Early experience with pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: comparison with open donor hepatectomy and non-donor laparoscopic hepatectomy.
donor hepatectomy
laparoscopic donor hepatectomy
liver transplantation
living donor liver transplant
open donor hepatectomy
Journal
ANZ journal of surgery
ISSN: 1445-2197
Titre abrégé: ANZ J Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101086634
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2023
17 Apr 2023
Historique:
revised:
18
03
2023
received:
03
12
2022
accepted:
06
04
2023
entrez:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
18
4
2023
medline:
18
4
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (L-DH) has seen a rise in uptake in recent years following the popularization of minimally invasive modality for major hepatobiliary surgery. Our study aimed to determine the safety and compare the perioperative outcomes of L-DH with open donor hepatectomy (O-DH) and laparoscopic non donor hepatectomy (L-NDH) based on our single institution experience. Eighty of 113 laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomies performed between 2015 and 2022 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 were L-DH. PSM in a 1:2 ratio of L-DH versus L-NDH and 1:1 ratio of L-DH versus O-DH were performed, identifying patients with similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. After 2:1 matching, the L-DH cohort were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and had lower ASA scores (P < 0.001) than the L-NDH cohort. L-DH was associated with a longer median operating time (P < 0.001) and shorter median postoperative stay (P < 0.001) than L-NDH. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic between the L-DH and O-DH cohorts. L-DH was associated with lower median blood loss (P = 0.040) and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in recipient outcomes for both cohorts. L-DH can be adopted safely by surgeons experienced in L-NDH and ODH. It is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (L-DH) has seen a rise in uptake in recent years following the popularization of minimally invasive modality for major hepatobiliary surgery. Our study aimed to determine the safety and compare the perioperative outcomes of L-DH with open donor hepatectomy (O-DH) and laparoscopic non donor hepatectomy (L-NDH) based on our single institution experience.
METHODS
METHODS
Eighty of 113 laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomies performed between 2015 and 2022 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 were L-DH. PSM in a 1:2 ratio of L-DH versus L-NDH and 1:1 ratio of L-DH versus O-DH were performed, identifying patients with similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After 2:1 matching, the L-DH cohort were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and had lower ASA scores (P < 0.001) than the L-NDH cohort. L-DH was associated with a longer median operating time (P < 0.001) and shorter median postoperative stay (P < 0.001) than L-NDH. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic between the L-DH and O-DH cohorts. L-DH was associated with lower median blood loss (P = 0.040) and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in recipient outcomes for both cohorts.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
L-DH can be adopted safely by surgeons experienced in L-NDH and ODH. It is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Références
Hong SK, Choi GS, Han J et al. Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: a multicenter experience. Liver Transpl. 2021; 27: 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25848.
Linn YL, Chee MY, Koh YX et al. Actual 10-year survivors and 10-year recurrence free survivors after primary liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the 21st century: a single institution contemporary experience. J. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 123: 214-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26259.
Olthoff KM, Smith AR, Abecassis M et al. Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America. Ann. Surg. 2015; 262: 465-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001383.
Goh BK, Lee SY, Teo JY et al. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32: 4658-65.
Goh BKP, Teo JY, Chan CY, Lee SY, Cheow PC, Chung AYF. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. ANZ J. Surg. 2017; 87: E143-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13628.
Goh BK, Wang Z, Koh YX, Lim KI. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: analysis of 300 cases. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 2021; 50: 742-50.
Goh BKP, Chua DW, Koh YX et al. Continuous improvements in short and long-term outcomes after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the 21st century: single institution experience with 1300 resections over 18 years. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 38: 101609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101609.
Cherqui D, Soubrane O, Husson E et al. Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation in children. Lancet 2002; 359: 392-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07598-0.
Samstein B, Cherqui D, Rotellar F et al. Totally laparoscopic full left hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation in adolescents and adults. Am. J. Transplant. 2013; 13: 2462-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12360.
Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS et al. Total laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 2015; 29: 184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3649-9.
Moon HH, Jo JH, Choi YI, Shin DH. Outcomes of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy at a small-volume center. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2022; 20: 402-7. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2022.0022.
Lapisatepun W, Junrungsee S, Chotirosniramit A et al. Comparative outcomes of pure laparoscopic and open donor right hepatectomy: the first report from a southeast Asian transplant center. BMC Surg. 2022; 22: 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01507-0.
Song JL, Yang J, Wu H et al. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy of living donor is feasible and safe: a preliminary comparative study in China. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32: 4614-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6214-0.
Yeow M, Soh S, Starkey G et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy. Surgery 2022; S0039-6060: 226-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.042.
Peng Y, Li B, Xu H, Chen K, Wei Y, Liu F. Pure laparoscopic versus open approach for living donor right hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2021; 32: 832-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0583.
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann. Surg. 2015; 261: 619-29.
Han ES, Suh KS, Lee KW et al. Advances in the surgical outcomes of 300 cases of pure laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy divided into three periods of 100 cases: a single-Centre case series. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021; 9: 553. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6886.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205-13.
Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA et al. Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association: the Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2: 333-9.
Goh BKP, Syn N, Lee SY et al. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35: 5231-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0.
Tranchart H, O'Rourke N, Van Dam R et al. Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2015; 22: 371-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.217.
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-analysis. Br. J. Surg. 2021; 109: 21-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab376.
Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX et al. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 1:1 matched analysis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 124: 560-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26556.
Chin KM, Linn YL, Cheong CK et al. Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis. ANZ J. Surg. 2021; 91: E174-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16719.
Goh BKP, Syn N, Teo JY et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent HCC: comparison with open repeat liver resection for recurrent HCC and laparoscopic resection for primary HCC. World J. Surg. 2019; 43: 878-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4828-y.
Syn NL, Kabir T, Koh YX et al. Survival advantage of laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials and propensity-score matched studies. Ann. Surg. 2020; 272: 253-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003672.
Goh BK, Teo JY, Lee SY et al. Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32: 1802-11.
Goh BKP, Lee SY, Koh YX, Kam JH, Chan CY. Minimally invasive major hepatectomies: a southeast Asian single institution contemporary experience with its first 120 consecutive cases. ANZ J. Surg. 2020; 90: 553-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15563.
Rössler F, Sapisochin G, Song G et al. Defining benchmarks for major liver surgery: a multicenter analysis of 5202 living liver donors. Ann. Surg. 2016; 264: 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849.
Goh BKP, Han HS, Chen KH et al. Defining global benchmarks for laparoscopic liver resections: an international multicenter study. Ann. Surg. 2022; 277: e839-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005530.
Chin KM, Linn YL, Cheong CK et al. Minimally invasive vs open major hepatectomies for liver malignancies: a propensity score-matched analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2022; 26: 1041-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05226-4.