Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology centers: Italian survey.
Journal
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 2724-6450
Titre abrégé: Minerva Obstet Gynecol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777346
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Apr 2023
14 Apr 2023
Historique:
entrez:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
15
4
2023
medline:
15
4
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In assisted reproductive cycles (ART), the fine balance of controlling corpus luteum function is severely disrupted. To challenge this iatrogenic deficiency, clinicians aim to provide exogenous support. Several reviews have investigated progesterone route of administration, dosage and timing. A survey about luteal phase support (LPS) after ovarian stimulation was conducted among doctors in charge in Italian II-III level ART centers. With regards to the general approach to LPS, 87.9% doctors declare to diversify the approach; the reasons for diversifying (69.7%) were based on the type of cycle. For all the most important administration routes (vaginal, intramuscular, subcutaneous) it appears that in frozen cycles there is a shift towards higher dosages. The 90.9% of the centers use vaginal progesterone, and when a combined approach is required, in 72.7% of cases vaginal administration is combined with injective route of administration. When Italian doctors were asked about the beginning and duration of LPS, 96% of the centers start the day of the pickup or the day after, while 80% of the centers continue LPS until week 8-12. The rate of participation of the centers confirms the low perceived importance of LPS among Italian ART centers, while may be considered quite surprising the relatively higher percentage of centers that measures P level. Tailorization to women's needs is the new objective of LPS: self-administration, good tolerability are the main aspects for Italian centers. In conclusion, results of Italian survey are consistent to results of main international surveys about LPS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In assisted reproductive cycles (ART), the fine balance of controlling corpus luteum function is severely disrupted. To challenge this iatrogenic deficiency, clinicians aim to provide exogenous support. Several reviews have investigated progesterone route of administration, dosage and timing.
METHODS
METHODS
A survey about luteal phase support (LPS) after ovarian stimulation was conducted among doctors in charge in Italian II-III level ART centers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
With regards to the general approach to LPS, 87.9% doctors declare to diversify the approach; the reasons for diversifying (69.7%) were based on the type of cycle. For all the most important administration routes (vaginal, intramuscular, subcutaneous) it appears that in frozen cycles there is a shift towards higher dosages. The 90.9% of the centers use vaginal progesterone, and when a combined approach is required, in 72.7% of cases vaginal administration is combined with injective route of administration. When Italian doctors were asked about the beginning and duration of LPS, 96% of the centers start the day of the pickup or the day after, while 80% of the centers continue LPS until week 8-12. The rate of participation of the centers confirms the low perceived importance of LPS among Italian ART centers, while may be considered quite surprising the relatively higher percentage of centers that measures P level. Tailorization to women's needs is the new objective of LPS: self-administration, good tolerability are the main aspects for Italian centers.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, results of Italian survey are consistent to results of main international surveys about LPS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37058319
pii: S2724-606X.22.05219-8
doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05219-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM