Factors associated with low utilisation of cervical cancer screening among urban women in Lilongwe, Malawi: a cross sectional study.
Cervical cancer
Lilongwe City
Malawi
Screening
Visual inspection with acetic acid
Women
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 04 2023
17 04 2023
Historique:
received:
12
01
2021
accepted:
01
04
2023
medline:
19
4
2023
entrez:
18
4
2023
pubmed:
19
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In 2012, more than half a million women (528,000) were diagnosed with cervical cancer around the world. More than 80% of cervical cancer occurs in developing nations, such as Malawi, where estimates of the disease's burden show an incidence of 75.9 per 100,000 women and a mortality rate of 49.8 per 100,000 women (both age-adjusted). Despite its case fatality rate, cervical cancer can be avoided through immunization, early detection and screening. Malawi however, has low immunization and screening rates with coverage as low as 9% and 15%, respectively. Here our aim is to uncover factors that contribute to low utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Lilongwe, a large urban center. This was a qualitative cross-sectional study. Participants were chosen at random from a big metropolitan health center. In-depth interviews and two observations were undertaken by the researchers. Interviews were taped, transcribed verbatim, and content assessed. A total of 24 women and 5 health workers, with an average age of 34.8 years, were questioned. 50% of women had completed secondary school, 33.3% had completed primary school, and 4% had completed no formal education. The majority of the women were housewives and entrepreneurs. 62.5% of the respondents had fewer than four children, 25% had four to six children, and 8.3% had more than six children. 91 - 6% of those surveyed were married, with 78% of Christians and 20% of Muslims. The majority of women were unaware of the importance of cervical cancer screening. Some people were concerned about marital troubles, pain during the process, "laziness," and the amount of time necessary. The majority of people would come for a test as a result of signs and symptoms. Male health personnel would be unable to screen Muslim women. All of the medical personnel had at least two years of experience. Women's low involvement in cervical cancer screening has been linked by health workers to a lack of resources and a lack of community awareness. Cervical cancer can be prevented by early detection and treatment. Women, on the other hand, are uninformed about cervical cancer. Myths, misconceptions, cultural and religious beliefs, as well as service restrictions and community sensitization, influence the use of cervical cancer screening services. Addressing these issues has the potential to boost cervical cancer screening rates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2012, more than half a million women (528,000) were diagnosed with cervical cancer around the world. More than 80% of cervical cancer occurs in developing nations, such as Malawi, where estimates of the disease's burden show an incidence of 75.9 per 100,000 women and a mortality rate of 49.8 per 100,000 women (both age-adjusted). Despite its case fatality rate, cervical cancer can be avoided through immunization, early detection and screening. Malawi however, has low immunization and screening rates with coverage as low as 9% and 15%, respectively. Here our aim is to uncover factors that contribute to low utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Lilongwe, a large urban center.
METHODS
This was a qualitative cross-sectional study. Participants were chosen at random from a big metropolitan health center. In-depth interviews and two observations were undertaken by the researchers. Interviews were taped, transcribed verbatim, and content assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 24 women and 5 health workers, with an average age of 34.8 years, were questioned. 50% of women had completed secondary school, 33.3% had completed primary school, and 4% had completed no formal education. The majority of the women were housewives and entrepreneurs. 62.5% of the respondents had fewer than four children, 25% had four to six children, and 8.3% had more than six children. 91 - 6% of those surveyed were married, with 78% of Christians and 20% of Muslims. The majority of women were unaware of the importance of cervical cancer screening. Some people were concerned about marital troubles, pain during the process, "laziness," and the amount of time necessary. The majority of people would come for a test as a result of signs and symptoms. Male health personnel would be unable to screen Muslim women. All of the medical personnel had at least two years of experience. Women's low involvement in cervical cancer screening has been linked by health workers to a lack of resources and a lack of community awareness.
CONCLUSION
Cervical cancer can be prevented by early detection and treatment. Women, on the other hand, are uninformed about cervical cancer. Myths, misconceptions, cultural and religious beliefs, as well as service restrictions and community sensitization, influence the use of cervical cancer screening services. Addressing these issues has the potential to boost cervical cancer screening rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37069557
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02324-0
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02324-0
pmc: PMC10111711
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
183Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Reprod Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;56(11-12):491-6
pubmed: 22195332
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Mar 16;5:149
pubmed: 22424105
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Mar 14;5:125-31
pubmed: 21448296
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Sep;21(9):1434-8
pubmed: 22806169
J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):193-8
pubmed: 20054094
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;20(6):943-52
pubmed: 21671779
Indian J Med Res. 2012 Aug;136(2):205-10
pubmed: 22960886
Int J Cancer. 2004 Apr 10;109(3):461-7
pubmed: 14961588
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Oct 31;19:234
pubmed: 25838862
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002 Jul-Aug;12(4):376-82
pubmed: 12144686
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD002834
pubmed: 21563135
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Mar;22(3):276-88
pubmed: 23428284
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Mar 24;9:501-8
pubmed: 25848229
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(1):26-32
pubmed: 21668764
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Mar;19(3):463-9
pubmed: 20156089
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jan 22;8:26282
pubmed: 25623612