Risk factors for EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation adverse events in patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a large national French study (RAFPAN study).


Journal

Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1097-6779
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0010505

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 05 01 2023
revised: 03 04 2023
accepted: 06 04 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 15 4 2023
entrez: 14 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been described as a potentially curative option for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pancreatic EUS-RFA in a large study population. A retrospective study retrieving all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic EUS-RFA during 2019 and 2020 in France was conducted. Indication, procedural characteristics, early and late adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes were recorded. Risk factors for AEs and factors related to complete tumor ablation were assessed on univariate and multivariate analyses. One hundred patients (54% men, 64.8 ± 17.6 years old) affected by 104 neoplasms were included. Sixty-four neoplasms were neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), 23 were metastases, and 10 were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mural nodules. No procedure-related mortality was observed, and 22 AEs were reported. Proximity of pancreatic neoplasms (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct was the only independent risk factor for AEs (odds ratio [OR), 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI), 1.02-15.22; P = .04). Fifty-nine patients (60.2%) achieved a complete tumor response, 31 (31.6%) a partial response, and 9 (9.2%) achieved no response. On multivariate analysis, NENs (OR, 7.95; 95% CI, 1.66-51.79; P < .001) and neoplasm size <20 mm (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.17-14.29; P < .001) were independently related to complete tumor ablation. The results of this large study confirm an overall acceptable safety profile for pancreatic EUS-RFA. Close proximity (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct represents an independent risk factor for AEs. Good clinical outcomes in terms of tumor ablation were observed, especially for small NENs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been described as a potentially curative option for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pancreatic EUS-RFA in a large study population.
METHODS
A retrospective study retrieving all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic EUS-RFA during 2019 and 2020 in France was conducted. Indication, procedural characteristics, early and late adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes were recorded. Risk factors for AEs and factors related to complete tumor ablation were assessed on univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS
One hundred patients (54% men, 64.8 ± 17.6 years old) affected by 104 neoplasms were included. Sixty-four neoplasms were neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), 23 were metastases, and 10 were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mural nodules. No procedure-related mortality was observed, and 22 AEs were reported. Proximity of pancreatic neoplasms (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct was the only independent risk factor for AEs (odds ratio [OR), 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI), 1.02-15.22; P = .04). Fifty-nine patients (60.2%) achieved a complete tumor response, 31 (31.6%) a partial response, and 9 (9.2%) achieved no response. On multivariate analysis, NENs (OR, 7.95; 95% CI, 1.66-51.79; P < .001) and neoplasm size <20 mm (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.17-14.29; P < .001) were independently related to complete tumor ablation.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this large study confirm an overall acceptable safety profile for pancreatic EUS-RFA. Close proximity (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct represents an independent risk factor for AEs. Good clinical outcomes in terms of tumor ablation were observed, especially for small NENs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37059368
pii: S0016-5107(23)00376-0
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

392-399.e1

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Bertrand Napoléon (B)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France.

Andrea Lisotti (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France.

Fabrice Caillol (F)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.

Mohamed Gasmi (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.

Philippe Ah-Soune (P)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Sainte-Musse Hospital, Toulon, France.

Arthur Belle (A)

Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Antoine Charachon (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Princesse Grace Hospital, Monaco.

Franck Cholet (F)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, Brest, France.

Pierre-Yves Eyraud (PY)

Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Philippe Grandval (P)

Gastroenterology Department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.

Jean-Michel Gonzalez (JM)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.

Francois Habersetzer (F)

Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

Stéphane Koch (S)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besançon, France.

Marc Le Rhun (M)

Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Luigi Mangialavori (L)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé A Brillard, Ramsay Sante, Nogent sur Marne, France.

Nicolas Musquer (N)

Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Maxime Palazzo (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy-la-Garenne, France.

Laurent Poincloux (L)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Jocelyn Privat (J)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Vichy Hospital, Vichy, France.

Adrien Sportes (A)

Digestive Endoscopy, Institut Arnault Tzanck Gastroenterology Unit, Saint-Laurent-du-Var, France.

Morgane Stouvenot (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besançon, France.

Clement Subtil (C)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Lucie Thomassin (L)

Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, University of Rouen, France.

Geoffroy Vanbiervliet (G)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Archet University Hospital, Nice, France.

Guillaume Vidal (G)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Lucine Vuitton (L)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besançon, France.

Marc Giovannini (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.

Marc Barthet (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH