Intraoperative angiography during neurosurgical procedures on patients in prone, three-quarters prone, and park-bench positions: tertiary single-center experience with systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aneurysm
Angiography
Posterior fossa
Spinal cord
Vascular Malformation
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
26
12
2022
accepted:
25
03
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is limited evidence about the role and effectiveness of intraoperative angiography (IOA) during neurosurgical procedures with patients in prone, three-quarters prone, and park-bench positions. To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IOA during neurosurgical procedures. We reviewed (between January 1960 and July 2022) all studies in which IOAs were performed during neurosurgical procedures with patients in either prone, three-quarters prone, or park-bench positions. Additionally, a cohort of patients from our institutional experience was included. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of successful angiography and the rate of surgical adjustment/revision after IOA. Safety outcomes were the rate of angiography-related complications and mortality. Data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed. A total of 26 studies with 142 patients plus 32 subjects from our institution were included in the analysis. The rate of successful intraoperative angiography was 98% (95% CI 94% to 99%; I We found that IOA performed with patients in prone, three-quarters prone, and park-bench positions is feasible and safe with a non-negligible rate of intraoperative post-angiographical surgical adjustment/revision. Our findings suggest that the performance of IOA to complement vascular neurosurgical procedures might have a valuable role in favoring patient outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence about the role and effectiveness of intraoperative angiography (IOA) during neurosurgical procedures with patients in prone, three-quarters prone, and park-bench positions.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IOA during neurosurgical procedures.
METHODS
METHODS
We reviewed (between January 1960 and July 2022) all studies in which IOAs were performed during neurosurgical procedures with patients in either prone, three-quarters prone, or park-bench positions. Additionally, a cohort of patients from our institutional experience was included. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of successful angiography and the rate of surgical adjustment/revision after IOA. Safety outcomes were the rate of angiography-related complications and mortality. Data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 26 studies with 142 patients plus 32 subjects from our institution were included in the analysis. The rate of successful intraoperative angiography was 98% (95% CI 94% to 99%; I
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We found that IOA performed with patients in prone, three-quarters prone, and park-bench positions is feasible and safe with a non-negligible rate of intraoperative post-angiographical surgical adjustment/revision. Our findings suggest that the performance of IOA to complement vascular neurosurgical procedures might have a valuable role in favoring patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37068942
pii: jnis-2022-020035
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-020035
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
793-800Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.