Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff.
Farm staff movements
Internal biosecurity
Pig production
Working lines
Journal
Porcine health management
ISSN: 2055-5660
Titre abrégé: Porcine Health Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684126
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Apr 2023
15 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
28
11
2022
accepted:
20
02
2023
medline:
15
4
2023
entrez:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
15
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37060028
doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4
pii: 10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4
pmc: PMC10105464
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):2297-308
pubmed: 16702297
Animal. 2016 Mar;10(3):478-89
pubmed: 26567800
Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 2003-2004;100:5-14
pubmed: 16429801
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Jan;186:105207
pubmed: 33261928
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1202-10
pubmed: 8791190
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):381-398
pubmed: 29124908
Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Jan 4;7(1):5
pubmed: 33397483
Vet J. 2013 Nov;198(2):508-12
pubmed: 24268483
Prev Vet Med. 2004 Dec 15;66(1-4):49-62
pubmed: 15579334
Anim Front. 2019 Apr 11;9(2):6-15
pubmed: 32002246
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 1;144:167-178
pubmed: 28716198
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Jul 1;129:74-87
pubmed: 27317325
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 Aug 1;57(4):225-36
pubmed: 20500492