Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapillary Stent: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of the ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED Intergroup.
Humans
Choledochostomy
/ adverse effects
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Cholestasis
/ etiology
Stents
/ adverse effects
Endosonography
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
/ adverse effects
Drainage
/ adverse effects
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
accepted:
22
03
2023
medline:
7
7
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unclear whether preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is equivalent to electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Patients who underwent PBD for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) followed by PD were retrospectively included in nine expert centers between 2015 and 2022. ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with ECE-LAMS were performed. In intent-to-treat analysis, patients drained with ECE-LAMS were considered the study group (first-LAMS group) and those drained with conventional transpapillary stent the control group (first-cannulation group). The rates of technical success, clinical success, drainage-related complications, surgical complications, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Among 156 patients, 128 underwent ERCP and 28 ECE-LAMS in first intent. The technical and clinical success rates were 83.5% and 70.2% in the first-cannulation group versus 100% and 89.3% in the first-LAMS group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). The overall complication rate over the entire patient journey was 93.7% in first-cannulation group versus 92.0% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.04). The overall endoscopic complication rate was 30.5% in first-cannulation group versus 17.9% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.25). The overall complication rate after PD was higher in the first-cannulation group than in the first-LAMS group (92.2% versus 75.0%, p = 0.016). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the groups. PBD with ECE-LAMS is easier to deploy and more efficient than ERCP in patients with DMBO. It is associated with less surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy without compromising the oncological outcome.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is equivalent to electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS
METHODS
Patients who underwent PBD for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) followed by PD were retrospectively included in nine expert centers between 2015 and 2022. ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with ECE-LAMS were performed. In intent-to-treat analysis, patients drained with ECE-LAMS were considered the study group (first-LAMS group) and those drained with conventional transpapillary stent the control group (first-cannulation group). The rates of technical success, clinical success, drainage-related complications, surgical complications, and oncological outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 156 patients, 128 underwent ERCP and 28 ECE-LAMS in first intent. The technical and clinical success rates were 83.5% and 70.2% in the first-cannulation group versus 100% and 89.3% in the first-LAMS group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). The overall complication rate over the entire patient journey was 93.7% in first-cannulation group versus 92.0% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.04). The overall endoscopic complication rate was 30.5% in first-cannulation group versus 17.9% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.25). The overall complication rate after PD was higher in the first-cannulation group than in the first-LAMS group (92.2% versus 75.0%, p = 0.016). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PBD with ECE-LAMS is easier to deploy and more efficient than ERCP in patients with DMBO. It is associated with less surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy without compromising the oncological outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37069476
doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13466-8
pii: 10.1245/s10434-023-13466-8
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5036-5046Informations de copyright
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Références
Tol JAMG, van Hooft JE, Timmer R, et al. Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2016;65(12):1981–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762 .
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762
pubmed: 26306760
Watanabe J, Miki A, Sasanuma H, Kotani K, Sata N. Metal versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with periampullary cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1162 .
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1162
Roberts AT, Jaya J, Ha P, et al. Metal stents are safe and cost-effective for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreaticobiliary tumours. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(9):1841–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17060 .
doi: 10.1111/ans.17060
pubmed: 34309143
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1781–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
pubmed: 17509029
Ekkelenkamp V, de Man R, ter Borg F, et al. Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance: results of a nationwide quality registry. Endoscopy. 2015;47(06):503–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391231 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391231
pubmed: 25590180
Wang Q, Gurusamy KS, Lin H, Xie X, Wang C. Preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005444.pub2 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005444.pub2
pubmed: 18843716
pmcid: 8889537
Mori S, Aoki T, Park K, et al. Impact of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage on post-operative survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15329 .
doi: 10.1111/ans.15329
pubmed: 31625220
Inamdar S, Slattery E, Bhalla R, Sejpal DV, Trindade AJ. Comparison of adverse events for endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in the treatment of malignant biliary tract obstruction in an inpatient national cohort. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(1):112. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3670 .
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3670
pubmed: 26513013
Schaefer M, Albouys J, Legros R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent: the easiest way to perform EUS-CDS? Endoscopy. 2019;51(08):219–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0885-9196 .
doi: 10.1055/a-0885-9196
Jacques J, Privat J, Pinard F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2019;51(06):540–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0735-9137 .
doi: 10.1055/a-0735-9137
pubmed: 30347424
Jacques J, Privat J, Pinard F, et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy by use of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a French multicenter study after implementation of the technique (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(1):134–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.055 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.055
pubmed: 32084411
Kunda R, Pérez-Miranda M, Will U, et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction using a lumen-apposing fully covered metal stent after failed ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):5002–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4845-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4845-6
pubmed: 26969661
Tsuchiya T, Teoh AYB, Itoi T, et al. Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(4):1138–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.017
pubmed: 28843583
Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Troncone E, et al. Single-stage EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(1):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.047 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.047
pubmed: 30189198
Fabbri C. Beyond palliation: using EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent as a bridge to surgery a case series. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.281.eus .
doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.281.eus
pubmed: 30851182
Gaujoux S, Jacques J, Bourdariat R, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy following endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents an ACHBT–SFED study. HPB. 2021;23(1):154–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.001
pubmed: 32646808
Neuzillet C, Gaujoux S, Williet N, et al. Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC). Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(12):1257–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.008
pubmed: 30219670
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou I, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline—Updated October 2017. Endoscopy. 2018;50(09):910–30. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0659-9864 .
doi: 10.1055/a-0659-9864
pubmed: 30086596
Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):446–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027
pubmed: 20189503
Clavien PA, Strasberg SM. Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):197–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6dcab .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6dcab
pubmed: 19638901
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
pubmed: 16003309
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
pubmed: 28040257
Besselink MG, van Rijssen LB, Bassi C, et al. Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: a consensus statement by the international study group on pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2017;161(2):365–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058
pubmed: 27692778
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142(5):761–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
pubmed: 17981197
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)–An international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142(1):20–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001
pubmed: 17629996
Smith RA, Dajani K, Dodd S, et al. Preoperative resolution of jaundice following biliary stenting predicts more favourable early survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3138–46. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0148-z .
doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0148-z
pubmed: 18787902
Eshuis WJ, Van der Gaag N, Rauws E, et al. Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage. Ann Surg. 2010;252(5):840–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd36a2 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd36a2
pubmed: 21037440
Maruthachalam K, Lash GE, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Tumour cell dissemination following endoscopic stent insertion. Br J Surg. 2007;94(9):1151–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5790 .
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5790
pubmed: 17541987
Yamashita S, Tanemura M, Sawada G, et al. Impact of endoscopic stent insertion on detection of viable circulating tumor cells from obstructive colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7339 .
doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7339
pubmed: 29434882
pmcid: 5776945