Importance of carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) and carcinoembrionic antigen (CEA) in the prognosis of patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective single-institution cohort study.
CA 19-9
CEA
carbohydrate antigen
carcinoembrionic antigen
duodenal adenocarcinoma
Journal
Oncotarget
ISSN: 1949-2553
Titre abrégé: Oncotarget
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532965
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 04 2023
15 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
19
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare malignancy without validated tumor markers. In practice, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) are often used in the management of DA, though their prognostic value is unknown. A single-institution retrospective review included patients diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the duodenum between 2006 and 2021. Peri-ampullary tumors were excluded. Levels of CA 19-9 and CEA were collected as continuous variables and were analyzed as binary variables: normal vs. high, using the maximum normal value as a cut-off (normal Ca 19-9 <35 U/ml; CEA <3 ng/ml). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. There were 68 patients included in the final analysis. Median age was 67 years old and median follow-up time was 22.2 months. CA 19-9 and CEA were elevated in 36.8% and 48.5% of patients, respectively. A concomitant elevation of both tumor markers was associated with worsened OS (HR 2.140, 95% CI: 1.114-4.112; In summary, CA 19-9 and, to a lesser extent, CEA, show promise as prognostic markers in DA. Larger studies are needed to validate their use and to evaluate their performance as markers of recurrence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare malignancy without validated tumor markers. In practice, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) are often used in the management of DA, though their prognostic value is unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A single-institution retrospective review included patients diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the duodenum between 2006 and 2021. Peri-ampullary tumors were excluded. Levels of CA 19-9 and CEA were collected as continuous variables and were analyzed as binary variables: normal vs. high, using the maximum normal value as a cut-off (normal Ca 19-9 <35 U/ml; CEA <3 ng/ml). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
There were 68 patients included in the final analysis. Median age was 67 years old and median follow-up time was 22.2 months. CA 19-9 and CEA were elevated in 36.8% and 48.5% of patients, respectively. A concomitant elevation of both tumor markers was associated with worsened OS (HR 2.140, 95% CI: 1.114-4.112;
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, CA 19-9 and, to a lesser extent, CEA, show promise as prognostic markers in DA. Larger studies are needed to validate their use and to evaluate their performance as markers of recurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37068159
pii: 28406
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28406
pmc: PMC10109526
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CA-19-9 Antigen
0
Carbohydrates
0
CA-125 Antigen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351-357Références
Br J Surg. 1994 Oct;81(10):1472-4
pubmed: 7820475
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Oct;56(10):2914-9
pubmed: 21735085
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Mar 15;12(3):347-357
pubmed: 32206184
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;36(3):e158-63
pubmed: 22405637
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6491049
pubmed: 28116301
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(6):967-976
pubmed: 28263387
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 01;48(8):743-747
pubmed: 29931295
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;22(5):724-8
pubmed: 17444863
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 May 1;145(5):543-553
pubmed: 32223559
Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1070-4; discussion 1074-5
pubmed: 10982512
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Aug;19(8):1908-18
pubmed: 20647399
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Mar 27;8(3):212-21
pubmed: 27022448
Br J Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;117(11):1607-1613
pubmed: 28982111
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan;16(1):113-20; discussion 120
pubmed: 22005894