Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the treatment of oral factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding: a meta-analysis of fixed versus variable dosing.

anticoagulants anticoagulation reversal factor Xa inhibitors hemostasis prothrombin complex concentrates

Journal

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2475-0379
Titre abrégé: Res Pract Thromb Haemost
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101703775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 09 11 2022
revised: 17 02 2023
accepted: 23 02 2023
medline: 18 4 2023
entrez: 17 4 2023
pubmed: 18 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The optimal dosing strategy of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) to treat oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated bleeding has not been established. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fixed versus variable 4F-PCC dosing for the management of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis of clinical studies was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2022. The primary outcomes included hemostatic effectiveness, mortality, and thromboembolic events. Secondary outcomes included 4F-PCC usage, total length of stay in hospital and in intensive care units, and time to 4F-PCC administration. The pooled incidence or mean was calculated using a random-effects model and compared between the 2 dosing strategies. Twenty-five studies were included and data from 1,760 patients (fixed dosing, n = 228; variable dosing, n = 1,532) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in hemostatic effectiveness, thromboembolic events, or mortality rates between the dosing strategies. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the fixed-dosing group, with a mean stay of 7.4 days (95% CI: 3.6-11.1) compared to 5.9 days (95% CI: 5.5-6.3) in the variable-dosing group ( A fixed-dosing strategy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to variable weight-based dosing and was associated with lower 4F-PCC usage. However, direct comparative studies are needed to confirm these results.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The optimal dosing strategy of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) to treat oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated bleeding has not been established.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fixed versus variable 4F-PCC dosing for the management of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A systematic literature search and meta-analysis of clinical studies was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2022. The primary outcomes included hemostatic effectiveness, mortality, and thromboembolic events. Secondary outcomes included 4F-PCC usage, total length of stay in hospital and in intensive care units, and time to 4F-PCC administration. The pooled incidence or mean was calculated using a random-effects model and compared between the 2 dosing strategies.
Results UNASSIGNED
Twenty-five studies were included and data from 1,760 patients (fixed dosing, n = 228; variable dosing, n = 1,532) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in hemostatic effectiveness, thromboembolic events, or mortality rates between the dosing strategies. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the fixed-dosing group, with a mean stay of 7.4 days (95% CI: 3.6-11.1) compared to 5.9 days (95% CI: 5.5-6.3) in the variable-dosing group (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
A fixed-dosing strategy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to variable weight-based dosing and was associated with lower 4F-PCC usage. However, direct comparative studies are needed to confirm these results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37063756
doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100107
pii: S2475-0379(23)00076-6
pmc: PMC10099316
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100107

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Références

Blood. 2017 Oct 12;130(15):1706-1712
pubmed: 28835439
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Medicines (Basel). 2019 Oct 15;6(4):
pubmed: 31618893
Thromb Haemost. 2018 May;118(5):842-851
pubmed: 29564837
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Jan;53(1):167-175
pubmed: 34101050
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):470-485
pubmed: 31732375
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):903-908
pubmed: 30244638
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11):1234-43
pubmed: 23935011
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2641-2645
pubmed: 33041150
Thromb Res. 2021 Dec;208:112-116
pubmed: 34749042
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;37(10):1907-1911
pubmed: 30651183
Acta Haematol. 2020;143(3):266-271
pubmed: 31610537
Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Jun;41(6):501-507
pubmed: 33866591
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):755-760
pubmed: 32089040
Blood Transfus. 2010 Jul;8(3):149-54
pubmed: 20671873
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Aug;48(2):250-255
pubmed: 30941571
Circulation. 2020 May 26;141(21):1681-1689
pubmed: 32264698
Anesthesiology. 2021 Oct 1;135(4):673-685
pubmed: 34370811
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018 Apr 11;31(2):153-156
pubmed: 29706805
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):279
pubmed: 32245380
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;14(2):265-269
pubmed: 30414056
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):e282-e361
pubmed: 35579034
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3257-3291
pubmed: 30482765
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;14(1):211-4
pubmed: 26391431
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89
pubmed: 33781348
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Apr;36(2):221-226
pubmed: 34231410
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 4;76(5):594-622
pubmed: 32680646
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Jul;54(1):74-81
pubmed: 34837144
Blood Adv. 2019 Jan 22;3(2):158-167
pubmed: 30658963
J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):25-32
pubmed: 32536491
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):300-332
pubmed: 33567467
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111
pubmed: 26061376
Am J Hematol. 2019 Jun;94(6):697-709
pubmed: 30916798
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 26;22(2):163-169
pubmed: 33856296
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Jun;36(3):533-546
pubmed: 33864534
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 3;11(1):55
pubmed: 31179943
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1326-1335
pubmed: 30730782
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):294-306
pubmed: 31903428
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1300-5.e2
pubmed: 26144101
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):1203-1208
pubmed: 30983472
Br J Haematol. 2019 Mar;184(5):808-816
pubmed: 30515764
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 27;23(1):98
pubmed: 30917843
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 22;77(24):2987-3001
pubmed: 34140101
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Jan;51(1):151-158
pubmed: 32500220
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Mar;25(6):2637-2653
pubmed: 33829451
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Feb;34(1):112-120
pubmed: 32430804
Thromb Res. 2020 Oct;194:158-164
pubmed: 32788109
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Oct;52(3):828-835
pubmed: 33725284
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1637-1647
pubmed: 32291874
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;34(6):332-395
pubmed: 28459785
Int J Stroke. 2021 Apr;16(3):321-341
pubmed: 33174815
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 21;39(16):1330-1393
pubmed: 29562325
World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):1956-61
pubmed: 26341438

Auteurs

Thita Chiasakul (T)

Center of Excellence in Translational Hematology, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.

Mark Crowther (M)

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Adam Cuker (A)

Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Classifications MeSH