Non-invasive Angiographic-based Fractional Flow Reserve: Technical Development, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives.
coronary artery disease
diagnostic accuracy
fractional flow reserve
physiology guided percutaneous coronary intervention
quantitative flow ratio
Journal
Current medical science
ISSN: 2523-899X
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Sci
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101729993
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
21
06
2021
accepted:
30
05
2022
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
New non- and less-invasive techniques have been developed to overcome the procedural and operator related burden of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) for the assessment of potentially significant stenosis in the coronary arteries. Virtual FFR-techniques can obviate the need for the additional flow or pressure wires as used for FFR measurements. This review provides an overview of the developments and validation of the virtual FFR-algorithms, states the challenges, discusses the upcoming clinical trials, and postulates the future role of virtual FFR in the clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37055655
doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2751-4
pii: 10.1007/s11596-023-2751-4
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
423-433Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: Fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J, 2014,35(40):2831–2838
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094
pubmed: 24644308
Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Tonino PAL, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-Year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010,56(3):177–184
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
pubmed: 20537493
Dattilo PB, Prasad A, Honeycutt E, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Use Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012,60(22):2337–2339
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.990
pubmed: 23194945
Parikh RV, Liu G, Plomondon ME, et al. Utilization and Outcomes of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020,75(4):409–419
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.060
pubmed: 32000953
Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Pecoraro A, et al. Fractional flow reserve implementation in daily clinical practice: A European survey. Int J Cardiol, 2016,207:206–207
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.097
pubmed: 26803245
Hannawi B, Lam WW, Wang S, et al. Current use of fractional flow reserve: A nationwide survey. Tex Heart Inst J, 2014,41(6):579–584
doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3917
pubmed: 25593519
pmcid: 4251326
Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013,61(22):2233–2241
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083
pubmed: 23562923
Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017,70(25):3077–3087
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035
pubmed: 29101020
Masdjedi K, Zandvoort L van, Balbi MM, et al. Validation of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography based software to calculate Fractional Flow Reserve: Fast Assessment of Stenosis severity (FAST)-study. EuroIntervention, 2020,16(7):591–599
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00466
pubmed: 31085504
Tu S, Westra J, Adjedj J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in clinical practice: From wire-based invasive measurement to image-based computation. Eur Heart J, 2020,41(34):3271–3279
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz918
pubmed: 31886479
Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: Modeling the significance of coronary lesions. Results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013,6(2):149–157
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.024
pubmed: 23428006
Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, et al. Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: Comparison with pressure wire — fractional flow reserve. Eurointervention, 2014,10(5):574–583
doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M07_01
pubmed: 24988003
Tu S, Barbato E, Köszegi Z, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Calculation From 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography and TIMI Frame Count. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2014,7(7):768–777
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.004
pubmed: 25060020
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016,9(19):2024–2035
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013
pubmed: 27712739
Yazaki K, Otsuka M, Kataoka S, et al. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Circ J, 2017,81(7):988–992
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261
pubmed: 28331135
KoŁtowski Ł, Zaleska M, Maksym J, et al. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study. Clin Res Cardiol, 2018,107(9):858–867
doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1258-7
pubmed: 30128817
Tar B, Jenei C, Dezsi CA, et al. Less invasive fractional flow reserve measurement from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and classic fluid dynamic equations. EuroIntervention, 2018,14(8):942–950
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00859
pubmed: 29488883
Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, et al. Validation study of image-based fractional flow reserve during coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2017,10(9):e005259
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259
pubmed: 28916602
Tröbs M, Achenbach S, Röther J, et al. Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Using Coronary Angiographic Vessel Morphology Versus Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol, 2016,117(1):29–35
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.008
pubmed: 26596195
Seike F, Uetani T, Nishimura K, et al. Correlation Between Quantitative Angiography-Derived Trans-lesional Pressure and Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol, 2016,118(8):1158–1163
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.026
pubmed: 27553099
Huang FY, Liu Q, Liu XX, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve and virtual coronary stent guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiol J, 2020,27(3):318–319
doi: 10.5603/CJ.2020.0082
pubmed: 32583404
pmcid: 8015988
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2020,41(3):407–477
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
pubmed: 31504439
Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional flow reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018,7(14):e009603
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603
pubmed: 29980523
pmcid: 6064860
Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio during Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018,11(3):e007107
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107
pubmed: 29555835
pmcid: 5895131
Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, et al. Quantitative flow ratio and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the assessment of the functional severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Coron Artery Dis, 2018,29(8):611–617
doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000650
pubmed: 29965837
Smit JM, Koning G, Van Rosendael AR, et al. Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019,20(11):1231–1238
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey187
pubmed: 30535361
Ties D, van Dijk R, Pundziute G, et al. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol, 2018,271:36–41
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.002
pubmed: 30131233
van Rosendael AR, Koning G, Dimitriu-Leen AC, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017,33(9):1305–1312
doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1190-3
pubmed: 28642995
pmcid: 5539270
Westra J, Sejr-Hansen M, Koltowski L, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: The QREP study. EuroIntervention, 2022,17(15):1252–1259
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00425
pubmed: 34219667
pmcid: 9724855
Chang Y, Chen L, Westra J, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study. Cardiol J, 2020,27(3):230–237
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0105
pubmed: 30234896
pmcid: 8015972
Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, et al. Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve. Int J Angiol, 2016,25(4):229–234
Xu B, Tu L, Song L, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet, 2021,398(10317):2149–2159
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0
pubmed: 34742368
Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J, 2018,82(3):807–814
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949
pubmed: 29343675
Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, et al. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Mu-ltivessel Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2018,11(2):1–10
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006023
Sejr-Hansen M, Høj Christiansen E, Ahmad Y, et al. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2022,99(1):68–73
doi: 10.1002/ccd.29518
pubmed: 33533535
Mejía-Rentería H, Lee JM, Lauri F, et al. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018,11(8):741–753
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.014
pubmed: 29673505
Smit JM, El Mahdiui M, van Rosendael AR, et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Cardiol, 2019,123(10):1722–1728
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.035
pubmed: 30853082
Takashima H, Waseda K, Gosho M, et al. Severity of morphological lesion complexity affects fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis. J Cardiol, 2015,66(3):239–245
doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.11.004
pubmed: 25547739
Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, et al. Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography: Modeling the Significance of Coronary Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013,6(2):149–157
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.024
pubmed: 23428006