Predictors of trainees' proficiency during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at high- -volume institutions: results from a multicentric series.
learning curve
proficiency score
retzius-sparing
robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
trifecta
Journal
Central European journal of urology
ISSN: 2080-4806
Titre abrégé: Cent European J Urol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101587101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
20
12
2022
revised:
31
01
2023
accepted:
01
02
2023
medline:
18
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this series was to evaluate predictors of Proficiency score (PS) achievement on a multicentric series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) performed by trainee surgeons with two different surgical techniques at four tertiary-care centers. Four institutional datasets were merged and queried for RARPs performed by surgeons during their learning curve (LC) between 2010 and 2020 using two different approaches (Group A, Retzius-sparing RARP, n = 164; Group B, standard anterograde RARP, n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PS achievement for the overall trainee cohort. For all analyses, a two-sided p <0.05 was considered significant. Group B showed significantly increased median operative time, positive surgical margins (PSM) status, increased number of nerve-sparing procedures, shorter LC time (each p <0.04). PS, continence status, potency, biochemical recurrence and 1-year trifecta rates were comparable between groups (each p >0.3). On multivariable analysis, time from LC starting ≥12 months (OR = 2.79; 95%IC [1.15-6.76]; p = 0.02) and a nerve-sparing intent (OR = 3.18; 95%IC [1.15-8.77]; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of PS score achievement (Table 3). Higher PS rates for RARP trainees may be expected after 12 months from LC beginning. Short-term training courses are unlikely to confer proper surgical training, while long-term structured training programs seem to be beneficial on perioperative outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37064261
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.260
pii: 260
pmc: PMC10091888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38-43Informations de copyright
Copyright by Polish Urological Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):526-35
pubmed: 26585582
Urol Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;48(1):137-146
pubmed: 33218588
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Mar;25(1):47-54
pubmed: 34697432
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Mar;24(1):193-201
pubmed: 32814844
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):60-7
pubmed: 23759009
J Urol. 2020 Jul;204(1):91-95
pubmed: 31971494
BJU Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):617-29
pubmed: 24053179
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep 8;:
pubmed: 34493839
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):690-700
pubmed: 34147405
J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1392-8
pubmed: 22341274
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8:CD013641
pubmed: 32813279
J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):207-213
pubmed: 33761098
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Mar 31;90(1):1-7
pubmed: 29633788
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):5-7
pubmed: 29959814
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):929-949
pubmed: 34480591
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):590-596
pubmed: 31619034
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):133-136
pubmed: 35345386
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):341-9
pubmed: 22074761
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):8-16
pubmed: 31373142
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):7-8
pubmed: 30565400
J Surg Educ. 2017 May - Jun;74(3):486-494
pubmed: 27932307