Academic journals cannot simply require authors to declare that they used ChatGPT.
Academic journals
Research ethics
Research integrity
Research originality
Scholarly publishing
Journal
Irish journal of medical science
ISSN: 1863-4362
Titre abrégé: Ir J Med Sci
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7806864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
06
04
2023
accepted:
11
04
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
15
4
2023
entrez:
14
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This letter to the editor points out weaknesses in the editorial policies of some academic journals regarding the use of ChatGPT-generated content. Editorial policies should provide more specific details on which parts of an academic paper are allowed to use ChatGPT-generated content. If authors use ChatGPT-generated content in the conclusion or results section, it may harm the academic paper's originality and, therefore, should not be accepted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37058235
doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03374-x
pii: 10.1007/s11845-023-03374-x
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3195-3196Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.
Références
Tang G, Cai H, Jia J (2022) Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods. Account Res 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2117621
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971) (2023) The submission guidelines of Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971). In: Springer. https://www.springer.com/journal/11845/submission - guidelines#Instructions%20for%20Authors_References. Accessed 8 Apr 2023
Nature (2023) Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature 613:612–612. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Hosseini M, Rasmussen LM, Resnik DB (2023) Using AI to write scholarly publications. Account Res 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Fuster V, Bozkurt B, Chandrashekhar YS et al (2023) JACC Journals’ pathway forward with AI tools. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.001
Tang G (2023) Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers. Account Res 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2180359
Shibayama S, Wang J (2019) Measuring originality in science. Scientometrics 122:409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03263-0
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03263-0
Stokel-Walker C (2023) ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 613:620–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
pubmed: 36653617
Kingsley D, Conversation T (2023) Major publishers are banning ChatGPT from being listed as an academic author. What’s the big deal? In: phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2023-01-major-publishers-chatgpt-academic-author.html . Accessed 8 Apr 2023