Digital Technology Use and Mental Health Consultations: Survey of the Views and Experiences of Clinicians and Young People.
adolescent
anxiety
child
internet
mental health
patient-physician relationship
Journal
JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2023
17 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
04
11
2022
accepted:
20
02
2023
revised:
19
02
2023
medline:
18
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital technologies play an increasingly important role in the lives of young people and have important effects on their mental health. We aimed to explore 3 key areas of the intersection between digital technology and mental health: the views and experiences of young people and clinicians about digital technology and mental health; implementation and barriers to the UK national guidance recommendation-that the discussion of digital technology use should form a core part of mental health assessment; and how digital technology might be used to support existing consultations. Two cross-sectional web-based surveys were conducted in 2020 between June and December, with mental health clinicians (n=99) and young people (n=320). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the proportions. Multilinear regression was used to explore how the answers varied by gender, sexuality, and age. Thematic analysis was used to explore the contents of the extended free-text answers. Anxiety was measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7). Digital technology use was ubiquitous among young people, with positive and negative aspects acknowledged by both clinicians and young people. Negative experiences were common (131/284, 46.1%) and were associated with increased anxiety levels among young people (GAD-7 3.29; 95% CI 1.97-4.61; P<.001). Although the discussion of digital technology use was regarded as important by clinicians and acceptable by young people, less than half of clinicians (42/85, 49.4%) routinely asked about the use of digital technology and over a third of young people (48/121, 39.6%) who had received mental health care had never been asked about their digital technology use. The conversations were often experienced as unhelpful. Helpful conversations were characterized by greater depth and exploration of how an individual's digital technology use related to mental health. Despite most clinicians (59/83, 71.1%) wanting training, very few (21/86, 24.4%) reported receiving training. Clinicians were open to viewing mental health data from apps or social media to help with consultations. Although young people were generally, in theory, comfortable sharing such data with health professionals, when presented with a binary choice, most reported not wanting to share social media (84/117, 71.8%) or app data (67/118, 56.8%) during consultations. Digital technology use was common, and negative experiences were frequent and associated with anxiety. Over a third of young people were not asked about their digital technology use during mental health consultations, and potentially valuable information about relevant negative experiences on the web was not being captured during consultations. Clinicians would benefit from having access to training to support these discussions with young people. Although young people recognized that app data could be helpful to clinicians, they appeared hesitant to share their own data. This finding suggests that data sharing has barriers that need to be further explored.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Digital technologies play an increasingly important role in the lives of young people and have important effects on their mental health.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to explore 3 key areas of the intersection between digital technology and mental health: the views and experiences of young people and clinicians about digital technology and mental health; implementation and barriers to the UK national guidance recommendation-that the discussion of digital technology use should form a core part of mental health assessment; and how digital technology might be used to support existing consultations.
METHODS
METHODS
Two cross-sectional web-based surveys were conducted in 2020 between June and December, with mental health clinicians (n=99) and young people (n=320). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the proportions. Multilinear regression was used to explore how the answers varied by gender, sexuality, and age. Thematic analysis was used to explore the contents of the extended free-text answers. Anxiety was measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Digital technology use was ubiquitous among young people, with positive and negative aspects acknowledged by both clinicians and young people. Negative experiences were common (131/284, 46.1%) and were associated with increased anxiety levels among young people (GAD-7 3.29; 95% CI 1.97-4.61; P<.001). Although the discussion of digital technology use was regarded as important by clinicians and acceptable by young people, less than half of clinicians (42/85, 49.4%) routinely asked about the use of digital technology and over a third of young people (48/121, 39.6%) who had received mental health care had never been asked about their digital technology use. The conversations were often experienced as unhelpful. Helpful conversations were characterized by greater depth and exploration of how an individual's digital technology use related to mental health. Despite most clinicians (59/83, 71.1%) wanting training, very few (21/86, 24.4%) reported receiving training. Clinicians were open to viewing mental health data from apps or social media to help with consultations. Although young people were generally, in theory, comfortable sharing such data with health professionals, when presented with a binary choice, most reported not wanting to share social media (84/117, 71.8%) or app data (67/118, 56.8%) during consultations.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Digital technology use was common, and negative experiences were frequent and associated with anxiety. Over a third of young people were not asked about their digital technology use during mental health consultations, and potentially valuable information about relevant negative experiences on the web was not being captured during consultations. Clinicians would benefit from having access to training to support these discussions with young people. Although young people recognized that app data could be helpful to clinicians, they appeared hesitant to share their own data. This finding suggests that data sharing has barriers that need to be further explored.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37067869
pii: v10i1e44064
doi: 10.2196/44064
pmc: PMC10152330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e44064Informations de copyright
©Raphael Rifkin-Zybutz, Nicholas Turner, Jane Derges, Helen Bould, Felicity Sedgewick, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Myles-Jay Linton, Paul Moran, Lucy Biddle. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 17.04.2023.
Références
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 30;110:110293
pubmed: 33662532
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Aug 29;3(3):e14329
pubmed: 31493326
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 7;6(7):e32103
pubmed: 35797103
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 17;22(1):995
pubmed: 35581597
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Mar;31(3):463-75
pubmed: 25859714
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 01;3:763876
pubmed: 34927133
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2404-2413
pubmed: 35514202
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18286
pubmed: 33427684
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106270
pubmed: 33031868
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 10;192(6):E136-E141
pubmed: 32041697
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jul;53(7):1155-1157
pubmed: 32449523
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 12;21(7):e13218
pubmed: 31301127
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020 May;25(2):95-101
pubmed: 32307835
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 7;7:e43115
pubmed: 37027182
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Sep;31(3):717-733
pubmed: 34448303
J Sleep Res. 2020 Aug;29(4):e13074
pubmed: 32410272
Cureus. 2020 Jun 15;12(6):e8627
pubmed: 32685296
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):485
pubmed: 35854237
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 24;19(7):e262
pubmed: 28739561
Body Image. 2016 Jun;17:100-10
pubmed: 26995158
Sch Psychol Int. 2017 Aug;38(4):380-397
pubmed: 29081558
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197712
pubmed: 29795637
Internet Interv. 2016 Dec 24;15:93-99
pubmed: 30792959
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Oct 20;5(4):e37424
pubmed: 36264619
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;29(4):227-234A
pubmed: 29069107
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Jan;39:123-36
pubmed: 25192961
Psychiatry Res. 2021 May;299:113848
pubmed: 33725578
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155813
pubmed: 27191728