Potential mechanisms of osthole against bladder cancer cells based on network pharmacology, molecular docking, and experimental validation.
Bladder cancer
Molecular docking
Network Pharmacology
Osthole
Journal
BMC complementary medicine and therapies
ISSN: 2662-7671
Titre abrégé: BMC Complement Med Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761232
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2023
17 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
19
10
2022
accepted:
23
03
2023
medline:
19
4
2023
entrez:
18
4
2023
pubmed:
19
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osthole was traditionally used in treatment for various diseases. However, few studies had demonstrated that osthole could suppress bladder cancer cells and its mechanism was unclear. Therefore, we performed a research to explore the potential mechanism for osthole against bladder cancer. Internet web servers SwissTargetPrediction, PharmMapper, SuperPRED, and TargetNet were used to predict the Osthole targets. GeneCards and the OMIM database were used to indicate bladder cancer targets. The intersection of two target gene fragments was used to obtain the key target genes. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database. Furthermore, we used gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses to explore the molecular function of target genes. AutoDock software was then used to perform molecular docking of target genes,osthole and co-crystal ligand. Finally, an in vitro experiment was conducted to validate bladder cancer inhibition by osthole. Our analysis identified 369 intersection genes for osthole, the top ten target genes included MAPK1, AKT1, SRC, HRAS, HASP90AA1, PIK3R1, PTPN11, MAPK14, CREBBP, and RXRA. The GO and KEGG pathway enrichment results revealed that the PI3K-AKT pathway was closely correlated with osthole against bladder cancer. The osthole had cytotoxic effect on bladder cancer cells according to the cytotoxic assay. Additionally, osthole blocked the bladder cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promoted bladder cancer cell apoptosis by inhibiting the PI3K-AKT and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT3) pathways. We found that osthole had cytotoxic effect on bladder cancer cells and inhibited invasion, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting PI3K-AKT and JAK/STAT3 pathways in in vitro experiment. Above all, osthole might have potential significance in treatment of bladder cancer. Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Molecular Biology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Osthole was traditionally used in treatment for various diseases. However, few studies had demonstrated that osthole could suppress bladder cancer cells and its mechanism was unclear. Therefore, we performed a research to explore the potential mechanism for osthole against bladder cancer.
METHODS
METHODS
Internet web servers SwissTargetPrediction, PharmMapper, SuperPRED, and TargetNet were used to predict the Osthole targets. GeneCards and the OMIM database were used to indicate bladder cancer targets. The intersection of two target gene fragments was used to obtain the key target genes. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database. Furthermore, we used gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses to explore the molecular function of target genes. AutoDock software was then used to perform molecular docking of target genes,osthole and co-crystal ligand. Finally, an in vitro experiment was conducted to validate bladder cancer inhibition by osthole.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our analysis identified 369 intersection genes for osthole, the top ten target genes included MAPK1, AKT1, SRC, HRAS, HASP90AA1, PIK3R1, PTPN11, MAPK14, CREBBP, and RXRA. The GO and KEGG pathway enrichment results revealed that the PI3K-AKT pathway was closely correlated with osthole against bladder cancer. The osthole had cytotoxic effect on bladder cancer cells according to the cytotoxic assay. Additionally, osthole blocked the bladder cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promoted bladder cancer cell apoptosis by inhibiting the PI3K-AKT and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT3) pathways.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found that osthole had cytotoxic effect on bladder cancer cells and inhibited invasion, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting PI3K-AKT and JAK/STAT3 pathways in in vitro experiment. Above all, osthole might have potential significance in treatment of bladder cancer.
SUBJECTS
METHODS
Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Molecular Biology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37069622
doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-03938-5
pii: 10.1186/s12906-023-03938-5
pmc: PMC10108473
doi:
Substances chimiques
osthol
XH1TI1759C
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.-
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
122Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : No: 81572520
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Oncol Rep. 2017 Mar;37(3):1611-1618
pubmed: 28184928
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(21):
pubmed: 33121082
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Sep 09;2021:8885093
pubmed: 34539807
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Molecules. 2016 Jul 22;21(7):
pubmed: 27455225
Cells. 2020 Jan 15;9(1):
pubmed: 31952344
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(Web Server issue):W32-8
pubmed: 24792161
Mol Biosyst. 2015 Jul;11(7):1946-54
pubmed: 25924008
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D605-D612
pubmed: 33237311
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 11;40(1):65
pubmed: 33573671
Biol Pharm Bull. 2001 Sep;24(9):1012-5
pubmed: 11558560
Oncol Lett. 2016 Nov;12(5):3779-3784
pubmed: 27895730
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):136-150
pubmed: 34895945
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29
pubmed: 24399786
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193449
pubmed: 29590128
Eur J Pharmacol. 2020 May 5;874:172990
pubmed: 32057718
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W356-W360
pubmed: 28472422
Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6 Suppl 1):4-34
pubmed: 16399414
Chin Med. 2023 Feb 13;18(1):14
pubmed: 36782251
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2021 Aug;43(4):501-506
pubmed: 34494518
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):503-505
pubmed: 30017900
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1388-D1395
pubmed: 33151290
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2016 Jun 20;54:1.30.1-1.30.33
pubmed: 27322403
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Mini Rev Med Chem. 2021;21(18):2747-2763
pubmed: 32646359
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2020 Feb;85(2):167-176
pubmed: 32093593
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D789-98
pubmed: 25428349
Am J Chin Med. 2015;43(5):835-77
pubmed: 26243582
OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284-7
pubmed: 22455463
J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec;30(16):2785-91
pubmed: 19399780
Chem Biol Interact. 2018 Aug 25;292:65-75
pubmed: 29981725
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 24;57(8):
pubmed: 34440955
J Cell Physiol. 2021 Feb;236(2):1025-1042
pubmed: 32697363
Med Chem Res. 2021;30(10):1767-1794
pubmed: 34376964
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(Web Server issue):W26-31
pubmed: 24878925
Eur Urol. 2022 Jan;81(1):75-94
pubmed: 34511303
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Sep;70(5):404-423
pubmed: 32767764
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 22;37(1):322
pubmed: 30577812
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 16;2:e79
pubmed: 24132163
Chin J Integr Med. 2020 Jan;26(1):72-80
pubmed: 30941682
Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 28;6(25):21120-36
pubmed: 26110567
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 19;2021:3001131
pubmed: 34840695
Chem Biol Interact. 2020 Apr 1;320:109022
pubmed: 32112862
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jun 4;62(22):5061-71
pubmed: 24828835
Biomolecules. 2022 Nov 27;12(12):
pubmed: 36551192
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
pubmed: 10592173
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Apr 21;2022:5997895
pubmed: 35498147
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 May;30(5):413-24
pubmed: 27167132
JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1980-1991
pubmed: 33201207
Metab Brain Dis. 2021 Oct;36(7):1763-1777
pubmed: 34417940