Prostatectomy Bed Image-guided Dose-escalated Salvage Radiotherapy (SPIDER): An International Multicenter Retrospective Study.


Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 07 09 2022
revised: 13 02 2023
accepted: 22 02 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 15 4 2023
entrez: 14 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Management of macroscopic local recurrence (MLR) after radical prostatectomy is a challenging situation with no standardized approach. The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of functional image-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with MLR in the prostate bed. In this international multicenter retrospective study across 16 European centers, eligible patients were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection for localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured 4 wk after RP was <0.1 ng/ml. All patients presented a biochemical relapse after RP defined by an increase in PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/ml on two successive measures. Only patients with an MLR lesion in the prostatectomy bed visualized on functional imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography [PET/CT] choline, or PET/CT prostate-specific membrane antigen) were eligible. Patients with lymph node, bone, or visceral dissemination at restaging imaging (CT and/or bone scintigraphy and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or PET) were excluded. Dose escalation was defined as a dose of >66 Gy prescribed to the prostate bed or to MLR. Toxicities were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale, version 4.03. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MPFS), biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were analyzed. Between January 2000 and December 2019, 310 patients received at least one dose escalation on MLR and 25 patients did not receive any dose escalation. The median PSA level before SRT was 0.63 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 0.27-1.7). The median follow-up was 54 mo (IQR, 50-56). Five-year PFS and MPFS were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [64; 75]) and 84% (95% CI: [78; 88]), respectively. Grade ≥2 GU and GI late toxicities were observed in 43 (12%) and 11 (3%) patients, respectively. When the prescribed dose on the MLR lesion was ≥72 Gy, an improvement in 5-yr PFS was found for patients received at least one dose escalation (73% [95% CI: 65-79]) vs 60% [95% CI: 48; 70]; p = 0.03). In this contemporary study integrating functional imaging data, we found potential efficacy of SRT with dose escalation ≥72 Gy for patients with MLR in the prostate bed and with an acceptable toxicity profile. Prospective data exploring this MLR dose escalation strategy are awaited. In this report, we looked at the outcomes from salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer and macroscopic relapse in a large European population. We found that outcomes varied with prostate-specific antigen at relapse, Gleason score, and dose escalation. We found potential efficacy of salvage radiotherapy with dose escalation for macroscopic relapse in the prostate bed, with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Management of macroscopic local recurrence (MLR) after radical prostatectomy is a challenging situation with no standardized approach.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of functional image-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with MLR in the prostate bed.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
In this international multicenter retrospective study across 16 European centers, eligible patients were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection for localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured 4 wk after RP was <0.1 ng/ml. All patients presented a biochemical relapse after RP defined by an increase in PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/ml on two successive measures. Only patients with an MLR lesion in the prostatectomy bed visualized on functional imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography [PET/CT] choline, or PET/CT prostate-specific membrane antigen) were eligible. Patients with lymph node, bone, or visceral dissemination at restaging imaging (CT and/or bone scintigraphy and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or PET) were excluded. Dose escalation was defined as a dose of >66 Gy prescribed to the prostate bed or to MLR. Toxicities were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale, version 4.03. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MPFS), biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were analyzed.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Between January 2000 and December 2019, 310 patients received at least one dose escalation on MLR and 25 patients did not receive any dose escalation. The median PSA level before SRT was 0.63 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 0.27-1.7). The median follow-up was 54 mo (IQR, 50-56). Five-year PFS and MPFS were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [64; 75]) and 84% (95% CI: [78; 88]), respectively. Grade ≥2 GU and GI late toxicities were observed in 43 (12%) and 11 (3%) patients, respectively. When the prescribed dose on the MLR lesion was ≥72 Gy, an improvement in 5-yr PFS was found for patients received at least one dose escalation (73% [95% CI: 65-79]) vs 60% [95% CI: 48; 70]; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
In this contemporary study integrating functional imaging data, we found potential efficacy of SRT with dose escalation ≥72 Gy for patients with MLR in the prostate bed and with an acceptable toxicity profile. Prospective data exploring this MLR dose escalation strategy are awaited.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this report, we looked at the outcomes from salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer and macroscopic relapse in a large European population. We found that outcomes varied with prostate-specific antigen at relapse, Gleason score, and dose escalation. We found potential efficacy of salvage radiotherapy with dose escalation for macroscopic relapse in the prostate bed, with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37059627
pii: S2588-9311(23)00067-6
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

390-398

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini (N)

Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France.

Thomas Zilli (T)

Department of Radiotherapy, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Antoine Giraud (A)

Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France.

Gianluca Ingrosso (G)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Mario Di Staso (M)

Department of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Fabio Trippa (F)

Department of Radiotherapy, Saint Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.

Pascal Pommier (P)

Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Emmanuel Meyer (E)

Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France.

Giulio Francolini (G)

Department of Radiotherapy of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Ulrike Schick (U)

Department of Radiotherapy, Morvan Hospital Brest, France.

David Pasquier (D)

Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille, France.

Jean Marc Cosset (J)

Amethyst Radiotherapy, La Garenne-Colombes, France.

Nicolas Magne (N)

Department of Radiotherapy, St Etienne University, St Etienne, France.

Etienne Martin (E)

Department of Radiotherapy, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France.

Kémara Gnep (K)

Department of Radiotherapy, Eugene Marquis Cancer Institute, Rennes, France.

Raphaelle Renard-Penna (R)

Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hopital Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France.

Ewen Anger (E)

Department of Radiotherapy, Eugene Marquis Cancer Institute, Rennes, France.

Vérane Achard (V)

Department of Radiotherapy, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Nicolas Giraud (N)

Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France.

Cynthia Aristei (C)

University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Victoria Ferrari (V)

Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Nice, France.

Corentin Pasquier (C)

Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Hind Zaine (H)

Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille, France.

Osman Osman (O)

Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Beatrice Detti (B)

Department of Radiotherapy of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Tanguy Perennec (T)

Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research Western France, St Herblain, France.

Inga Mihoci (I)

Department of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Stéphane Supiot (S)

Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research Western France, St Herblain, France.

Igor Latorzeff (I)

Department of Radiotherapy, Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France.

Paul Sargos (P)

Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: p.sargos@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH