Prediction of future curve angle using prior radiographs in previously untreated idiopathic scoliosis: natural history from age 6 to after the end of growth (SOSORT 2022 award winner).


Journal

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 27 09 2022
accepted: 22 03 2023
revised: 16 02 2023
medline: 5 6 2023
pubmed: 15 4 2023
entrez: 14 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Treatment selection for idiopathic scoliosis is informed by the risk of curve progression. Previous models predicting curve progression lacked validation, did not include the full growth/severity spectrum or included treated patients. The objective was to develop and validate models to predict future curve angles using clinical data collected only at, or both at and prior to, an initial specialist consultation in idiopathic scoliosis. This is an analysis of 2317 patients with idiopathic scoliosis between 6 and 25 years old. Patients were previously untreated and provided at least one prior radiograph prospectively collected at first consult. Radiographs were re-measured blinded to the predicted outcome: the maximum Cobb angle on the last radiograph while untreated. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the effect of data from the first available visit (age, sex, maximum Cobb angle, Risser, and curve type) and from other visits while untreated (maximum Cobb angle) and time (from the first available radiograph to prediction) on the Cobb angle outcome. Interactions of the first available angle with time, of time with sex, and time with Risser were also tested. We included 2317 patients (83% of females) with 3255 prior X-rays where 71% had 1, 21.1% had 2, and 7.5% had 3 or more. Mean age was 13.9 ± 2.2yrs and 81% had AIS. Curve types were: 50% double, 26% lumbar/thoracolumbar-lumbar, 16% thoracic, and 8% other. Cobb angle at the first available X-ray was 20 ± 10° (0-80) vs 29 ± 13° (6-122) at the outcome visit separated by 28 ± 22mths. In the model using data at and prior to the specialist consult, larger values of the following variables predicted larger future curves: first available Cobb angle, Cobb angle on other previous X-ray, and time (with Time The models can help clinicians predict how much curves would progress without treatment at future timepoints of their choice using simple variables. Predictions can inform treatment prescription or show families why no treatment is recommended. The nonlinear effects of time account for the rapid increase in curve angle at the beginning of growth and the slowed progression after maturity. These validated models predicted future Cobb angle with good accuracy in untreated idiopathic scoliosis over the full growth spectrum.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37059884
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07681-w
pii: 10.1007/s00586-023-07681-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2171-2184

