High-power laser lithotripsy - do we treat or harm? Histological evaluation of temperature effects in an in vivo study with thulium fiber laser.
histology
laser
lithotripsy
temperature
thulium fiber laser
Journal
Central European journal of urology
ISSN: 2080-4806
Titre abrégé: Cent European J Urol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101587101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2023
revised:
17
02
2023
accepted:
17
02
2023
medline:
18
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible histopathological alterations that occur in the kidneys due to a continuous temperature increase above 43°C for one hour of lithotripsy using a newly introduced thulium fiber laser (TFL). Two female pigs were used. After the insertion of a 9.5/11.5 ureteral access sheath, flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for one hour were conducted. A TFL laser with a 200-μm fiber was used. The power setting used was 8 W (0.5 J × 16 Hz). A K-type thermocouple was inserted and fixed in the upper calyx of the right porcine kidney to record the temperature in the pelvicalyceal system during the laser activation. Second-look flexible nephroscopy followed by nephrectomy and pathohistological evaluation of the operated kidney was performed one week after the procedure in the first pig and 2 weeks after the surgery in the second pig. Flexible nephroscopy did not reveal significant differences between the 2 porcine kidneys. Nevertheless, the histopathological report demonstrated severe alterations in the kidney of the first pig. Mild changes were reported in the kidney of the second pig. A significant improvement in inflammation and haemorrhagic lesions was demonstrated when comparing the 2 kidneys. The difference demonstrated between the 2 kidneys based on the histopathological report shows that the healing process is capable of improving severe to mild alterations within a one-week time frame. Two weeks after the surgery, only minor changes were observed, suggesting that even temperature increases above the threshold can be tolerated regarding renal damage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37064255
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.24
pii: 24
pmc: PMC10091897
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
44-48Informations de copyright
Copyright by Polish Urological Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Endourol. 2022 Dec;36(12):1599-1606
pubmed: 35793107
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Oct;73(8):682-688
pubmed: 33025913
J Endourol. 2022 Feb;36(2):251-258
pubmed: 34409842
Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2215-27
pubmed: 23553588
J Endourol. 2021 Nov;35(11):1716-1722
pubmed: 33906433
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):69
pubmed: 32539828
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):613-618
pubmed: 35771241
Int J Hyperthermia. 2004 Sep;20(6):567-93
pubmed: 15370815
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S398-S417
pubmed: 31656746
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):42-47
pubmed: 35136294
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):497-503
pubmed: 31055626
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):76-81
pubmed: 31608654
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894
pubmed: 30729311
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Jul 22;13:519-527
pubmed: 34327179
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):88-92
pubmed: 31608659
World J Urol. 2022 Jul;40(7):1853-1858
pubmed: 35366109