Prospective evaluation of the tolerability and efficacy of niraparib dosing based on baseline body weight and platelet count: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial.

individualized starting dose niraparib ovarian cancer poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors/adverse effects poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors/therapeutic use

Journal

Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 06 2023
Historique:
revised: 12 08 2022
received: 27 06 2022
accepted: 17 08 2022
medline: 23 5 2023
pubmed: 16 4 2023
entrez: 15 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) trial was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen of niraparib for first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. In the phase 3 PRIMA trial, patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N = 733) were initially treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) regimen of 300 mg once daily. Subsequently, the protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD: 200 mg once daily in patients with baseline body weight < 77 kg or baseline platelet count < 150,000/µL, and 300 mg once daily in all other patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by starting dose. Overall, 475 (64.8%) patients were assigned to an FSD (niraparib, n = 317; placebo, n = 158) and 258 (35.2%) were assigned to an ISD (niraparib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88). Efficacy in patients who received FSD or ISD was similar for the overall (FSD hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46-0.76] vs. ISD HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.98]) and the homologous recombination-deficient (FSD HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64] vs. ISD HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.72]) populations. In patients with low body weight/platelet count, rates of grades ≥3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions were lower for those who received ISD than for those who received FSD. In PRIMA, similar dose intensity, similar efficacy, and improved safety were observed with the ISD compared with the FSD regimen.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) trial was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen of niraparib for first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
METHODS
In the phase 3 PRIMA trial, patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N = 733) were initially treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) regimen of 300 mg once daily. Subsequently, the protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD: 200 mg once daily in patients with baseline body weight < 77 kg or baseline platelet count < 150,000/µL, and 300 mg once daily in all other patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by starting dose.
RESULTS
Overall, 475 (64.8%) patients were assigned to an FSD (niraparib, n = 317; placebo, n = 158) and 258 (35.2%) were assigned to an ISD (niraparib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88). Efficacy in patients who received FSD or ISD was similar for the overall (FSD hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46-0.76] vs. ISD HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.98]) and the homologous recombination-deficient (FSD HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64] vs. ISD HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.72]) populations. In patients with low body weight/platelet count, rates of grades ≥3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions were lower for those who received ISD than for those who received FSD.
CONCLUSIONS
In PRIMA, similar dose intensity, similar efficacy, and improved safety were observed with the ISD compared with the FSD regimen.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37060236
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34706
doi:

Substances chimiques

Indazoles 0
niraparib HMC2H89N35
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors 0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1846-1855

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Références

US Food and Drug Administration. ZEJULA (niraparib). Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/208447s015s017lbledt.pdf
European Medicines Agency. ZEJULA (niraparib). Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/zejula-epar-product-information_en.pdf
Sandhu SK, Schelman WR, Wilding G, et al. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib (MK4827) in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with sporadic cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(9):882-892. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70240-7
Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(22):2154-2164. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611310
Berek JS, Matulonis UA, Peen U, et al. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1784-1792. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy181
González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. Niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2391-2402. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910962
Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2495-2505.
Wu XH, Zhu JQ, Yin RT, et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer using an individualized starting dose (NORA): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(4):512-521. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.018
Li N, Zhu J, Yin R, et al. Efficacy and safety of niraparib as maintenance treatment in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (PRIME Study): a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, phase 3 trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;(Suppl1):S50-S51.

Auteurs

Mansoor R Mirza (MR)

NSGO and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Antonio González-Martín (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain.

Whitney S Graybill (WS)

GOG and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

David M O'Malley (DM)

James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Lydia Gaba (L)

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.

Oi Wah Stephanie Yap (OW)

University Gynecologic Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Eva M Guerra (EM)

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Peter G Rose (PG)

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Jean-François Baurain (JF)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Sharad A Ghamande (SA)

Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

Hannelore Denys (H)

Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Emily Prendergast (E)

Minnesota Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Carmela Pisano (C)

Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.

Philippe Follana (P)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.

Klaus Baumann (K)

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie and the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Paula M Calvert (PM)

Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Jacob Korach (J)

Gynecologic Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Yong Li (Y)

GSK, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Izabela A Malinowska (IA)

GSK, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Divya Gupta (D)

GSK, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Bradley J Monk (BJ)

HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH