33094521
BMC Urol. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):120
pubmed: 34479520
Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Aug;24(8):671-3
pubmed: 23970589
Br J Vener Dis. 1977 Aug;53(4):257-9
pubmed: 922459
Br J Vener Dis. 1957 Dec;33(4):258
pubmed: 13499893
South Med J. 1980 Jul;73(7):954-5
pubmed: 7384865
Urol Int. 2021;105(3-4):169-180
pubmed: 33412555
Trop Doct. 2019 Jan;49(1):45-47
pubmed: 30394857
Diagn Pathol. 2016 Jan 14;11:4
pubmed: 26762155
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 8;325(6):414-22
pubmed: 2062333

Auteurs

Markus Angerer (M)

Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, DEU.

Felix Lübbersmeyer (F)

Department of Urology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, DEU.

Raphael Gübitz (R)

Department of Radiology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, DEU.

Christian Wülfing (C)

Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, DEU.

Klaus-Peter Dieckmann (KP)

Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, DEU.

Classifications MeSH