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG et al (2018) 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8
doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8 pubmed: 30456307 pmcid: 6223093
Andersson GBJ, Bell J-E, Weinstein SL, et al (2010) The burden of musculoskeletal diseases additional contributing organizations project coordinator cover design, 2nd edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons., Rosemont, IL
Brooks HL, Azen SP, Gerberg E et al (1975) Scoliosis: a prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Jt SurgAm 57:968–972
doi: 10.2106/00004623-197557070-00015
Scoliosis Research Society (2015) E-Textbook by The Scoliosis Research Society on iBooks, Version 1.1. Scoliosis Research Society
Grivas TB, Vasiliadis E, Mouzakis V et al (2006) Association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis prevalence and age at menarche in different geographic latitudes. Scoliosis 1:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-9
doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-9 pubmed: 16759371 pmcid: 1501058
Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV (1983) Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 65:447–455
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198365040-00004
Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2003) Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study—part I. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2078–2086
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084268.77805.6F pubmed: 14501917
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF et al (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.5.559
doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.559 pubmed: 12851278
Khodaei M (2021) Development of a prediction model of curve progression in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. University of Alberta
Jose LT (2017) A narrative review of natural history of diseases and continuity of care in family medicine. Arch Community Med Publ Health 3:041–047. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000023
doi: 10.17352/2455-5479.000023
Hall JG (1988) The value of the study of natural history in genetic disorders and congenital anomaly syndromes. J Med Genet 25:434. https://doi.org/10.1136/JMG.25.7.434
doi: 10.1136/JMG.25.7.434 pubmed: 3050091 pmcid: 1050520
Bunnell WP (1988) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:20–25
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198804000-00003
Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. a prospective, controlled study based on data from the brace study of the scoliosis research society. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:815–822
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199506000-00001
Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Jt SurgAm 66:1061–1071
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198466070-00013
Peterson LE, Nachemson AL (1995) Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity. Logistic regression analysis based on data from the brace study of the scoliosis research society. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:823–827
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199506000-00002
Di Felice F, Zaina F, Donzelli S, Negrini S (2018) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis during growth: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabilit 97:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000861
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000861
Noshchenko A, Hoffecker L, Lindley EM et al (2015) Predictors of spine deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Orthop 6:537–558. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i7.537
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i7.537 pubmed: 26301183 pmcid: 4539477
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. New Engl J Med 369:1512–1521
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337 pubmed: 24047455
Romano M, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, et al (2012) Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews N.PAG--N.PAG
Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC et al (2018) Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence report and systematic review for the us preventive services task force. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 319:173–187. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11669
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669
Zhou Z, Liu F, Li R, Chen X (2021) The effects of exercise therapy on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CTIM.2021.102697
doi: 10.1016/J.CTIM.2021.102697 pubmed: 34118389
NegriniZainaRomano SFM et al (2008) Specific exercises reduce brace prescription in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective controlled cohort study with worst-case analysis. J Rehabil Med 40:451–455. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0195
doi: 10.2340/16501977-0195
MonticoneAmbrosiniCazzaniga MED et al (2014) Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 23:1204–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00586-014-3241-Y
doi: 10.1007/S00586-014-3241-Y
KuruYeldanDereli TİEE et al (2016) The efficacy of three-dimensional Schroth exercises in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabilit 30:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515575745
doi: 10.1177/0269215515575745
Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Ortho Surg Instr Lectures 5:261–275
Ponseti IV, Pedrini V, Wynne Davies R, Duval Beaupere G (1976) Pathogenesis of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:268–280. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197610000-00034
doi: 10.1097/00003086-197610000-00034
Duval-Beaupére G, Lamireau T (1985) Scoliosis at less than 30° properties of the evolutivity (risk of progression). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10:421–424. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198506000-00003
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198506000-00003 pubmed: 4049108
Bitan FD, Veliskakis KP, Campbell BC (2005) Differences in the risser grading systems in the United States and France. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BLO.0000160819.10767.88
doi: 10.1097/01.BLO.0000160819.10767.88
Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF (2006) Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000217774.13433.a7
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217774.13433.a7 pubmed: 16688038
Negrini S, Hresko TM, O’Brien JP, Price N (2015) Recommendations for research studies on treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: consensus 2014 between SOSORT and SRS non–operative management committee. Scoliosis 10:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-014-0025-4
doi: 10.1186/s13013-014-0025-4 pubmed: 25780381 pmcid: 4360938
Knott P, Pappo E, Cameron M et al (2014) SOSORT 2012 consensus paper: reducing x-ray exposure in pediatric patients with scoliosis. Scoliosis 9:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-9-4
doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-4 pubmed: 24782912 pmcid: 4002921
Lenz M, Oikonomidis S, Harland A et al (2021) Scoliosis and prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression. Eur Spine J 30:1813–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00586-021-06817-0
doi: 10.1007/S00586-021-06817-0 pubmed: 33772381
Lecoq C, Jacquemier M, Dutour O et al (2000) Sagittal equilibrium of the pelvis: analysis of the inclination of the ischio-pubic ramus from the horizontal. Revue de Chir Orthop et Répar de L’Appareil Mot 86:390–395
Noshchenko A (2015) Predictors of spine deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Orthop 6:537. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i7.537
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i7.537 pubmed: 26301183 pmcid: 4539477
Nault ML, Beauséjour M, Roy-Beaudry M et al (2020) A predictive model of progression for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on 3d spine parameters at first visit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:605–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003316
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003316 pubmed: 31703055
Schreiber S, Parent EC, Moez EK et al (2016) Schroth physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises added to the standard of care lead to better cobb angle outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis–an assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168746
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168746 pubmed: 28033399 pmcid: 5198985
Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ et al (2007) Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg–Am 89:64–73
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00067
Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S et al (2008) Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Jt Surg–Ser A 90:540–553. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00004
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00004
Minkara A, Bainton N, Tanaka M et al (2020) High risk of mismatch between sanders and risser staging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 40(2):60–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001135
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001135 pubmed: 31923164
Cheung PWH, Canavese F, Chan CYW et al (2022) The utility of a novel proximal femur maturity index for staging skeletal growth in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 104:630–640. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00747
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00747

Auteurs

Eric C Parent (EC)

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2G4, Canada. eparent@ualberta.ca.

Sabrina Donzelli (S)

ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy.

Maryna Yaskina (M)

Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Alberto Negrini (A)

ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy.

Giulia Rebagliati (G)

ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy.

Claudio Cordani (C)

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Fabio Zaina (F)

ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy.

Stefano Negrini (S)

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "la Statale", Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH