Sildenafil Citrate and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Biochemical Recurrence
Prostate
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sildenafil Citrate
Journal
The journal of sexual medicine
ISSN: 1743-6109
Titre abrégé: J Sex Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101230693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
22
02
2021
accepted:
10
06
2021
medline:
1
8
2021
entrez:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
1
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be protective of sexual function when given concurrently and following prostate radiation therapy (RT), but some evidence suggests an increased biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk in patients taking sildenafil after radical prostatectomy. To evaluate whether sildenafil use is associated with increased risk of BCR in patients receiving prostate RT, we performed a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial (RPCT) that compared sildenafil citrate to placebo during and after prostate RT. The study population consisted of prostate cancer patients who initiated radiation treatment at our institution and participated in our multi-institutional RPCT that compared 6 months of sildenafil 50 mg once a day to placebo with a 24-month follow-up. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was allowed. Prostate cancer prognostic risk grouping was not an exclusion criterion, but most study participants had low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing. The primary outcomes of this report were biochemical recurrence and overall survival rates, where BCR was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Data of 162 men were analyzed. Nine men had inadequate PSA follow-up and the remaining 153 men were included in the final report. Median age was 61 years. At a median follow-up of 8.3 years (range: 3.0-12.2), 5/94 (5.3%) and 2/59 (3.4%) patients developed BCR in the sildenafil and placebo groups, respectively. The 6-year BCR-free survival was 98.8% for all patients, 98.1% for the sildenafil cohort, and 100% for the placebo cohort. The 10-year BCR-free survival was 94.4% for all patients, 95.6% for the sildenafil cohort, and 92.9% for the placebo cohort. There was no difference in BCR-free survival between the sildenafil and placebo groups by log-rank comparison (p = 0.36). This analysis informs clinical decision making about the safety of using sildenafil during and after prostate RT. This study included patients who were treated in the setting of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial, and who attained high medication compliance. However, the study was limited by the post-hoc nature of the analysis, use of ADT in some patients, inadequate study power to detect a difference in BCR between sildenafil and placebo groups. Prophylactic sildenafil citrate was not associated with biochemical recurrence risk in prostate cancer patients treated with radiation. However, the study was inadequately powered to definitively conclude a negative finding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be protective of sexual function when given concurrently and following prostate radiation therapy (RT), but some evidence suggests an increased biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk in patients taking sildenafil after radical prostatectomy.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether sildenafil use is associated with increased risk of BCR in patients receiving prostate RT, we performed a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial (RPCT) that compared sildenafil citrate to placebo during and after prostate RT.
METHODS
METHODS
The study population consisted of prostate cancer patients who initiated radiation treatment at our institution and participated in our multi-institutional RPCT that compared 6 months of sildenafil 50 mg once a day to placebo with a 24-month follow-up. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was allowed. Prostate cancer prognostic risk grouping was not an exclusion criterion, but most study participants had low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing.
OUTCOMES
RESULTS
The primary outcomes of this report were biochemical recurrence and overall survival rates, where BCR was defined according to the Phoenix definition.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data of 162 men were analyzed. Nine men had inadequate PSA follow-up and the remaining 153 men were included in the final report. Median age was 61 years. At a median follow-up of 8.3 years (range: 3.0-12.2), 5/94 (5.3%) and 2/59 (3.4%) patients developed BCR in the sildenafil and placebo groups, respectively. The 6-year BCR-free survival was 98.8% for all patients, 98.1% for the sildenafil cohort, and 100% for the placebo cohort. The 10-year BCR-free survival was 94.4% for all patients, 95.6% for the sildenafil cohort, and 92.9% for the placebo cohort. There was no difference in BCR-free survival between the sildenafil and placebo groups by log-rank comparison (p = 0.36).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis informs clinical decision making about the safety of using sildenafil during and after prostate RT.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS
UNASSIGNED
This study included patients who were treated in the setting of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial, and who attained high medication compliance. However, the study was limited by the post-hoc nature of the analysis, use of ADT in some patients, inadequate study power to detect a difference in BCR between sildenafil and placebo groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Prophylactic sildenafil citrate was not associated with biochemical recurrence risk in prostate cancer patients treated with radiation. However, the study was inadequately powered to definitively conclude a negative finding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37057447
pii: 6956043
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.002
pmc: PMC8384054
mid: NIHMS1725056
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1467-1472Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021, International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1760-7
pubmed: 26717939
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):824-828
pubmed: 26743040
Cancer. 1999 Jun 1;85(11):2460-8
pubmed: 10357419
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74
pubmed: 16798415
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437
pubmed: 27626365
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):479-83
pubmed: 25196656
Andrologia. 2019 Mar;51(2):e13198
pubmed: 30443968
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):330-7
pubmed: 18164858
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):750-3
pubmed: 25700565
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):868-74
pubmed: 24603102
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1300-7
pubmed: 24691606
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 04;4(3):492-499
pubmed: 31360805